Literature DB >> 33609168

The prognostic value of high-grade prostate cancer pattern on MRI-targeted biopsies: predictors for downgrading and importance of concomitant systematic biopsies.

Cécile Manceau1, Gaëlle Fromont-Hankard2, Jean-Baptiste Beauval3, Marine Lesourd4, Christophe Almeras3, Anne-Sophie Bajeot4, Jean-Romain Gautier3, Michel Soulié4, Guillaume Loison3, Ambroise Salin3, Christophe Tollon3, Bernard Malavaud4, Mathieu Roumiguié4, Guillaume Ploussard3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the proportion and risk factors for downgrading and reclassification to favorable disease in patients having high-grade (HG) prostate cancer (PCa) pattern on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted-biopsy (TB).
METHODS: From a radical prostatectomy (RP) cohort, we included patients with pre-biopsy positive MRI and HG [defined by Grade Group (GG) ≥ 3] PCa on MRI-TB. All patients also underwent concomitant systematic biopsy (SB). The main endpoints were the rates of downgrading to GG2, overall downgrading, favorable disease (pT2 and GG2) on RP specimens, and biochemical recurrence-free-survival (RFS). We studied the correlations between HG on concomitant SB, final pathological outcomes and biochemical RFS curves.
RESULTS: Overall downgrading, downgrading to GG2 disease and favorable disease were noted in 36.2%, 24.1%, and 15.4% respectively. HG on concomitant SB was correlated with pT3-4 disease (p < 0.001), pN1 disease (p < 0.001), positive surgical margins (p = 0.043), PSA recurrence (p = 0.003). In multivariable analysis, the presence of GG4-5 on TB (p = 0.013; OR 0.263) and the presence of HG on concomitant SB (p = 0.010; OR 0.269) were negatively and independently correlated with the risk of downgrading to GG2. The presence of HG on concomitant SB independently predicted RFS with a hazard ratio of 2.173 (p = 0.049; 95% CI 1.005-4.697).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data shows that a limited HG restricted to TB can often be associated with a favorable grade in almost a quarter of the cases and downgraded in almost half of the cases. Detailed SB features, mainly the presence of HG on concomitant SB, was associated with a more accurate pathology and oncologic outcomes prediction, pleading for the maintenance of SB in MRI-positive patients.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Downgrading; MRI; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Systematic biopsy; Targeted biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33609168     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03631-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  22 in total

1.  Biopsy characteristics in men with a preoperative diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma with high Gleason score (8-10) predict pathologic outcome in radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Fadi Brimo; Bin Xu; Eleonora Scarlata; Louis R Bégin; Alan Spatz; Laurent Salomon; Ahmed S Zakaria; Guillaume Ploussard; Frank Bladou; Wassim Kassouf; Simon Tanguay; Simone Chevalier; Huihui Ye; Armen Aprikian
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.

Authors:  Marloes van der Leest; Erik Cornel; Bas Israël; Rianne Hendriks; Anwar R Padhani; Martijn Hoogenboom; Patrik Zamecnik; Dirk Bakker; Anglita Yanti Setiasti; Jeroen Veltman; Huib van den Hout; Hans van der Lelij; Inge van Oort; Sjoerd Klaver; Frans Debruyne; Michiel Sedelaar; Gerjon Hannink; Maroeska Rovers; Christina Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study.

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Philippe Puech; Raphaële Renard-Penna; Michel Claudon; Catherine Roy; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Myriam Decaussin-Petrucci; Marine Dubreuil-Chambardel; Laurent Magaud; Laurent Remontet; Alain Ruffion; Marc Colombel; Sébastien Crouzet; Anne-Marie Schott; Laurent Lemaitre; Muriel Rabilloud; Nicolas Grenier
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Downgrading of Grade Group After Radical Prostatectomy: Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Fusion Biopsy and Standard 12-Core Biopsy.

Authors:  Alp Tuna Beksac; Stanislaw Sobotka; Paige Xu; Akriti Gupta; Patrick Julien Treacy; Rachel Weil; Kanika Mahajan; Sonya Prasad; Shivaram Cumarasamy; Alberto Martini; Ugo Falagario; Ardeshir Rastinehad; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-based metastasis-directed radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C Artigas; P Flamen; F Charlier; H Levillain; Z Wimana; R Diamand; S Albisinni; T Gil; R Van Velthoven; A Peltier; D Van Gestel; T Roumeguere; F-X Otte
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Added Value of Concomitant Systematic and Fusion Targeted Biopsies for Grade Group Prediction Based on Radical Prostatectomy Final Pathology on Positive Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Jean-Baptiste Beauval; Marine Lesourd; Christophe Almeras; Jacques Assoun; Richard Aziza; Jean-Romain Gautier; Guillaume Loison; Daniel Portalez; Ambroise Salin; Christophe Tollon; Michel Soulié; Bernard Malavaud; Mathieu Roumiguié
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Efficiency of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis by MR/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy vs Standard Extended-Sextant Biopsy for MR-Visible Lesions.

Authors:  M Minhaj Siddiqui; Arvin K George; Rachel Rubin; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Howard L Parnes; Maria J Merino; Richard M Simon; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Concordance Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Pathology in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shokhi Goel; Jonathan E Shoag; Michael D Gross; Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh; Brian Robinson; Francesca Khani; Becky Baltich Nelson; Daniel J Margolis; Jim C Hu
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-09-04

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy.

Authors:  M Minhaj Siddiqui; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Hong Truong; Lambros Stamatakis; Srinivas Vourganti; Jeffrey Nix; Anthony N Hoang; Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Brian Shuch; Michael Weintraub; Jochen Kruecker; Hayet Amalou; Baris Turkbey; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Antti S Rannikko; Marcelo Borghi; Valeria Panebianco; Lance A Mynderse; Markku H Vaarala; Alberto Briganti; Lars Budäus; Giles Hellawell; Richard G Hindley; Monique J Roobol; Scott Eggener; Maneesh Ghei; Arnauld Villers; Franck Bladou; Geert M Villeirs; Jaspal Virdi; Silvan Boxler; Grégoire Robert; Paras B Singh; Wulphert Venderink; Boris A Hadaschik; Alain Ruffion; Jim C Hu; Daniel Margolis; Sébastien Crouzet; Laurence Klotz; Samir S Taneja; Peter Pinto; Inderbir Gill; Clare Allen; Francesco Giganti; Alex Freeman; Stephen Morris; Shonit Punwani; Norman R Williams; Chris Brew-Graves; Jonathan Deeks; Yemisi Takwoingi; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 176.079

View more
  2 in total

1.  Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mike Wenzel; Felix Preisser; Clarissa Wittler; Benedikt Hoeh; Peter J Wild; Alexandra Tschäbunin; Boris Bodelle; Christoph Würnschimmel; Derya Tilki; Markus Graefen; Andreas Becker; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Felix K H Chun; Luis A Kluth; Jens Köllermann; Philipp Mandel
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-15

2.  Combined Systematic and MRI-US Fusion Prostate Biopsy Has the Highest Grading Accuracy When Compared to Final Pathology.

Authors:  Iulia Andras; Emanuel Darius Cata; Andreea Serban; Pierre Kadula; Teodora Telecan; Maximilian Buzoianu; Maria Bungardean; Dan Vasile Stanca; Ioan Coman; Nicolae Crisan
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.