Literature DB >> 33606082

High-definition videolaryngoscopy is superior to fiberoptic laryngoscopy: a 111 multi-observer study.

Constanze Scholman1, Jeroen M Westra2, Manon A Zwakenberg2, Frederik G Dikkers3, Gyorgy B Halmos2, Jan Wedman2, Jan E Wachters2, Bernard F A M van der Laan2,4, Boudewijn E C Plaat2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to analyse differences in fiberoptic laryngoscopy (FOL) versus high definition laryngoscopy (HDL) by examining videolaryngoscopy images by a large group of observers with different levels of clinical expertise in ear, nose and throat (ENT) medicine.
METHODS: This study is a 111 observer paired analysis of laryngoscopy videos during an interactive presentation. During a National Meeting of the Dutch Society of ENT/Head and Neck Surgery, observers assessed both FOL and HDL videos of nine cases with additional clinical information. Observers included 41 ENT consultants (36.9%), 34 ENT residents (30.6%), 22 researchers with Head and Neck interest (19.8%) and 14 with unspecified clinical expertise (12.6%). For both laryngoscopic techniques, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were determined for identifying a normal glottis, hyperkeratosis, radiotherapy adverse effects and squamous cell carcinoma. The sensitivities for FOL and HDL were analysed with regard to the different levels of clinical expertise.
RESULTS: The overall sensitivity for correctly identifying the specific histological entity was higher in HDL (FOL 61% vs HDL 66.3%, p < 0.05). HDL was superior to FOL in identifying a normal glottis (FOL 68.1% vs HDL 91.6%, p < 0.01) and squamous cell carcinoma (FOL 70.86% vs HDL 79.41%, p = 0.02). Residents and researchers with Head and Neck interest diagnosed laryngeal lesions more correctly with HDL (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In a large population of observers with different levels of clinical expertise, HDL is superior to FOL in identifying laryngeal lesions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fiberoptic; Laryngeal diseases; Sensitivity; Squamous cell carcinoma; Videolaryngoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33606082     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06673-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  1 in total

1.  Influence of edge enhancement applied in endoscopic systems on sharpness and noise.

Authors:  Geert Geleijnse; Bernd Rieger
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 3.758

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.