Jonas Czwikla1, Alexandra Herzberg2, Sonja Kapp2, Stephan Kloep3, Annika Schmidt4, Heinz Rothgang2, Falk Schwendicke5, Falk Hoffmann6. 1. Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany; Department of Health, Long-term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany; High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstraße 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany. Electronic address: czwikla@uni-bremen.de. 2. Department of Health, Long-term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany; High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstraße 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany. 3. High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstraße 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany; Competence Center for Clinical Trials, University of Bremen, Linzer Straße 4, 28359 Bremen, Germany. 4. High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstraße 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany; Department for Health Care Research, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Grazer Straße 4, 28359 Bremen, Germany. 5. Department of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health, Health Services Research, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Aßmannshauser Straße 4-6, 14197 Berlin, Germany. 6. Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare the objective and subjective oral health of older nursing home residents and home care recipients, and to investigate whether oral health is associated with sociodemographic characteristics and the long-term care (LTC) setting. METHODS: In two German studies, the oral health of 246 nursing home residents and 90 home care recipients aged ≥60 years was assessed objectively using the Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) and subjectively using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). OHAT and OHIP scores were compared between both settings. Multivariable logistic regressions were applied to investigate whether oral health is associated with sex, age group, LTC grade, and LTC setting. RESULTS: OHAT and OHIP mean scores in the home care setting were higher compared to the nursing home setting (OHAT: 3.13 vs. 1.28, p < .0001; OHIP: 7.81 vs. 2.15, p < .0001). The adjusted odds ratios for poor objective and subjective oral health for home care recipients vs. nursing home residents were 6.71 (95 % confidence interval 3.29-13.69) and 4.92 (2.77-8.76). No significant associations with sociodemographic characteristics were found. CONCLUSIONS: Oral health was poor in both settings, but home care recipients were more likely to have poor oral health than nursing home residents. Interventions to improve oral health are needed in the nursing home setting and, even more importantly, in the home care setting. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Oral health among older people in need of LTC is poor and should be improved. From a health policy perspective, home care recipients may need more attention.
OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare the objective and subjective oral health of older nursing home residents and home care recipients, and to investigate whether oral health is associated with sociodemographic characteristics and the long-term care (LTC) setting. METHODS: In two German studies, the oral health of 246 nursing home residents and 90 home care recipients aged ≥60 years was assessed objectively using the Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) and subjectively using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). OHAT and OHIP scores were compared between both settings. Multivariable logistic regressions were applied to investigate whether oral health is associated with sex, age group, LTC grade, and LTC setting. RESULTS: OHAT and OHIP mean scores in the home care setting were higher compared to the nursing home setting (OHAT: 3.13 vs. 1.28, p < .0001; OHIP: 7.81 vs. 2.15, p < .0001). The adjusted odds ratios for poor objective and subjective oral health for home care recipients vs. nursing home residents were 6.71 (95 % confidence interval 3.29-13.69) and 4.92 (2.77-8.76). No significant associations with sociodemographic characteristics were found. CONCLUSIONS: Oral health was poor in both settings, but home care recipients were more likely to have poor oral health than nursing home residents. Interventions to improve oral health are needed in the nursing home setting and, even more importantly, in the home care setting. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Oral health among older people in need of LTC is poor and should be improved. From a health policy perspective, home care recipients may need more attention.
Authors: Jessica Persson; Isabelle Johansson; Cristina Joy Torgé; Eva-Karin Bergström; Catharina Hägglin; Inger Wårdh Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-31 Impact factor: 4.614