Literature DB >> 33611655

Fetal mortality associated with backfat thickness at first mating and first farrowing of the primiparous sows raised in a commercial herd in Thailand.

Atthaporn Roongsitthichai1, Em-On Olanratmanee2.   

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the fetal mortality, including stillborn piglets (SB) and mummified fetuses (MM), in relation to backfat thickness both at first mating (MBF) and at first farrowing (FBF) in 200 primiparous sows accommodated in a commercial breeding herd in Thailand. Backfat thickness of all pigs was measured at P2 position using an A-mode ultrasonography. Based on MBF, the gilts were classified into four groups: MBF1 (≤12.0 mm), MBF2 (>12.0-15.0 mm), MBF3 (>15.0-18.0 mm), and MBF4 (>18.0 mm). According to FBF, the primiparous sows were categorized into four classes: FBF1 (≤15.0 mm), FBF2 (>15.0-18.0 mm), FBF3 (>18.0-21.0 mm), and FBF4 (>21.0 mm). At farrowing, 174 litters were examined for percentage of SB and MM. The results indicated that mean MBF and FBF were 16.7 ± 0.3 mm and 19.6 ± 0.3 mm, respectively. Based on MBF, the pigs in MBF1 significantly possessed higher percentage of MM (13.8 ± 4.5%) than others; meanwhile, SB percentage was not different among groups (P > 0.05). According to FBF, the pigs in FBF4 farrowed the highest percentage of SB (9.1 ± 3.2%) than others, whereas MM percentage was not different among classes (P > 0.05). In summary, backfat thickness of the gilts should be one of the parameters to pay more attention since it is related to fetal mortality of the primiparous sows. The farmers should monitor the backfat thickness not only at the first mating time, but also along the gestation period in order to minimize fetal mortality in the primiparous sows.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Backfat thickness; Mummified fetuses; Primiparous sows; Stillborn piglets

Year:  2021        PMID: 33611655     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-021-02624-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  23 in total

1.  Stillbirth in the pig in relation to genetic merit for farrowing survival.

Authors:  J I Leenhouwers; P Wissink; T van der Lende; H Paridaans; E F Knol
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Environmental and sow-related factors affecting the duration of farrowing.

Authors:  Claudio Oliviero; Mari Heinonen; Anna Valros; Olli Peltoniemi
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.145

3.  Investigating risk factors and possible infectious aetiologies of mummified fetuses on a large piggery in Australia.

Authors:  N Dron; M Hernández-Jover; R E Doyle; P K Holyoake
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.281

4.  Inbreeding depression load for litter size in Entrepelado and Retinto Iberian pig varieties1.

Authors:  Joaquim Casellas; Noelia Ibáñez-Escriche; Luis Varona; Juan P Rosas; Jose L Noguera
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  The effect of litter size, parity and farrowing duration on placenta expulsion and retention in sows.

Authors:  S Björkman; C Oliviero; P J Rajala-Schultz; N M Soede; O A T Peltoniemi
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Oxytocin receptors and parturition in the guinea pig.

Authors:  M Alexandrova; M S Soloff
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 7.  Nutrition and sow prolificacy.

Authors:  F X Aherne; R N Kirkwood
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil Suppl       Date:  1985

8.  Results from nine generations of selection for increased litter size in swine.

Authors:  J W Holl; O W Robison
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Risk factors for stillbirth and foetal mummification in four Brazilian swine herds.

Authors:  Vladimir F Borges; Mari L Bernardi; Fernando P Bortolozzo; Ivo Wentz
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2005-04-18       Impact factor: 2.670

10.  Number of fetuses and conceptus growth throughout gestation in lines of pigs selected for ovulation rate or uterine capacity.

Authors:  B A Freking; K A Leymaster; J L Vallet; R K Christenson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.