Literature DB >> 33609194

Stability Analysis of a Signaling Circuit with Dual Species of GTPase Switches.

Lucas M Stolerman1, Pradipta Ghosh2,3,4, Padmini Rangamani5.   

Abstract

GTPases are molecular switches that regulate a wide range of cellular processes, such as organelle biogenesis, position, shape, function, vesicular transport between organelles, and signal transduction. These hydrolase enzymes operate by toggling between an active ("ON") guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-bound state and an inactive ("OFF") guanosine diphosphate (GDP)-bound state; such a toggle is regulated by GEFs (guanine nucleotide exchange factors) and GAPs (GTPase activating proteins). Here we propose a model for a network motif between monomeric (m) and trimeric (t) GTPases assembled exclusively in eukaryotic cells of multicellular organisms. We develop a system of ordinary differential equations in which these two classes of GTPases are interlinked conditional to their ON/OFF states within a motif through coupling and feedback loops. We provide explicit formulae for the steady states of the system and perform classical local stability analysis to systematically investigate the role of the different connections between the GTPase switches. Interestingly, a coupling of the active mGTPase to the GEF of the tGTPase was sufficient to provide two locally stable states: one where both active/inactive forms of the mGTPase can be interpreted as having low concentrations and the other where both m- and tGTPase have high concentrations. Moreover, when a feedback loop from the GEF of the tGTPase to the GAP of the mGTPase was added to the coupled system, two other locally stable states emerged. In both states the tGTPase is inactivated and active tGTPase concentrations are low. Finally, the addition of a second feedback loop, from the active tGTPase to the GAP of the mGTPase, gives rise to a family of steady states that can be parametrized by a range of inactive tGTPase concentrations. Our findings reveal that the coupling of these two different GTPase motifs can dramatically change their steady-state behaviors and shed light on how such coupling may impact signaling mechanisms in eukaryotic cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biochemical switches; GTPases; Network motifs; Stability analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33609194      PMCID: PMC8378325          DOI: 10.1007/s11538-021-00864-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   1.758


  66 in total

Review 1.  G protein pathways.

Authors:  Susana R Neves; Prahlad T Ram; Ravi Iyengar
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-31       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  GEFs and GAPs: critical elements in the control of small G proteins.

Authors:  Johannes L Bos; Holger Rehmann; Alfred Wittinghofer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Positive-feedback loops as a flexible biological module.

Authors:  Nicholas T Ingolia; Andrew W Murray
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Deterministic limit of stochastic chemical kinetics.

Authors:  Daniel T Gillespie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 5.  GEF means go: turning on RHO GTPases with guanine nucleotide-exchange factors.

Authors:  Kent L Rossman; Channing J Der; John Sondek
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 6.  Logic-based models for the analysis of cell signaling networks.

Authors:  Melody K Morris; Julio Saez-Rodriguez; Peter K Sorger; Douglas A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Probing the mutational landscape of regulators of G protein signaling proteins in cancer.

Authors:  Vincent DiGiacomo; Marcin Maziarz; Alex Luebbers; Jillian M Norris; Pandu Laksono; Mikel Garcia-Marcos
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 8.  The emerging mutational landscape of G proteins and G-protein-coupled receptors in cancer.

Authors:  Morgan O'Hayre; José Vázquez-Prado; Irina Kufareva; Eric W Stawiski; Tracy M Handel; Somasekar Seshagiri; J Silvio Gutkind
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 9.  The GAPs, GEFs, and GDIs of heterotrimeric G-protein alpha subunits.

Authors:  David P Siderovski; Francis S Willard
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 6.580

10.  A Comparison of Deterministic and Stochastic Modeling Approaches for Biochemical Reaction Systems: On Fixed Points, Means, and Modes.

Authors:  Sayuri K Hahl; Andreas Kremling
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.