Literature DB >> 33613372

Self and Other Mentalizing Polarities and Dimensions of Mental Health: Association With Types of Symptoms, Functioning and Well-Being.

Sergi Ballespí1, Jaume Vives2, Carla Sharp3, Lorena Chanes1,4, Neus Barrantes-Vidal1,5,6.   

Abstract

Research suggests that the ability to understand one's own and others' minds, or mentalizing, is a key factor for mental health. Most studies have focused the attention on the association between global measures of mentalizing and specific disorders. In contrast, very few studies have analyzed the association between specific mentalizing polarities and global measures of mental health. This study aimed to evaluate whether self and other polarities of mentalizing are associated with a multidimensional notion of mental health, which considers symptoms, functioning, and well-being. Additionally, the level or depth of mentalizing within each polarity was also analyzed. A sample of 214 adolescents (12-18 years old, M = 14.7, and SD = 1.7; 53.3% female) was evaluated on measures of self- (Trait Meta-Mood Scale or TMMS-24) and other- mentalizing (Adolescent Mentalizing Interview or AMI), multi-informed measures of psychopathology and functioning based on Achenbach's system, and measures of psychological well-being (self-esteem, happiness, and motivation to life goals). Results revealed no association between mentalizing polarities and higher-order symptom factors (internalizing, externalizing, and global symptoms or "p" factor). Self-mentalizing was associated with self-esteem (B = 0.076, p < 0.0005) and motivation to life goals (B = 0.209, p = 0.002), and other-mentalizing was associated to general, social and role functioning (B = 0.475, p < 0.0005; B = 0.380, p = 0.005; and B = 0.364, p = 0.004). This association between aspects of self-other mentalizing and self-other function has important implications for treatment and prevention. Deeper mentalizing within each polarity (i.e., comprehension beyond simple attention to one's own mental states, and mentalizing referred to attachment figures vs. mentalizing referred to the characters of a story) revealed stronger associations with functioning and well-being. Because mentalizing polarities are associated with functioning and well-being but not with symptoms, a new hypothesis is developed: mentalizing does not contribute to resiliency by preventing symptoms, but by helping to deal with them, thus improving functioning and well-being independently of psychopathology. These findings support that promoting mentalizing across development may improve mental health, even in non-clinical population.
Copyright © 2021 Ballespí, Vives, Sharp, Chanes and Barrantes-Vidal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescents; functioning; mental health; non-clinical population; polarities; self-other mentalizing; symptoms; well-being

Year:  2021        PMID: 33613372      PMCID: PMC7886987          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.566254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  2 in total

1.  Ability Emotional Intelligence, Attachment Models, and Reflective Functioning.

Authors:  Anna Maria Rosso
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-02

2.  The interplay of Criterion A of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders, mentalization and resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jeff Maerz; Anna Buchheim; Luna Rabl; David Riedl; Roberto Viviani; Karin Labek
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.