Literature DB >> 33607120

Use of nonpreferred contraceptive methods among women in Ohio.

Payal Chakraborty1, Maria F Gallo2, Saira Nawaz3, Mikaela H Smith2, Robert B Hood2, Shibani Chettri2, Danielle Bessett4, Alison H Norris2, John Casterline5, Abigail Norris Turner6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We describe the prevalence and correlates of nonuse of preferred contraceptive method among women 18-44 years of age in Ohio using contraception. STUDY
DESIGN: The population-representative Ohio Survey of Women had 2529 participants in 2018-2019, with a response rate of 33.5%. We examined prevalence of preferred method nonuse, reasons for nonuse, and satisfaction with current method among current contraception users (n = 1390). We evaluated associations between demographic and healthcare factors and preferred method nonuse.
RESULTS: About 25% of women reported not using their preferred contraceptive method. The most common barrier to obtaining preferred method was affordability (13%). Those not using their preferred method identified long-acting methods (49%), oral contraception (33%), or condoms (21%) as their preferred methods. The proportion using their preferred method was highest among intrauterine device (IUD) users (86%) and lowest among emergency contraception users (64%). About 16% of women using permanent contraception reported it was not their preferred method. Having the lowest socioeconomic status (versus highest) (prevalence ratio [PR]: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.11-1.96), Hispanic ethnicity (versus non-Hispanic white) (PR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.15-2.90), reporting poor provider satisfaction related to contraceptive care (PR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.02-5.29), and not having a yearly women's checkup (PR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01-1.68) were significantly associated with nonuse of preferred method. Compared to preferred-method nonusers, higher proportions of preferred-method users reported consistent contraceptive use (89% vs. 73%, p < 0.001) and intent to continue use (79% vs. 58%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Affordability and poor provider satisfaction related to contraceptive care were associated with nonuse of preferred contraceptive method. Those using their preferred method reported more consistent use. IMPLICATIONS: Cost is an important barrier for women in obtaining their preferred contraceptive methods. Low quality birth control care may also be a barrier to preferred-method use. Removal of cost barriers and improvement in contraceptive counseling strategies may increase access to preferred contraceptive methods.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Ohio; Patient centered; Patient preference; Reproductive health; United States

Year:  2021        PMID: 33607120     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  5 in total

1.  Coerced Choice: Resigned Contraceptive Usership Among Individuals Affected by Reproductive Coercion.

Authors:  Kathryn E Fay; Summer Corry; Rebecca G Simmons; Jami Baayd
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 2.891

2.  mHealth Interventions for Contraceptive Behavior Change in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alice F Cartwright; Amy Alspaugh; Laura E Britton; Seth M Noar
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2022-03-08

3.  Associations between unfulfilled contraceptive preferences due to cost and low-income patients' access to and experiences of contraceptive care in the United States, 2015-2019.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Emma Pliskin; Rubina Hussain
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  A prospective analysis of the relationship between sexual acceptability and contraceptive satisfaction over time.

Authors:  Renee D Kramer; Jenny A Higgins; Bethany Everett; David K Turok; Jessica N Sanders
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  A Prospective Cohort Study of Changes in Access to Contraceptive Care and Use Two Years after Iowa Medicaid Coverage Restrictions at Abortion-Providing Facilities Went into Effect.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Mia Zolna; Emma Pliskin; Katrina MacFarlane
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2022-09-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.