Literature DB >> 33607944

Natural history observations in moderate aortic stenosis.

Yu Du1,2, Mario Gössl1, Santiago Garcia1, Maurice Enriquez-Sarano1, Joao L Cavalcante1, Richard Bae1, Go Hashimoto1, Miho Fukui1, Bernardo Lopes1, Aisha Ahmed1, Christian Schmidt1, Larissa Stanberry1, Ross Garberich1, Steven M Bradley1, Robert Steffen1, Paul Sorajja3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The natural history of patients with moderate aortic stenosis (AS) is poorly understood. We aimed to determine the long-term outcomes of patients with moderate AS.
METHODS: We examined patients with moderate AS defined by echocardiography in our healthcare system, and performed survival analyses for occurrence of death, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, and progression of AS, with accounting for symptoms, left ventricular dysfunction, and comorbidities.
RESULTS: We examined 729 patients with moderate AS (median age, 76 years; 59.9 % men) with a median follow-up of 5.0 years (interquartile range: 2.0 to 8.1 years). The 5-year overall survival was 52.3 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 48.6 % to 56.0 %) and survival free of death or HF hospitalization was 43.2 % (95 % CI: 39.5 % to 46.9 %). Worse New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class was associated with poor long-term survival, with mortality rates ranging from 7.9 % (95 % CI: 6.6-9.2 %) to 25.2 % (95 % CI: 20.2-30.3 %) per year. Among patients with minimal or no symptoms, no futility markers, and preserved left ventricular function, 5-year overall survival was 71.9 % (95 % CI: 66.4-77.4 %) and survival free of death or HF hospitalization was 61.4 % (95 % CI: 55.5-67.3 %). Risk factors associated with adverse events were age, NYHA class, low ejection fraction and high aortic valve velocity (all p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with moderate AS are at significant risk of death. Our findings highlight the need for more study into appropriate therapeutic interventions to improve the prognosis of these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Aortic valve replacement; Moderate; Outcomes; Survival

Year:  2021        PMID: 33607944     DOI: 10.1186/s12872-021-01901-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord        ISSN: 1471-2261            Impact factor:   2.298


  2 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating Medical Therapy for Calcific Aortic Stenosis: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Devraj Sukul; Marc R Dweck; Mahesh V Madhavan; Benoit J Arsenault; Megan Coylewright; W David Merryman; David E Newby; John Lewis; Frank E Harrell; Michael J Mack; Martin B Leon; Catherine M Otto; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Discordant severity criteria in patients with moderate aortic stenosis: prognostic implications.

Authors:  Stephan M Pio; Mohammed R Amanullah; Steele C Butcher; Kenny Y Sin; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Philippe Pibarot; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Zee Pin Ding; Philippe Généreux; Martin B Leon; See Hooi Ewe; Victoria Delgado; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.