Literature DB >> 33606129

Oncological outcomes and stoma-free survival following TaTME, a prospective cohort study.

S Hallam1, F Ahmed2, N Gouvas2, S Pandey2, D Nicol2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transanal TME (TaTME) was introduced to improve access to the pelvis in difficult cases (male sex, obesity and mid to low rectal cancers) and reduce the risk of anastomotic leak by avoiding cross stapling. In April 2018 the Norwegian hospital to whom all local; recurrences for rectal cancer are referred reported an unexpected rise in early multifocal local recurrences of 9.5% following TaTME compared with 3.4% following conventional TME leading to a nationwide moratorium on the procedure and ending, in an editorial published on the British Journal of Surgery in August 2020, by saying that other countries should consider the issue in the context of local practices and results. There are limited data concerning oncological outcomes of TaTME compared to conventional TME. The aim of this study was to report perioperative and oncological outcomes for patients with rectal cancer treated with TaTME in a high-volume, experienced UK centre.
METHODS: From January 2015 to January 2020 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed rectal cancer having TaTME at Worcestershire Royal Hospital NHS were prospectively entered into an online international registry. Patients were followed according to local protocol with clinical examination, tumour markers, endoscopy and radiology.
RESULTS: Seventy patients underwent TaTME for rectal cancer. The median distance of the tumour from the anorectal junction was 4 cm (IQR 2-5). The mesorectal margin was involved in 20 (1%) patients, all of whom received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Overall survival was 94% at a median follow-up of 15 months (IQR 9-31 months). Distant recurrence occurred in 12 (17%) of patients at a median of 14 months (IQR 10-17 months). The 18-month stoma-free survival rate was 66%.
CONCLUSIONS: A local recurrence rate of 5.7% supports the oncological safety of TaTME for rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Local recurrence; Rectal cancer; Stoma; Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME)

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33606129     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02390-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  21 in total

1.  Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer.

Authors:  B Cedermark; M Dahlberg; B Glimelius; L Påhlman; L E Rutqvist; N Wilking
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-04-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis of classic randomized controlled trials and high-quality Nonrandomized Studies in the last 5 years.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Guodong Cao; Bo Chen; Mingqing Wang; Xingyu Xu; Wenwen Cai; Yicheng Xu; Maoming Xiong
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 6.071

3.  [Corneal complications caused by amiodarone].

Authors:  J L Menezo; E Vila Mascarell
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  1971 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.753

4.  Meta-analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Shahin Hajibandeh; Shahab Hajibandeh; Mokhtar Eltair; Anil T George; Vijay Thumbe; Andrew W Torrance; Misra Budhoo; Howard Joy; Rajeev Peravali
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  W E Enker; H T Thaler; M L Cranor; T Polyak
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): a stepwise description of the surgical technique with video demonstration.

Authors:  S Atallah; M Albert; T DeBeche-Adams; G Nassif; H Polavarapu; S Larach
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Aitken
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  The impact of rectal cancer tumor height on recurrence rates and metastatic location: A competing risk analysis of a national database.

Authors:  Knut M Augestad; Deborah S Keller; Paul M Bakaki; Johnie Rose; Siran M Koroukian; Tom Øresland; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  A two-centre experience of transanal total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  N C Buchs; G Wynn; R Austin; M Penna; J M Findlay; A L A Bloemendaal; N J Mortensen; C Cunningham; O M Jones; R J Guy; R Hompes
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  The ACPGBI recommends pause for reflection on transanal total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  N S Fearnhead; A G Acheson; S R Brown; L Hancock; A Harikrishnan; S B Kelly; C A Maxwell-Armstrong; P M Sagar; S Siddiqi; C J Walsh; J M D Wheeler; J F Abercrombie
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.788

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.