Literature DB >> 33608043

Performance of model-based multifactor dimensionality reduction methods for epistasis detection by controlling population structure.

Fentaw Abegaz1, François Van Lishout2, Jestinah M Mahachie John2, Kridsadakorn Chiachoompu2, Archana Bhardwaj2, Diane Duroux2, Elena S Gusareva2, Zhi Wei3, Hakon Hakonarson4,5, Kristel Van Steen2,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In genome-wide association studies the extent and impact of confounding due to population structure have been well recognized. Inadequate handling of such confounding is likely to lead to spurious associations, hampering replication, and the identification of causal variants. Several strategies have been developed for protecting associations against confounding, the most popular one is based on Principal Component Analysis. In contrast, the extent and impact of confounding due to population structure in gene-gene interaction association epistasis studies are much less investigated and understood. In particular, the role of nonlinear genetic population substructure in epistasis detection is largely under-investigated, especially outside a regression framework.
METHODS: To identify causal variants in synergy, to improve interpretability and replicability of epistasis results, we introduce three strategies based on a model-based multifactor dimensionality reduction approach for structured populations, namely MBMDR-PC, MBMDR-PG, and MBMDR-GC.
RESULTS: Simulation results comparing the performance of various approaches show that in the presence of population structure MBMDR-PC and MBMDR-PG consistently better control type I error rate at the nominal level than MBMDR-GC. Moreover, our proposed three methods of population structure correction outperform MDR-SP in terms of statistical power.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrate through extensive simulation studies the effect of various degrees of genetic population structure and relatedness on epistasis detection and propose appropriate remedial measures based on linear and nonlinear sample genetic similarity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Confounding; Epistasis; GWAIS; GWAS; Gene-gene interaction; MB-MDR; Population stratification; Population structure; Principal components

Year:  2021        PMID: 33608043     DOI: 10.1186/s13040-021-00247-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BioData Min        ISSN: 1756-0381            Impact factor:   2.522


  45 in total

1.  BLOCK-BASED BAYESIAN EPISTASIS ASSOCIATION MAPPING WITH APPLICATION TO WTCCC TYPE 1 DIABETES DATA.

Authors:  By Yu Zhang; Jing Zhang; Jun S Liu
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  The effects of human population structure on large genetic association studies.

Authors:  Jonathan Marchini; Lon R Cardon; Michael S Phillips; Peter Donnelly
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-03-28       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  BOOST: A fast approach to detecting gene-gene interactions in genome-wide case-control studies.

Authors:  Xiang Wan; Can Yang; Qiang Yang; Hong Xue; Xiaodan Fan; Nelson L S Tang; Weichuan Yu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  The TDT and other family-based tests for linkage disequilibrium and association.

Authors:  R S Spielman; W J Ewens
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  The family based association test method: strategies for studying general genotype--phenotype associations.

Authors:  S Horvath; X Xu; N M Laird
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen-metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer.

Authors:  M D Ritchie; L W Hahn; N Roodi; L R Bailey; W D Dupont; F F Parl; J H Moore
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-06-11       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 7.  New approaches to population stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Noah A Zaitlen; David Reich; Nick Patterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Model-based multifactor dimensionality reduction for detecting epistasis in case-control data in the presence of noise.

Authors:  Tom Cattaert; M Luz Calle; Scott M Dudek; Jestinah M Mahachie John; François Van Lishout; Victor Urrea; Marylyn D Ritchie; Kristel Van Steen
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 1.670

9.  High-throughput analysis of epistasis in genome-wide association studies with BiForce.

Authors:  Attila Gyenesei; Jonathan Moody; Colin A M Semple; Chris S Haley; Wen-Hua Wei
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Performance analysis of novel methods for detecting epistasis.

Authors:  Junliang Shang; Junying Zhang; Yan Sun; Dan Liu; Daojun Ye; Yaling Yin
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  Roles of interacting stress-related genes in lifespan regulation: insights for translating experimental findings to humans.

Authors:  Anatoliy I Yashin; Deqing Wu; Konstantin Arbeev; Arseniy P Yashkin; Igor Akushevich; Olivia Bagley; Matt Duan; Svetlana Ukraintseva
Journal:  J Transl Genet Genom       Date:  2021-10-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.