Literature DB >> 33608026

Classifying maternal deaths in Suriname using WHO ICD-MM: different interpretation by Physicians, National and International Maternal Death Review Committees.

Lachmi R Kodan1,2, Kim J C Verschueren3, Affette M McCaw-Binns4, Ray Tjon Kon Fat5, Joyce L Browne6, Marcus J Rijken3,6, Kitty W M Bloemenkamp3.   

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) provides a framework (ICD-MM) to classify pregnancy-related deaths systematically, which enables global comparison among countries. We compared the classification of pregnancy-related deaths in Suriname by the attending physician and by the national maternal death review (MDR) committee and among the MDR committees of Suriname, Jamaica and the Netherlands. There were 89 possible pregnancy-related deaths in Suriname between 2010 and 2014. Nearly half (47%) were classified differently by the Surinamese MDR committee as compared to the classification of the attending physicians. All three MDR committees agreed that 18% (n = 16/89) of the cases were no maternal deaths. Out of the remaining 73 cases, there was disagreement regarding whether 15% (n = 11) were maternal deaths. The Surinamese and Jamaican MDR committees achieved greater consensus in classification than the Surinamese and the Netherlands MDR committees. The Netherlands MDR committee classified more deaths as unspecified than Surinamese and the Jamaican MDR committees. Underlying causes that achieved a high level of agreement among the three committees were abortive outcomes and obstetric hemorrhage, while little agreement was reported for unspecified and other direct causes. The issues encountered during maternal death classification using the ICD-MM guidelines included classification of suicide during early pregnancy; when to assume pregnancy without objective evidence; how to count maternal deaths occurring outside the country of residence; the relevance of direct or indirect cause attribution; and how to select the underlying cause when direct and indirect conditions or multiple comorbidities co-occur. Addressing these classification barriers in future revisions of the ICD-MM guidelines could enhance the feasibility of maternal death classification and facilitate global comparison.
BACKGROUND: Insight into the underlying causes of pregnancy-related deaths is essential to develop policies to avert preventable deaths. The WHO International Classification of Diseases-Maternal Mortality (ICD-MM) guidelines provide a framework to standardize maternal death classifications and enable comparison in and among countries over time. However, despite the implementation of these guidelines, differences in classification remain. We evaluated consensus on maternal death classification using the ICD-MM guidelines.
METHODS: The classification of pregnancy-related deaths in Suriname during 2010-2014 was compared in the country (between the attending physician and the national maternal death review (MDR) committee), and among the MDR committees from Suriname, Jamaica and the Netherlands. All reviewers applied the ICD-MM guidelines. The inter-rater reliability (Fleiss kappa [κ]) was used to measure agreement.
RESULTS: Out of the 89 cases certified by attending physicians, 47% (n = 42) were classified differently by the Surinamese MDR committee. The three MDR committees agreed that 18% (n = 16/89) of these cases were no maternal deaths, and, therefore, excluded from further analyses. However, opinions differed whether 15% (n = 11) of the remaining 73 cases were maternal deaths. The MDR committees achieved moderate agreement classifying the deaths into type (direct, indirect and unspecified) (κ = 0.53) and underlying cause group (κ = 0.52). The Netherlands MDR committee classified more maternal deaths as unspecified (19%), than the Jamaican (7%) and Surinamese (4%) committees did. The mutual agreement between the Surinamese and Jamaican MDR committees (κ = 0.69 vs κ = 0.63) was better than between the Surinamese and the Netherlands MDR committees (κ = 0.48 vs κ = 0.49) for classification into type and underlying cause group, respectively. Agreement on the underlying cause category was excellent for abortive outcomes (κ = 0.85) and obstetric hemorrhage (κ = 0.74) and fair for unspecified (κ = 0.29) and other direct causes (κ = 0.32).
CONCLUSIONS: Maternal death classification differs in Suriname and among MDR committees from different countries, despite using the ICD-MM guidelines on similar cases. Specific challenges in applying these guidelines included attribution of underlying cause when comorbidities occurred, the inclusion of deaths from suicides, and maternal deaths that occurred outside the country of residence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chain of events; Classification; Inter-rater reliability; Maternal death review committees; Pregnancy-related deaths; Underlying cause; WHO ICD-MM

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33608026      PMCID: PMC7893967          DOI: 10.1186/s12978-020-01051-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health        ISSN: 1742-4755            Impact factor:   3.223


  24 in total

1.  Classification differences and maternal mortality: a European study. MOMS Group. MOthers' Mortality and Severe morbidity.

Authors:  B Salanave; M H Bouvier-Colle; N Varnoux; S Alexander; A Macfarlane
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: key concepts, approaches, and applications.

Authors:  Natasa Gisev; J Simon Bell; Timothy F Chen
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2012-06-12

3.  What you count is what you target: the implications of maternal death classification for tracking progress towards reducing maternal mortality in developing countries.

Authors:  Suzanne Cross; Jacqueline S Bell; Wendy J Graham
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Vital registration and under-reporting of maternal mortality in Jamaica.

Authors:  Affette M McCaw-Binns; Jasneth A Mullings; Yvette Holder
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  Using the new ICD-MM classification system for attribution of cause of maternal death--a pilot study.

Authors:  C A Ameh; A Adegoke; R C Pattinson; N van den Broek
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Maternal mortality: direct or indirect has become irrelevant.

Authors:  Thomas van den Akker; Manisha Nair; Martijn Goedhart; Joke Schutte; Timme Schaap; Marian Knight
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 26.763

7.  Classification of maternal deaths: where does the chain of events start?

Authors:  Thomas van den Akker; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp; Jos van Roosmalen; Marian Knight
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Rise in maternal mortality in the Netherlands.

Authors:  J M Schutte; E A P Steegers; N W E Schuitemaker; J G Santema; K de Boer; M Pel; G Vermeulen; W Visser; J van Roosmalen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Validity of a Minimally Invasive Autopsy for Cause of Death Determination in Adults in Mozambique: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Paola Castillo; Miguel J Martínez; Esperança Ussene; Dercio Jordao; Lucilia Lovane; Mamudo R Ismail; Carla Carrilho; Cesaltina Lorenzoni; Fabiola Fernandes; Rosa Bene; Antonio Palhares; Luiz Ferreira; Marcus Lacerda; Inacio Mandomando; Jordi Vila; Juan Carlos Hurtado; Khátia Munguambe; Maria Maixenchs; Ariadna Sanz; Llorenç Quintó; Eusebio Macete; Pedro Alonso; Quique Bassat; Clara Menéndez; Jaume Ordi
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Underreporting of deaths in the maternal deaths surveillance system in one region of Morocco.

Authors:  Saloua Abouchadi; Wei-Hong Zhang; Vincent De Brouwere
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Target areas to reduce the burden of maternal death due to obstetric hemorrhage in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Neamin Tesfay; Rozina Tariku; Alemu Zenebe; Haymanot Firde; Fitsum Woldeyohannes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.