Literature DB >> 33606737

Determining the willingness of Australians to export their corneas on death.

Heather M Machin1,2, Lisa Buckland3, Christine Critchley4,5, Steven Wiffen3, Gerard Sutton6,7, Paul N Baird2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: 12.7 million people await a corneal transplant, but 53% are without access to corneal tissue. Sharing corneal tissue across nations can provide some access, however the willingness of export populations, like Australians, to export their donation on death, has never been evaluated. Our research samples the Australian population, determining their willingness to export. MATERIALS AND
METHOD: We conducted e-surveys. N = 1044 Australians participated. The sample represented the Australian population, based on population demographics. Chi-Square and bivariate correlation coefficients examined associations between categorical variables, with a sample size of N = 1044, power of 0.80, and alpha of p = 0.05. Outcome measures were based on population sampling, by exploring willingness export, through the e-survey method.
RESULTS: 38% (n = 397) of respondents said yes to exportation, 23.8% (n = 248) said no, and 38.2% (n = 399) were undecided. We found no relationship between willingness to export and general demographics, though those registered on the Donatelife Register (p = < .001), and those already willing to donate their eyes (p = < .001) were significantly more willing to export. DISCUSSION: More Australians are willing to export their corneas than not, though a significant portion remain undecided. The Donatelife Register, and donation awareness, are key components of respondent decision making. Therefore, the provision of information about exportation prior to, and at the point-of-donation, is essential for assisting Australian's to decide to export or not. Further examination and development of consent-for-export systems are necessary before routine exportation is undertaken.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33606737      PMCID: PMC7894941          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  4 in total

Review 1.  Should Nations With Surplus Donated Corneal Tissue Export to Those Without? A Review of Sector Opinion Through the Example of One Nation-Australia.

Authors:  Heather Machin; Gerard Sutton; Paul N Baird
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 2.  Ethical Issues in Transnational Eye Banking.

Authors:  Dominique E Martin; Richard Kelly; Gary L A Jones; Heather Machin; Graeme A Pollock
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Examining the Impact of Corneal Tissue Transnational Activity, and Transplantation, on Import and Export Nations: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Heather Machin; Janan Arslan; Paul N Baird
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Global Survey of Corneal Transplantation and Eye Banking.

Authors:  Philippe Gain; Rémy Jullienne; Zhiguo He; Mansour Aldossary; Sophie Acquart; Fabrice Cognasse; Gilles Thuret
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.389

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Do Corneal Tissue Providers Inform Their Community That They Export Corneas? An Audit of Publicly Available Sector Websites.

Authors:  Heather Machin; Brian Philippy; Graeme A Pollock
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.