Literature DB >> 33608409

Ontogeny of Hepatic Transporters and Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes in Humans and in Nonclinical Species.

B D van Groen1, J Nicolaï1, A C Kuik1, S Van Cruchten1, E van Peer1, A Smits1, S Schmidt1, S N de Wildt1, K Allegaert1, L De Schaepdrijver1, P Annaert2, J Badée1.   

Abstract

The liver represents a major eliminating and detoxifying organ, determining exposure to endogenous compounds, drugs, and other xenobiotics. Drug transporters (DTs) and drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) are key determinants of disposition, efficacy, and toxicity of drugs. Changes in their mRNA and protein expression levels and associated functional activity between the perinatal period until adulthood impact drug disposition. However, high-resolution ontogeny profiles for hepatic DTs and DMEs in nonclinical species and humans are lacking. Meanwhile, increasing use of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models necessitates availability of underlying ontogeny profiles to reliably predict drug exposure in children. In addition, understanding of species similarities and differences in DT/DME ontogeny is crucial for selecting the most appropriate animal species when studying the impact of development on pharmacokinetics. Cross-species ontogeny mapping is also required for adequate translation of drug disposition data in developing nonclinical species to humans. This review presents a quantitative cross-species compilation of the ontogeny of DTs and DMEs relevant to hepatic drug disposition. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed Central: Tables and graphs (often after digitization) in original manuscripts were used to extract ontogeny data. Data from independent studies were standardized and normalized before being compiled in graphs and tables for further interpretation. New insights gained from these high-resolution ontogeny profiles will be indispensable to understand cross-species differences in maturation of hepatic DTs and DMEs. Integration of these ontogeny data into PBPK models will support improved predictions of pediatric hepatic drug disposition processes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Hepatic drug transporters (DTs) and drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) play pivotal roles in hepatic drug disposition. Developmental changes in expression levels and activities of these proteins drive age-dependent pharmacokinetics. This review compiles the currently available ontogeny profiles of DTs and DMEs expressed in livers of humans and nonclinical species, enabling robust interpretation of age-related changes in drug disposition and ultimately optimization of pediatric drug therapy.
Copyright © 2021 by The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33608409     DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.120.000071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Rev        ISSN: 0031-6997            Impact factor:   25.468


  10 in total

1.  A proof of concept using the Ussing chamber methodology to study pediatric intestinal drug transport and age-dependent differences in absorption.

Authors:  Eva J Streekstra; Márton Kiss; Jeroen van den Heuvel; Johan Nicolaï; Petra van den Broek; Sanne M B I Botden; Martijn W J Stommel; Lara van Rijssel; Anna-Lena Ungell; Evita van de Steeg; Frans G M Russel; Saskia N de Wildt
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 2.  Ways to Improve Insights into Clindamycin Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics Tailored to Practice.

Authors:  Laura Armengol Álvarez; Greet Van de Sijpe; Stefanie Desmet; Willem-Jan Metsemakers; Isabel Spriet; Karel Allegaert; Jef Rozenski
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-21

Review 3.  The Impact of Pharmacogenetics on Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Neonates and Infants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nadir Yalçin; Robert B Flint; Ron H N van Schaik; Sinno H P Simons; Karel Allegaert
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-30

4.  Influence of CYP2D6 genetic variation on adverse events with propafenone in the pediatric and young adult population.

Authors:  Sudeep D Sunthankar; Prince J Kannankeril; Andrea Gaedigk; Andrew E Radbill; Frank A Fish; Sara L Van Driest
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Influence of CYP2D6 metabolizer status on ondansetron efficacy in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A case series.

Authors:  Andrea Edwards; Ashley Teusink-Cross; Lisa J Martin; Cynthia A Prows; Parinda A Mehta; Laura B Ramsey
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 4.689

6.  External Evaluation of Risperidone Population Pharmacokinetic Models Using Opportunistic Pediatric Data.

Authors:  Eleni Karatza; Samit Ganguly; Chi D Hornik; William J Muller; Amira Al-Uzri; Laura James; Stephen J Balevic; Daniel Gonzalez
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous cefotaxime indicates that higher doses are required for critically ill children.

Authors:  Stan J F Hartman; Parth J Upadhyay; Ron A A Mathôt; Michiel van der Flier; Michiel F Schreuder; Roger J Brüggemann; Catherijne A Knibbe; Saskia N de Wildt
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 5.758

Review 8.  Sildenafil during the 2nd and 3rd Trimester of Pregnancy: Trials and Tribulations.

Authors:  Felix Rafael De Bie; David Basurto; Sailesh Kumar; Jan Deprest; Francesca Maria Russo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Model-Informed Optimization of a Pediatric Clinical Pharmacokinetic Trial of a New Spironolactone Liquid Formulation.

Authors:  Manasa Tatipalli; Vijay Kumar Siripuram; Tao Long; Diana Shuster; Galina Bernstein; Pierre Martineau; Kim A Cook; Rodrigo Cristofoletti; Stephan Schmidt; Valvanera Vozmediano
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 10.  Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models Are Effective Support for Pediatric Drug Development.

Authors:  Kefei Wang; Kun Jiang; Xiaoyi Wei; Yulan Li; Tiejie Wang; Yang Song
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.246

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.