Literature DB >> 33606354

Current trends in flow cytometry automated data analysis software.

Melissa Cheung1, Jonathan J Campbell2, Liam Whitby3, Robert J Thomas1, Julian Braybrook2, Jon Petzing1.   

Abstract

Automated flow cytometry (FC) data analysis tools for cell population identification and characterization are increasingly being used in academic, biotechnology, pharmaceutical, and clinical laboratories. The development of these computational methods is designed to overcome reproducibility and process bottleneck issues in manual gating, however, the take-up of these tools remains (anecdotally) low. Here, we performed a comprehensive literature survey of state-of-the-art computational tools typically published by research, clinical, and biomanufacturing laboratories for automated FC data analysis and identified popular tools based on literature citation counts. Dimensionality reduction methods ranked highly, such as generic t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) and its initial Matlab-based implementation for cytometry data viSNE. Software with graphical user interfaces also ranked highly, including PhenoGraph, SPADE1, FlowSOM, and Citrus, with unsupervised learning methods outnumbering supervised learning methods, and algorithm type popularity spread across K-Means, hierarchical, density-based, model-based, and other classes of clustering algorithms. Additionally, to illustrate the actual use typically within clinical spaces alongside frequent citations, a survey issued by UK NEQAS Leucocyte Immunophenotyping to identify software usage trends among clinical laboratories was completed. The survey revealed 53% of laboratories have not yet taken up automated cell population identification methods, though among those that have, Infinicyt software is the most frequently identified. Survey respondents considered data output quality to be the most important factor when using automated FC data analysis software, followed by software speed and level of technical support. This review found differences in software usage between biomedical institutions, with tools for discovery, data exploration, and visualization more popular in academia, whereas automated tools for specialized targeted analysis that apply supervised learning methods were more used in clinical settings.
© 2021 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automation; cell therapy; data analysis; flow cytometry; gating; software

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33606354     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.24320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  6 in total

1.  Cellular Immunity Is Critical for Assessing COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness in Immunocompromised Individuals.

Authors:  Eustache Paramithiotis; Scott Sugden; Eszter Papp; Marie Bonhomme; Todd Chermak; Stephanie Y Crawford; Stefanie Z Demetriades; Gerson Galdos; Bruce L Lambert; John Mattison; Thomas McDade; Stephane Pillet; Robert Murphy
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 2.  Challenges in translational machine learning.

Authors:  Artuur Couckuyt; Ruth Seurinck; Annelies Emmaneel; Katrien Quintelier; David Novak; Sofie Van Gassen; Yvan Saeys
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.881

3.  UMAP Based Anomaly Detection for Minimal Residual Disease Quantification within Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Lisa Weijler; Florian Kowarsch; Matthias Wödlinger; Michael Reiter; Margarita Maurer-Granofszky; Angela Schumich; Michael N Dworzak
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Discover immunotherapy biomarkers from single-cell cytometry data.

Authors:  Beibei Ru; Peng Jiang
Journal:  Patterns (N Y)       Date:  2021-12-10

5.  Assessment of Automated Flow Cytometry Data Analysis Tools within Cell and Gene Therapy Manufacturing.

Authors:  Melissa Cheung; Jonathan J Campbell; Robert J Thomas; Julian Braybrook; Jon Petzing
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  A cross-standardized flow cytometry platform to assess phenotypic stability in precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) xenografts.

Authors:  Nina Rolf; Lorraine Y T Liu; Angela Tsang; Philipp F Lange; Chinten James Lim; Christopher A Maxwell; Suzanne M Vercauteren; Gregor S D Reid
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.714

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.