Kiddus Yitbarek1, Gelila Abraham1, Melkamu Berhane2, Sarah Hurlburt3, Carlyn Mann3, Ayinengida Adamu4, Gebeyehu Tsega4, Mirkuzie Woldie1,3. 1. Department of Health Policy and Management, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. 2. Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. 3. Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America. 4. Department of Public Health, Bahirdar University, Bahirdar, Ethiopia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although much has been documented about the performance of the health extension program, there is a lack of information on how efficiently the program is running. Furthermore, the rising cost of health services and the absence of competition among publicly owned health facilities demands strong follow up of efficiency. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the technical efficiency of the health posts and determinants in Southwestern Ethiopia. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We used data for one Ethiopian fiscal year (from July 2016 to June 2017) to estimate the technical efficiency of health posts. A total of 66 health posts were included in the analysis. We employed a two-stage data envelopment analysis to estimate technical efficiency. At the first stage, technical efficiency scores were calculated using data envelopment analysis program version 2.1. Predictors of technical efficiency were then identified at the second stage using Tobit regression, with STATA version 14. RESULTS: The findings revealed that 21.2% were technically efficient with a mean technical efficiency score of 0.6 (± 0.3), indicating that health posts could increase their service volume by 36% with no change made to the inputs they received. On the other hand, health posts had an average scale efficiency score of 0.8 (± 0.2) implying that the facilities have the potential to increase service volume by 16% with the existing resources. The regression model has indicated average waiting time for service has negatively affected technical efficiency. CONCLUSION: More than three-quarters of health posts were found inefficient. The technical efficiency score of more than one-third of the health posts is even less than 50%. Community mobilization to enhance the uptake of health services at the health posts coupled with a possible reallocation of resources in less efficient health posts is a possible approach to improve the efficiency of the program.
BACKGROUND: Although much has been documented about the performance of the health extension program, there is a lack of information on how efficiently the program is running. Furthermore, the rising cost of health services and the absence of competition among publicly owned health facilities demands strong follow up of efficiency. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the technical efficiency of the health posts and determinants in Southwestern Ethiopia. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We used data for one Ethiopian fiscal year (from July 2016 to June 2017) to estimate the technical efficiency of health posts. A total of 66 health posts were included in the analysis. We employed a two-stage data envelopment analysis to estimate technical efficiency. At the first stage, technical efficiency scores were calculated using data envelopment analysis program version 2.1. Predictors of technical efficiency were then identified at the second stage using Tobit regression, with STATA version 14. RESULTS: The findings revealed that 21.2% were technically efficient with a mean technical efficiency score of 0.6 (± 0.3), indicating that health posts could increase their service volume by 36% with no change made to the inputs they received. On the other hand, health posts had an average scale efficiency score of 0.8 (± 0.2) implying that the facilities have the potential to increase service volume by 16% with the existing resources. The regression model has indicated average waiting time for service has negatively affected technical efficiency. CONCLUSION: More than three-quarters of health posts were found inefficient. The technical efficiency score of more than one-third of the health posts is even less than 50%. Community mobilization to enhance the uptake of health services at the health posts coupled with a possible reallocation of resources in less efficient health posts is a possible approach to improve the efficiency of the program.
Authors: Bejoy Nambiar; Dougal S Hargreaves; Chelsea Morroni; Michelle Heys; Sonya Crowe; Christina Pagel; Felicity Fitzgerald; Susana Frazao Pinheiro; Delan Devakumar; Sue Mann; Monica Lakhanpaul; Martin Marshall; Tim Colbourn Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Firew Ayalew Desta; Girma Temam Shifa; Damtew WoldeMariam Dagoye; Catherine Carr; Jos Van Roosmalen; Jelle Stekelenburg; Assefa Bulcha Nedi; Adrienne Kols; Young Mi Kim Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-12-20 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Jenny Ruducha; Carlyn Mann; Neha S Singh; Tsegaye D Gemebo; Negussie S Tessema; Angela Baschieri; Ingrid Friberg; Taddese A Zerfu; Mohammed Yassin; Giovanny A Franca; Peter Berman Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Mihajlo Jakovljevic; Yuriy Timofeyev; Chhabi Lal Ranabhat; Paula Odete Fernandes; João Paulo Teixeira; Nemanja Rancic; Vladimir Reshetnikov Journal: Global Health Date: 2020-07-16 Impact factor: 4.185