R M A van Erp1, A L van Doorn1, G T van den Brink1, J W B Peters2, M G H Laurant3, A J van Vught3. 1. HAN University of Applied Sciences, Verlengde Groenestraat 75, 6525 EJ, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 2. Master Advanced Nursing Practice, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Groenewoudseweg 1, 6524 TM, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 3. HAN University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Studies, Kapittelweg 33, 6525 EN, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Shifting specialist care from the hospital to primary care/community care (also called primary care plus) is proposed as one option to reduce the increasing healthcare costs, improve quality of care and accessibility. The aim of this systematic review was to get insight in primary care plus provided by physician assistants or nurse practitioners. METHODS: Scientific databases and reference list were searched. Hits were screened on title/abstract and full text. Studies published between 1990-2018 with any study design were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed using QualSyst tool. RESULTS: Search resulted in 5.848 hits, 15 studies were included. Studies investigated nurse practitioners only. Primary care plus was at least equally effective as hospital care (patient-related outcomes). The number of admission/referral rates was significantly reduced in favor of primary care plus. Barriers to implement primary care plus included obtaining equipment, structural funding, direct access to patient-data. Facilitators included multidisciplinary collaboration, medical specialist support, protocols. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION: Quality of care within primary care plus delivered by nurse practitioners appears to be guaranteed, at patient-level and professional-level, with better access to healthcare and fewer referrals to hospital. Most studies were of restricted methodological quality. Findings should be interpreted with caution. Copyright:
INTRODUCTION: Shifting specialist care from the hospital to primary care/community care (also called primary care plus) is proposed as one option to reduce the increasing healthcare costs, improve quality of care and accessibility. The aim of this systematic review was to get insight in primary care plus provided by physician assistants or nurse practitioners. METHODS: Scientific databases and reference list were searched. Hits were screened on title/abstract and full text. Studies published between 1990-2018 with any study design were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed using QualSyst tool. RESULTS: Search resulted in 5.848 hits, 15 studies were included. Studies investigated nurse practitioners only. Primary care plus was at least equally effective as hospital care (patient-related outcomes). The number of admission/referral rates was significantly reduced in favor of primary care plus. Barriers to implement primary care plus included obtaining equipment, structural funding, direct access to patient-data. Facilitators included multidisciplinary collaboration, medical specialist support, protocols. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION: Quality of care within primary care plus delivered by nurse practitioners appears to be guaranteed, at patient-level and professional-level, with better access to healthcare and fewer referrals to hospital. Most studies were of restricted methodological quality. Findings should be interpreted with caution. Copyright:
Authors: Marleen H Lovink; Anke Persoon; Raymond T C M Koopmans; Anneke J A H Van Vught; Lisette Schoonhoven; Miranda G H Laurant Journal: J Adv Nurs Date: 2017-05-02 Impact factor: 3.187
Authors: Karleen F Giannitrapani; Lucinda Leung; Alexis K Huynh; Susan E Stockdale; Danielle Rose; Jack Needleman; Elizabeth M Yano; Lisa Meredith; Lisa V Rubenstein Journal: J Interprof Care Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 2.338
Authors: Sandra H van Oostrom; H Susan J Picavet; Boukje M van Gelder; Lidwien C Lemmens; Nancy Hoeymans; Robert A Verheij; François G Schellevis; Caroline A Baan Journal: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd Date: 2011
Authors: Gillian D Sanders; Peter J Neumann; Anirban Basu; Dan W Brock; David Feeny; Murray Krahn; Karen M Kuntz; David O Meltzer; Douglas K Owens; Lisa A Prosser; Joshua A Salomon; Mark J Sculpher; Thomas A Trikalinos; Louise B Russell; Joanna E Siegel; Theodore G Ganiats Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mary Halter; Carly Wheeler; Ferruccio Pelone; Heather Gage; Simon de Lusignan; Jim Parle; Robert Grant; Jonathan Gabe; Laura Nice; Vari M Drennan Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Sofie J M van Hoof; Tessa C C Quanjel; Mariëlle E A L Kroese; Marieke D Spreeuwenberg; Dirk Ruwaard Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sadiq Y Patel; Haiden A Huskamp; Austin B Frakt; David I Auerbach; Hannah T Neprash; Michael L Barnett; Hannah O James; Ateev Mehrotra Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 9.048