Literature DB >> 33604721

Fosfomycin in continuous or prolonged infusion for systemic bacterial infections: a systematic review of its dosing regimen proposal from in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies.

Roberta Maria Antonello1, Stefano Di Bella2, Alberto Enrico Maraolo3, Roberto Luzzati1.   

Abstract

Fosfomycin (FOS) administered intravenously has been recently rediscovered for the treatment of systemic infections due to multidrug-resistant bacteria. Its pharmacokinetic properties suggest a time-dependent dosing schedule with more clinical benefits from prolonged (PI) or continuous infusion (CI) than from intermittent infusion. We revised literature concerning PI and CI FOS to identify the best dosing regimen based on current evidence. We performed a MEDLINE/PubMed search. Ninety-one studies and their pertinent references were screened. Seventeen studies were included in the present review. The activity of FOS against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria was evaluated in fourteen and five studies, respectively. Six studies evaluated FOS activity in combination with another antibiotic. Daily dosing of 12, 16, 18 or 24 g, administered with different schedules, were investigated. These regimens resulted active against the tested isolates in most cases. Emergence of resistant isolates has been shown to be preventable through the coadministration of another active antibiotic. FOS is a promising option to treat systemic infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Coadministration with another active molecule is required to prevent the emergence of resistant bacterial strains. The results of our review suggest that a therapeutic regimen including a loading dose of FOS 8 g followed by a daily dose of 16 g or 24 g CI could be the best therapeutic approach for patients with normal renal function. The dosing regimens in patients with renal insufficiency and CI or PI superiority compared with intermittent infusion in clinical settings should be further investigated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous infusion; Fosfomycin; Infection; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics; Prolonged infusion

Year:  2021        PMID: 33604721     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-021-04181-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  8 in total

1.  In vivo activity and pharmacodynamics of cefotaxime or ceftriaxone in combination with fosfomycin in fibrin clots infected with highly penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  P Chavanet; H Beloeil; A Pechinot; F Duigou; J C Buisson; M Duong; C Neuwirth; A Kazmierczak; H Portier
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Fosfomycin.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Evridiki K Vouloumanou; George Samonis; Konstantinos Z Vardakas
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Fosfomycin tromethamine. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy as a single-dose oral treatment for acute uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections.

Authors:  S S Patel; J A Balfour; H M Bryson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Fosfomycin for the treatment of multidrug-resistant, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing, Enterobacteriaceae infections: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Antonia C Kastoris; Anastasios M Kapaskelis; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 25.071

5.  Comparative efficacies of ciprofloxacin and pefloxacin alone or in combination with fosfomycin in experimental endocarditis induced by multidrug-susceptible and -resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Y Q Xiong; G Potel; J Caillon; G Stephant; F Jehl; D Bugnon; P Le Conte; D Baron; H Drugeon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Clinical significance of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of fosfomycin for the treatment of patients with systemic infections.

Authors:  Nikos Roussos; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos; George Samonis; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 5.283

7.  Pharmacokinetic profile of fosfomycin trometamol.

Authors:  T Bergan; S B Thorsteinsson; E Albini
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.544

8.  Pharmacodynamics of fosfomycin against ESBL- and/or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Fiona Fransen; Kelly Hermans; Maria J B Melchers; Claudia C M Lagarde; Joseph Meletiadis; Johan W Mouton
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.790

  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial Dose Reduction in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Myth or Real Need? A Practical Approach for Guiding Dose Optimization of Novel Antibiotics.

Authors:  Milo Gatti; Federico Pea
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 6.447

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.