Literature DB >> 33605522

Using the faecal immunochemical test in patients with rectal bleeding: evidence from the NICE FIT study.

Georgina Hicks1, Nigel D'Souza2,3,4, Theo Georgiou Delisle2,4, Michelle Chen5, Sally C Benton6, Muti Abulafi2.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this work was to investigate whether the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) could safely rule out colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with rectal bleeding (RB).
METHOD: This was a multicentre, double-blinded diagnostic accuracy study in 50 National Health Service hospitals. Patients referred from primary care with suspected CRC on an urgent 2-week-wait pathway were asked to perform a FIT prior to colonoscopy. The primary outcome measure was the sensitivity of the FIT for CRC in patients with RB versus nonrectal bleeding symptoms (NRB). The secondary outcome measures included the diagnostic accuracy of the FIT for CRC and other serious bowel disease.
RESULTS: Of 9822 patients included in the study, 3143 (32.0%) were referred with RB. CRC was present in 4.7% of patients with RB versus 2.7% of patients with NRB (p < 0.05). Faecal haemoglobin (f-Hb) was detectable (>2 µg/g) in 44.1% of patients with RB and 33.9% with NRB (p < 0.05). In RB patients, CRC was present in 10.4% when f-Hb was >2 µg/g compared with 0.1% when f-Hb was not detected. Flexible sigmoidoscopy in this group would further reduce the risk of CRC to 0.03%. The sensitivity of the FIT for CRC in RB versus NRB groups was 98.6% (95% CI 95.2%-99.8%) vs 95.6% (91.5%-98.1%) for f-Hb >2 µg/g and 96.6% (92.2%-98.9%) vs 86.3 (80.4%-90.9%) for f-Hb >10 µg/g.
CONCLUSION: Faecal haemoglobin is not always detectable in patients with RB; 56% of patients had undetectable f-Hb (<2 µg/g) and CRC was present in 0.1%. The high sensitivity of the FIT can be used to rule out CRC in patients with RB and triage them more appropriately for investigation.
© 2021 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer; faecal immunochemical test; rectal bleeding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33605522     DOI: 10.1111/codi.15593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  6 in total

1.  Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in patients with signs or symptoms of suspected colorectal cancer (CRC): a joint guideline from the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) and the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG).

Authors:  Kevin J Monahan; Michael M Davies; Muti Abulafi; Ayan Banerjea; Brian D Nicholson; Ramesh Arasaradnam; Neil Barker; Sally Benton; Richard Booth; David Burling; Rachel Victoria Carten; Nigel D'Souza; James Edward East; Jos Kleijnen; Michael Machesney; Maria Pettman; Jenny Pipe; Lance Saker; Linda Sharp; James Stephenson; Robert Jc Steele
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 31.793

2.  Combining the quantitative faecal immunochemical test and full blood count reliably rules out colorectal cancer in a symptomatic patient referral pathway.

Authors:  Mark S Johnstone; Paul Burton; Georgios Kourounis; Jack Winter; Emilia Crighton; David Mansouri; Paul Witherspoon; Karen Smith; Stephen T McSorley
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A cohort study of duplicate faecal immunochemical testing in patients at risk of colorectal cancer from North-West England.

Authors:  Natalie Hunt; Christopher Rao; Robert Logan; Vishnu Chandrabalan; Jane Oakey; Claire Ainsworth; Neil Smith; Saswata Banerjee; Martin Myers
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Faecal immunochemical test: challenges and opportunities for cancer diagnosis in primary care.

Authors:  Mary Craig; Jeff Turner; Jared Torkington; Tom Crosby
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 6.302

5.  Role of the faecal immunochemical test in patients with risk-stratified suspected colorectal cancer symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis to inform the ACPGBI/BSG guidelines.

Authors:  Richard Booth; Rachel Carten; Nigel D'Souza; Marie Westwood; Jos Kleijnen; Muti Abulafi
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2022-10-03

6.  Alternative diagnoses and demographics associated with a raised quantitative faecal immunochemical test in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Mark S Johnstone; Gillian Miller; Grace Pang; Paul Burton; Georgios Kourounis; Jack Winter; Emilia Crighton; David Mansouri; Paul Witherspoon; Karen Smith; Stephen T McSorley
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.587

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.