Literature DB >> 33610166

Exploring women's thoughts on self-weighing during pregnancy: results of the Self-Weighing in Pregnancy: Experiences (SWIPE) study.

Anne E Ferrey1,2, Nerys M Astbury3,4, Yvonne Kenworthy4,5, Lucy Mackillop4,5,6, Kerstin Frie3, Susan A Jebb3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Excess gestational weight gain is common and an important risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Regular weighing can be used to assess and manage weight gain, but NICE guidelines do not recommend routine weighing during antenatal care. Trials that have tested the effectiveness of self-weighing to manage GWG have been unsuccesful in engaging women in regular self-weighing, although the reasons for lack of engagement are not fully understood. This study aimed to understand why this lack of engagement occurred by exploring the naturally occurring thoughts and feelings of pregnant women (9 to 15 weeks gestational age) who were asked to weigh themselves at home.
METHODS: Twenty-five women were recruited to take part. Participants completed short questionnaires at their first-trimester and 20-week scans. After recruitment, participants were asked to weigh themselves at roughly the same time each week for 8 weeks. Whilst they weighed themselves they were asked to audio-record their current weight and describe any thoughts or feelings that occurred as they weighed themselves. These audio recordings were then sent to researchers using a secure messaging service.
RESULTS: Most of the recruited women (56%) were unaware of guidelines for gestational weight gain, and only 40% could identify the ideal rate of GWG for their BMI group. Thematic analysis of the think-aloud recordings resulted in three main themes: "understanding weight gain in pregnancy", "taking action to prevent weight gain" and "reactions to self-weighing". Overall, there was a relatively positive response to self-weighing and some participants used self-weighing to reflect on the reasons for weight gain and plan actions they could take to avoid excess gain. Negative emotional responses tended to be related to a lack of guidance about what level of weight gain or loss was "healthy", or to other worries about the pregnancy. Of the women recruited who submitted at least one think aloud recording (n 10), 80% found self-weighing to be useful, and said they would likely continue to self-weigh at home.
CONCLUSIONS: Women had complex emotions about self-weighing during pregnancy but overall found it useful, suggesting it could be encouraged as part of self-regulatory interventions to control GWG. Clear guidelines about appropriate gestational weight gain could help to reduce anxiety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was prospectively registered with ISRCTN ISRCTN10035244 .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gestational weight gain; Self-monitoring; Self-regulation; Self-weighing

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33610166      PMCID: PMC7897370          DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03636-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth        ISSN: 1471-2393            Impact factor:   3.007


  21 in total

1.  Making sense of qualitative data analysis: an introduction with illustrations from DIPEx (personal experiences of health and illness).

Authors:  Sue Ziebland; Ann McPherson
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Weighing the evidence: benefits of regular weight monitoring for weight control.

Authors:  Kerri Boutelle
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.045

3.  Self-weighing and simple dietary advice for overweight and obese pregnant women to reduce obstetric complications without impact on quality of life: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  E A McCarthy; S P Walker; A Ugoni; M Lappas; O Leong; A Shub
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Reducing excessive weight gain in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Kirby Jeffries; Alexis Shub; Susan P Walker; Richard Hiscock; Michael Permezel
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 5.  Outcomes of maternal weight gain.

Authors:  Meera Viswanathan; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Merry K Moos; Andrea Deierlein; Sunni Mumford; Julie Knaack; Patricia Thieda; Linda J Lux; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)       Date:  2008-05

6.  Combined associations of prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with the outcome of pregnancy.

Authors:  Ellen A Nohr; Michael Vaeth; Jennifer L Baker; Thorkild Ia Sørensen; Jorn Olsen; Kathleen M Rasmussen
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Effectiveness of a self-regulation intervention for weight loss: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kerstin Frie; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Susan A Jebb; Paul Aveyard
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2020-06-02

8.  Routine weighing of women during pregnancy-is it time to change current practice?

Authors:  V Allen-Walker; J Woodside; V Holmes; I Young; M E Cupples; A Hunter; M C McKinley
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  The impact of regular self-weighing on weight management: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Vanwormer; Simone A French; Mark A Pereira; Ericka M Welsh
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  No global consensus: a cross-sectional survey of maternal weight policies.

Authors:  Courtney Scott; Christopher T Andersen; Natali Valdez; Francisco Mardones; Ellen A Nohr; Lucilla Poston; Katharina C Quack Loetscher; Barbara Abrams
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.