Luo Huang1, Xin Zhang1, Yu Bai1, Kevin L M Chua2, Yue Xie1, Xiaolei Shu1, Bin Long1, Chunbo Fan1, Darren W T Lim3, Sze Huey Tan4, Joseph T S Wee2, Ying Wang5, Yongzhong Wu6, Melvin L K Chua7. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China. 2. Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore. 3. Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; IMCB NCC MPI Singapore Oncogenome Laboratory, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore. 4. Division of Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China. Electronic address: 13996412826@163.com. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China. Electronic address: cqmdwyz@163.com. 7. Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: melvin.chua.l.k@singhealth.com.sg.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is no standard-of-care for recurrent, metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rmNPC) after first-line chemotherapy. Here, we report the efficacy and safety data of apatinib in rmNPC patients. METHODS: Thirty-five biopsy-proven rmNPC patients received apatinib at 500 mg/day under a compassionate access programme. Primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). Kaplan-meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Toxicity was assessed by CTCAE v4.0. RESULTS: 82.9% (29 of 35) of patients had poly-metastatic rmNPC. All patients, except five, were platinum-refractory; 37.1% (13 of 35) received ≥ 2 lines. Median number of apatinib cycles was 4.0 (IQR: 2.0-8.0). ORR was 31.4% (11 of 35 [95% CI: 16.9-49.3]) and disease control rate was 74.3% (26 of 35 [95% CI: 56.7-87.5]); 11 (31.4%) and 4 (11.4%) patients demonstrated response for ≥ 6 and ≥ 12 months, respectively. Median PFS and OS was 3.9 (95% CI: 3.1-5.5) months and 5.8 (95% CI: 4.5-8.0) months, respectively. Among the ≥ 12-month responders, all patients had pre-apatinib EBV DNA titer of <700 (range: 353-622) copies/ml; this was consistent with the association of PFS with pre-apatinib EBV DNA titer (adjusted HR 3.364 [95% CI: 1.428-7.923] for ≥ 4000 copies/ml, P = 0.006). 42.9% (15 of 35) of patients required dose reduction. Nonetheless, only five (14.3%) patients suffered from G3 toxicities (two haematological, one hypertension, one hand-foot syndrome and one elevated aminotransferases). CONCLUSION: Our data suggests potential efficacy of apatinib in rmNPC patients. Although incidence of severe toxicities was low, dose modification was required in 42.9% of patients.
BACKGROUND: There is no standard-of-care for recurrent, metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rmNPC) after first-line chemotherapy. Here, we report the efficacy and safety data of apatinib in rmNPC patients. METHODS: Thirty-five biopsy-proven rmNPC patients received apatinib at 500 mg/day under a compassionate access programme. Primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). Kaplan-meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Toxicity was assessed by CTCAE v4.0. RESULTS: 82.9% (29 of 35) of patients had poly-metastatic rmNPC. All patients, except five, were platinum-refractory; 37.1% (13 of 35) received ≥ 2 lines. Median number of apatinib cycles was 4.0 (IQR: 2.0-8.0). ORR was 31.4% (11 of 35 [95% CI: 16.9-49.3]) and disease control rate was 74.3% (26 of 35 [95% CI: 56.7-87.5]); 11 (31.4%) and 4 (11.4%) patients demonstrated response for ≥ 6 and ≥ 12 months, respectively. Median PFS and OS was 3.9 (95% CI: 3.1-5.5) months and 5.8 (95% CI: 4.5-8.0) months, respectively. Among the ≥ 12-month responders, all patients had pre-apatinib EBV DNA titer of <700 (range: 353-622) copies/ml; this was consistent with the association of PFS with pre-apatinib EBV DNA titer (adjusted HR 3.364 [95% CI: 1.428-7.923] for ≥ 4000 copies/ml, P = 0.006). 42.9% (15 of 35) of patients required dose reduction. Nonetheless, only five (14.3%) patients suffered from G3 toxicities (two haematological, one hypertension, one hand-foot syndrome and one elevated aminotransferases). CONCLUSION: Our data suggests potential efficacy of apatinib in rmNPC patients. Although incidence of severe toxicities was low, dose modification was required in 42.9% of patients.