Literature DB >> 33613120

Current advisory interventions for grazing ruminant farming cannot close exceedance of modern background sediment loss - Assessment using an instrumented farm platform and modelled scaling out.

A L Collins1, Y Zhang1, H R Upadhayay1, S Pulley1, S J Granger1, P Harris1, H Sint1, B Griffith1.   

Abstract

Water quality impairment by elevated sediment loss is a pervasive problem for global water resources. Sediment management targets identify exceedance or the sediment loss 'gap' requiring mitigation. In the UK, palaeo-limnological reconstruction of sediment loss during the 100-150 years pre-dating the post-World War II intensification of agriculture, has identified management targets (0.20-0.35 t ha-1 yr-1) representing 'modern background sediment delivery to rivers'. To assess exceedance on land for grazing ruminant farming, an integrated approach combined new mechanistic evidence from a heavily-instrumented experimental farm platform and a scaling out framework of modelled commercial grazing ruminant farms in similar environmental settings. Monitoring (2012-2016) on the instrumented farm platform returned sediment loss ranges of 0.11-0.14 t ha-1 yr-1 and 0.21-0.25 t ha-1 yr-1 on permanent pasture, compared with between 0.19-0.23 t ha-1 yr-1 and 0.43-0.50 t ha-1 yr-1and 0.10-0.13 t ha-1 yr-1and 0.25-0.30 t ha-1 yr-1 on pasture with scheduled plough and reseeds. Excess sediment loss existed on all three farm platform treatments but was more extensive on the two treatments with scheduled plough and reseeds. Excessive sediment loss from land used by grazing ruminant farming more strategically across England, was estimated to be up to >0.2 t ha-1 yr-1. Modelled scenarios of alternative farming futures, based on either increased uptake of interventions typically recommended by visual farm audits, or interventions selected using new mechanistic understanding for sediment loss from the instrumented farm platform, returned minimum sediment loss reductions. On the farm platform these were 2.1 % (up to 0.007 t ha-1 yr-1) and 5.1 % (up to 0.018 t ha-1 yr-1). More strategically, these were up to 2.8 % (0.014 t ha-1 yr-1) and 4.1 % (0.023 t ha-1 yr-1). Conventional on-farm measures will therefore not fully mitigate the sediment loss gap, meaning that more severe land cover change is required.
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mitigation; Ruminant farming; Sediment; Soil erosion

Year:  2021        PMID: 33613120      PMCID: PMC7883306          DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Policy        ISSN: 1462-9011            Impact factor:   5.581


  23 in total

1.  Agricultural policy: Govern our soils.

Authors:  Luca Montanarella
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Tackling agricultural diffuse pollution: What might uptake of farmer-preferred measures deliver for emissions to water and air?

Authors:  A L Collins; Y S Zhang; M Winter; A Inman; J I Jones; P J Johnes; W Cleasby; E Vrain; A Lovett; L Noble
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 3.  Clear as mud: a meta-analysis on the effects of sedimentation on freshwater fish and the effectiveness of sediment-control measures.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Chapman; Catherine L Proulx; Maxime A N Veilleux; Caroline Levert; Shireen Bliss; Marie-Ève André; Nicolas W R Lapointe; Steven J Cooke
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  The temporal and spatial variability of sediment transport and yields within the Bradford Beck catchment, West Yorkshire.

Authors:  Tracey H Goodwin; Andrew R Young; Matthew G R Holmes; Gareth H Old; Ned Hewitt; Graham J L Leeks; John C Packman; Barnaby P G Smith
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability.

Authors:  David R Montgomery
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Determining annual suspended sediment and sediment-associated trace element and nutrient fluxes.

Authors:  Arthur J Horowitz
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Suspended sediment regimes in contrasting reference-condition freshwater ecosystems: implications for water quality guidelines and management.

Authors:  Magdalena K Grove; Gary S Bilotta; Robert R Woockman; John S Schwartz
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Intensive management in grasslands causes diffuse water pollution at the farm scale.

Authors:  Sabine Peukert; Bruce A Griffith; Phillip J Murray; Christopher J A Macleod; Richard E Brazier
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.751

9.  Development of a chemical source apportionment decision support framework for catchment management.

Authors:  Sean D W Comber; Russell Smith; Peter Daldorph; Michael J Gardner; Carlos Constantino; Brian Ellor
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion.

Authors:  Pasquale Borrelli; David A Robinson; Larissa R Fleischer; Emanuele Lugato; Cristiano Ballabio; Christine Alewell; Katrin Meusburger; Sirio Modugno; Brigitta Schütt; Vito Ferro; Vincenzo Bagarello; Kristof Van Oost; Luca Montanarella; Panos Panagos
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  5 in total

1.  Does cattle and sheep grazing under best management significantly elevate sediment losses? Evidence from the North Wyke Farm Platform, UK.

Authors:  S Pulley; L M Cardenas; P Grau; S Mullan; M J Rivero; A L Collins
Journal:  J Soils Sediments       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 3.308

2.  Tackling unintended consequences of grazing livestock farming: Multi-scale assessment of co-benefits and trade-offs for water pollution mitigation scenarios.

Authors:  Yusheng Zhang; Bruce Griffith; Steve Granger; Hadewij Sint; Adrian L Collins
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 9.297

3.  Diffuse water pollution during recent extreme wet-weather in the UK: Environmental damage costs and insight into the future?

Authors:  Y Zhang; S J Granger; M A Semenov; H R Upadhayay; A L Collins
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 11.072

4.  Exploring the effects of land management change on productivity, carbon and nutrient balance: Application of an Ensemble Modelling Approach to the upper River Taw observatory, UK.

Authors:  Kirsty L Hassall; Kevin Coleman; Prakash N Dixit; Steve J Granger; Yusheng Zhang; Ryan T Sharp; Lianhai Wu; Andrew P Whitmore; Goetz M Richter; Adrian L Collins; Alice E Milne
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 10.753

5.  Soil N2O and CH4 emissions from fodder maize production with and without riparian buffer strips of differing vegetation.

Authors:  Jerry C Dlamini; L M Cardenas; E H Tesfamariam; R M Dunn; J Evans; J M B Hawkins; M S A Blackwell; A L Collins
Journal:  Plant Soil       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.993

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.