Literature DB >> 33613751

The Value of Multi-targeted Fecal DNA Methylation Detection for Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Chinese Population.

Heiying Jin1, Jun Wang1, Chunxia Zhang1.   

Abstract

Objective: To design a multi-targeted fecal DNA methylation kit and explore its value for clinical application among Chinese people.
Methods: Based on previous research, a multi-targeted fecal DNA methylation detection kit, using four genes, was designed and clinically validated.
Results: The methylation PCR from 279 patients met the requirements for the detection criteria. When all four molecular markers were negative, the negative predictive value (NPV) for colorectal cancer was 100% and the NPV for colorectal polyps was 84.21%. When one molecular marker was positive, the sensitivity (Se) for colorectal cancer was 76.4%-90.3%, the specificity (Sp) was 68.3-93.4%, and the positive predictive value (PPV) for colorectal cancer was 54.5-85.5%, and the NPV was 87.0-95.0%. For colorectal polyps, the Se was 41.0-52.5%, Sp 69.5-91.5%, and the PPV for colorectal polyps was 41.0-70.3%, the NPV was 75.2-79.3%. When two molecular markers were positive, the Se for colorectal cancer was 52.6-73.7%, the Sp was 93.2-98.3%, the PPV for colorectal cancer was 84.6-96.2%, the NPV was 76.0-85.3%. For colorectal polyps, the Se was 25.9-40.7%, Sp was 93.2-98.3%, PPV for screening of colorectal polyps was 63.6-90.0%, and the NPV was 73.3-78.1%. When three molecular markers were positive, the Se for colorectal cancer was 31.6-52.6%, the Sp was 98.3-100.0%, the PPV for colorectal cancer was 94.4-100.0%, the NPV was 73.4-76.6%. For colorectal polyps, the Se was 14.8-25.9%, and Sp was 98.3-100.0%, the PPV for colorectal polyps was 85.7-100.0%, the NPV was 72.0-74.7%. When four molecular markers were positive, the Se for colorectal cancer was 31.6%, the Sp was 100.0%, and the colorectal cancer PPV was 100.0% and the NPV was 69.4%. For polyps, the Se was 14.8%, Sp was 100.0%, and PPV was 100.0% and the NPV was 72.0%.
Conclusion: The multi-targeted fecal DNA methylation detection kit for colorectal cancer and polyps had the sensitivity and specificity to meet the requirements for screening of colorectal tumors, which is easy to operate, has stable results and important clinical value. Among the four molecular markers studied, when one marker was positive for DNA methylation, colonoscopy was required; as the number of positive methylation markers increased, the specificity for the diagnosis gradually increased as well. © The author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer; colorectal polyps; fecal DNA methylation; screening

Year:  2021        PMID: 33613751      PMCID: PMC7890319          DOI: 10.7150/jca.47214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer        ISSN: 1837-9664            Impact factor:   4.478


  25 in total

1.  The Relationship between the Methylated Septin-9 DNA Blood Test and Stool Occult Blood Test for Diagnosing Colorectal Cancer in Taiwanese People.

Authors:  Chung-Hung Chen; Sheng-Lei Yan; Tsung-Hsun Yang; Shih-Feng Chen; Yung-Hsiang Yeh; Jing-Jim Ou; Chien-Hua Lin; Yueh-Tsung Lee; Chien-Hua Chen
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  What is the role of iFOBT in screening for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  A systematic review and quantitative assessment of methylation biomarkers in fecal DNA and colorectal cancer and its precursor, colorectal adenoma.

Authors:  Rongbin Liu; Xuan Su; Yakang Long; Dalei Zhou; Xiao Zhang; Zulu Ye; Jiangjun Ma; Tao Tang; Fang Wang; Caiyun He
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.657

4.  Comparison and combination of blood-based inflammatory markers with faecal occult blood tests for non-invasive colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  S Tao; U Haug; K Kuhn; H Brenner
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Five Different Fecal Markers for the Detection of Precancerous and Cancerous Lesions of the Colorectum.

Authors:  Mariann Rutka; Renáta Bor; Anita Bálint; Anna Fábián; Ágnes Milassin; Ferenc Nagy; Zoltán Szepes; Mónika Szűcs; László Tiszlavicz; Klaudia Farkas; Tamás Molnár
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.711

6.  Molecular stool testing as an alternative for surveillance colonoscopy: a cross-sectional cohort study.

Authors:  Meta C J van Lanschot; Beatriz Carvalho; Veerle M H Coupé; Manon van Engeland; Evelien Dekker; Gerrit A Meijer
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 7.  Diagnostic Accuracy of FOBT and Colorectal Cancer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Abdul Rahman Ramdzan; Muhammad Aklil Abd Rahim; Aznida Mohamad Zaki; Zuraidah Zaidun; Azmawati Mohammed Nawi
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.462

8.  Delayed Colonoscopy Following a Positive Fecal Test Result and Cancer Mortality.

Authors:  Anath A Flugelman; Nili Stein; Ori Segol; Idit Lavi; Lital Keinan-Boker
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2019-05-02

9.  Organised colorectal cancer screening in Lampang Province, Thailand: preliminary results from a pilot implementation programme.

Authors:  Thiravud Khuhaprema; Suleeporn Sangrajrang; Somkiat Lalitwongsa; Vanida Chokvanitphong; Tawarat Raunroadroong; Tawee Ratanachu-Ek; Richard Muwonge; Eric Lucas; Christopher Wild; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Novel Stool-Based Protein Biomarkers for Improved Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Linda J W Bosch; Meike de Wit; Thang V Pham; Veerle M H Coupé; Annemieke C Hiemstra; Sander R Piersma; Gideon Oudgenoeg; George L Scheffer; Sandra Mongera; Jochim Terhaar Sive Droste; Frank A Oort; Sietze T van Turenhout; Ilhame Ben Larbi; Joost Louwagie; Wim van Criekinge; Rene W M van der Hulst; Chris J J Mulder; Beatriz Carvalho; Remond J A Fijneman; Connie R Jimenez; Gerrit A Meijer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  2 in total

1.  Novel multiplex stool-based assay for the detection of early-stage colon cancer in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Hui-Hong Jiang; Si-Wei Xing; Xuan Tang; Ying Chen; Kang Lin; Lu-Wei He; Mou-Bin Lin; Er-Jiang Tang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.374

2.  New Studies of the Aberrant Alterations in Fibrillin-1 Methylation During Colorectal Cancer Development.

Authors:  Ling Lv; Jianzhong Ma; Lina Wu; Chao Zhang; Yueping Wang; Guang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.