Literature DB >> 33608661

Development and validation of a reinforcement learning algorithm to dynamically optimize mechanical ventilation in critical care.

Arne Peine1, Ahmed Hallawa1,2, Johannes Bickenbach1, Guido Dartmann3, Lejla Begic Fazlic3, Anke Schmeink4, Gerd Ascheid2, Christoph Thiemermann5, Andreas Schuppert6, Ryan Kindle7,8, Leo Celi7,8,9, Gernot Marx1, Lukas Martin10.   

Abstract

The aim of this work was to develop and evaluate the reinforcement learning algorithm VentAI, which is able to suggest a dynamically optimized mechanical ventilation regime for critically-ill patients. We built, validated and tested its performance on 11,943 events of volume-controlled mechanical ventilation derived from 61,532 distinct ICU admissions and tested it on an independent, secondary dataset (200,859 ICU stays; 25,086 mechanical ventilation events). A patient "data fingerprint" of 44 features was extracted as multidimensional time series in 4-hour time steps. We used a Markov decision process, including a reward system and a Q-learning approach, to find the optimized settings for positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) and ideal body weight-adjusted tidal volume (Vt). The observed outcome was in-hospital or 90-day mortality. VentAI reached a significantly increased estimated performance return of 83.3 (primary dataset) and 84.1 (secondary dataset) compared to physicians' standard clinical care (51.1). The number of recommended action changes per mechanically ventilated patient constantly exceeded those of the clinicians. VentAI chose 202.9% more frequently ventilation regimes with lower Vt (5-7.5 mL/kg), but 50.8% less for regimes with higher Vt (7.5-10 mL/kg). VentAI recommended 29.3% more frequently PEEP levels of 5-7 cm H2O and 53.6% more frequently PEEP levels of 7-9 cmH2O. VentAI avoided high (>55%) FiO2 values (59.8% decrease), while preferring the range of 50-55% (140.3% increase). In conclusion, VentAI provides reproducible high performance by dynamically choosing an optimized, individualized ventilation strategy and thus might be of benefit for critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33608661      PMCID: PMC7895944          DOI: 10.1038/s41746-021-00388-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NPJ Digit Med        ISSN: 2398-6352


  28 in total

Review 1.  Ventilator-induced lung injury.

Authors:  Arthur S Slutsky; V Marco Ranieri
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Protective versus Conventional Ventilation for Surgery: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ary Serpa Neto; Sabrine N T Hemmes; Carmen S V Barbas; Martin Beiderlinden; Michelle Biehl; Jan M Binnekade; Jaume Canet; Ana Fernandez-Bustamante; Emmanuel Futier; Ognjen Gajic; Göran Hedenstierna; Markus W Hollmann; Samir Jaber; Alf Kozian; Marc Licker; Wen-Qian Lin; Andrew D Maslow; Stavros G Memtsoudis; Dinis Reis Miranda; Pierre Moine; Thomas Ng; Domenico Paparella; Christian Putensen; Marco Ranieri; Federica Scavonetto; Thomas Schilling; Werner Schmid; Gabriele Selmo; Paolo Severgnini; Juraj Sprung; Sugantha Sundar; Daniel Talmor; Tanja Treschan; Carmen Unzueta; Toby N Weingarten; Esther K Wolthuis; Hermann Wrigge; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Paolo Pelosi; Marcus J Schultz
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 3.  Electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  Beatriz Lobo; Cecilia Hermosa; Ana Abella; Federico Gordo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-01

4.  Feasibility and safety of extracorporeal CO2 removal to enhance protective ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: the SUPERNOVA study.

Authors:  Alain Combes; Vito Fanelli; Tai Pham; V Marco Ranieri
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Higher vs lower positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthias Briel; Maureen Meade; Alain Mercat; Roy G Brower; Daniel Talmor; Stephen D Walter; Arthur S Slutsky; Eleanor Pullenayegum; Qi Zhou; Deborah Cook; Laurent Brochard; Jean-Christophe M Richard; Francois Lamontagne; Neera Bhatnagar; Thomas E Stewart; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Mechanical Ventilation and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygena tion in Acute Respiratory Insufficiency.

Authors:  Falk Fichtner; Onnen Moerer; Sven Laudi; Steffen Weber-Carstens; Monika Nothacker; Udo Kaisers
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Effect of a Low vs Intermediate Tidal Volume Strategy on Ventilator-Free Days in Intensive Care Unit Patients Without ARDS: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Fabienne D Simonis; Ary Serpa Neto; Jan M Binnekade; Annemarije Braber; Karina C M Bruin; Rogier M Determann; Geert-Jan Goekoop; Jeroen Heidt; Janneke Horn; Gerard Innemee; Evert de Jonge; Nicole P Juffermans; Peter E Spronk; Lotte M Steuten; Pieter Roel Tuinman; Rob B P de Wilde; Marijn Vriends; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Paolo Pelosi; Marcus J Schultz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Positive end-expiratory pressure setting in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alain Mercat; Jean-Christophe M Richard; Bruno Vielle; Samir Jaber; David Osman; Jean-Luc Diehl; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Gwenaël Prat; Jack Richecoeur; Ania Nieszkowska; Claude Gervais; Jérôme Baudot; Lila Bouadma; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  High levels of PEEP may improve survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuji Oba; Danish M Thameem; Tareq Zaza
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 3.415

10.  Guidelines for reinforcement learning in healthcare.

Authors:  Omer Gottesman; Fredrik Johansson; Matthieu Komorowski; Aldo Faisal; David Sontag; Finale Doshi-Velez; Leo Anthony Celi
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  6 in total

1.  Deconfounding Actor-Critic Network with Policy Adaptation for Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Changchang Yin; Ruoqi Liu; Jeffrey Caterino; Ping Zhang
Journal:  KDD       Date:  2022-08-13

2.  Learning from chess engines: how reinforcement learning could redefine clinical decision-making in rheumatology.

Authors:  Thomas Hügle
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 27.973

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence in perioperative medicine: a narrative review.

Authors:  Hyun-Kyu Yoon; Hyun-Lim Yang; Chul-Woo Jung; Hyung-Chul Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-03-29

4.  Machine learning-based suggestion for critical interventions in the management of potentially severe conditioned patients in emergency department triage.

Authors:  Hansol Chang; Jae Yong Yu; Sunyoung Yoon; Taerim Kim; Won Chul Cha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Predicting Abnormalities in Laboratory Values of Patients in the Intensive Care Unit Using Different Deep Learning Models: Comparative Study.

Authors:  Ahmad Ayad; Ahmed Hallawa; Arne Peine; Lukas Martin; Lejla Begic Fazlic; Guido Dartmann; Gernot Marx; Anke Schmeink
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-08-24

Review 6.  Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Medicine.

Authors:  Joo Heung Yoon; Michael R Pinsky; Gilles Clermont
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 19.334

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.