| Literature DB >> 33609993 |
Joydip Mondal1, Wu Li2, Amgad R Rezk3, Leslie Y Yeo3, Rajaram Lakkaraju4, Parthasarathi Ghosh5, Muthupandian Ashokkumar6.
Abstract
The generation of cavitation-free radicals through evanescent electric field and bulk-streaming was reported when micro-volumes of a liquid were subjected to 10 MHz surface acoustic waves (SAW) on a piezoelectric substrate [Rezk et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 4655-4661; Rezk et al., Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2001983]. In the current study, we have tested a similar hypothesis with PZT-based ultrasonic units (760 kHz and 2 MHz) with varying dissolved gas concentrations, by sonochemiluminescence measurement and iodide dosimetry, to correlate radical generation with dissolved gas concentrations. The dissolved gas concentration was adjusted by controlling the over-head gas pressure. Our study reveals that there is a strong correlation between sonochemical activity and dissolved gas concentration, with negligible sonochemical activity at near-vacuum conditions. We therefore conclude that radical generation is dominated by acoustic cavitation in conventional PZT-based ultrasonic reactors, regardless of the excitation frequency.Entities:
Keywords: Acoustic cavitation; Cavitation bubbles; Cavitation-free radical generation; Sonochemical activity
Year: 2021 PMID: 33609993 PMCID: PMC7902534 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105493
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ultrason Sonochem ISSN: 1350-4177 Impact factor: 7.491
Fig. 1Schematic showing the experimental setup using A) a fabricated flask with stopper; B) degassing setup providing different overhead gas pressures; C) measurement of sonochemical activity by 2 methods. The arrows indicate where the 4 types of solution with different gas concentrations (a1: 101325 Pa, a2: 2000 Pa, a3: 33 Pa, a4: 3 Pa) were acquired.
Fig. 2A) SCL signal and 2B) radical yield at near vacuum conditions (3 Pa) with volume of PZT cell ~50 mL at a frequency of 760 kHz. SCL signals are normalized; Error bars are shown on the top of each bar with a circle marker.
Fig. 3SCL intensity observed at different dissolved gas pressures (in Pa) in sonicating luminol solution.
Fig. 4Radical yield measurements (μM/min) for different dissolved gas pressures on sonicating water at different frequencies.