Literature DB >> 33604690

Combined use of 177Lu-DOTATATE and metronomic capecitabine (Lu-X) in FDG-positive gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Silvia Nicolini1, Lisa Bodei2, Alberto Bongiovanni3, Maddalena Sansovini1, Ilaria Grassi1, Toni Ibrahim3, Manuela Monti4, Paola Caroli1, Anna Sarnelli5, Danila Diano6, Valentina Di Iorio7, Chiara Maria Grana8, Corrado Cittanti9, Federica Pieri10, Stefano Severi1, Giovanni Paganelli11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: FDG-positive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have a poorer prognosis and exhibit shorter response duration to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). The aim of this prospective phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE associated with metronomic capecitabine as a radiosensitizer agent in patients with advanced progressive FDG-positive gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) NETs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced somatostatin receptor- and FDG-positive G1-G3 GEP-NETs (Ki67 < 55%) were treated with a cumulative activity of 27.5 GBq of 177Lu-DOTATATE divided in five cycles of 5.5 GBq each every 8 weeks. Capecitabine (1000-1500 mg daily) was administered orally in the inter-cycle period between 177Lu-DOTATATE treatments. Prior to commencing capecitabine, all patients were triaged with the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) test. Only DPD-proficient individuals were enrolled. The primary objectives were disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Secondary aims included progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Treatment response was assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Toxicity was assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
RESULTS: From August 2015 to December 2016, 37 subjects were consecutively enrolled. A total of 25 (68%) were affected by pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (P-NETs), and 12 (32%) had gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs). By grading (WHO 2010 classification), 12 patients (32%) had G1 (Ki67 ≤ 2%), 22 (59%) had G2 (3% < Ki67 ≤ 20%), and 3 patients (9%) had G3 (Ki67 > 20%) NETs. Grade 3 (G3) or 4 (G4) hematological toxicity occurred in 16.2% of patients. Other G3-G4 adverse events were diarrhea in 5.4% of cases and asthenia in 5.4%. No renal toxicity was observed for the duration of follow-up. In 37 patients, 33 were evaluable for response. Objective responses included partial response (PR) in 10 patients (30%) and stable disease (SD) in 18 patients (55%), with a DCR of 85%. The median follow-up was 38 months (range 4.6-51.1 months). The median PFS was 31.4 months (17.6-45.4), and mOS was not reached.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the combination of PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE and metronomic capecitabine is active and well tolerated in patients with aggressive FDG-positive G1-G3 GEP-NETs. These data constitute the basis for a randomized study of PPRT alone vs. PRRT plus metronomic capecitabine.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  177Lu-DOTATATE; Capecitabine; Combined therapy; FDG; GEP-NETs; PRRT

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33604690      PMCID: PMC9346628          DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05236-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   10.057


  32 in total

1.  Phase 3 Trial of 177Lu-Dotatate for Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Jonathan Strosberg; Ghassan El-Haddad; Edward Wolin; Andrew Hendifar; James Yao; Beth Chasen; Erik Mittra; Pamela L Kunz; Matthew H Kulke; Heather Jacene; David Bushnell; Thomas M O'Dorisio; Richard P Baum; Harshad R Kulkarni; Martyn Caplin; Rachida Lebtahi; Timothy Hobday; Ebrahim Delpassand; Eric Van Cutsem; Al Benson; Rajaventhan Srirajaskanthan; Marianne Pavel; Jaime Mora; Jordan Berlin; Enrique Grande; Nicholas Reed; Ettore Seregni; Kjell Öberg; Maribel Lopera Sierra; Paola Santoro; Thomas Thevenet; Jack L Erion; Philippe Ruszniewski; Dik Kwekkeboom; Eric Krenning
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Long-term follow-up and role of FDG PET in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine patients treated with 177Lu-D OTATATE.

Authors:  Maddalena Sansovini; Stefano Severi; Annarita Ianniello; Silvia Nicolini; Lorenzo Fantini; Emilio Mezzenga; Fabio Ferroni; Emanuela Scarpi; Manuela Monti; Alberto Bongiovanni; Sara Cingarlini; Chiara Maria Grana; Lisa Bodei; Giovanni Paganelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Long-term tolerability of PRRT in 807 patients with neuroendocrine tumours: the value and limitations of clinical factors.

Authors:  Lisa Bodei; Mark Kidd; Giovanni Paganelli; Chiara M Grana; Ignat Drozdov; Marta Cremonesi; Christopher Lepensky; Dik J Kwekkeboom; Richard P Baum; Eric P Krenning; Irvin M Modlin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Metronomic chemotherapy: an antiangiogenic scheduling.

Authors:  B Laquente; F Viñals; J R Germà
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 5.  PET tracers for somatostatin receptor imaging of neuroendocrine tumors: current status and review of the literature.

Authors:  Camilla Bardram Johnbeck; Ulrich Knigge; Andreas Kjær
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.404

6.  Effect of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with tandem isotopes - [90Y]Y/[177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in patients with disseminated neuroendocrine tumours depending on [18F]FDG PET/CT qualification in Polish multicentre experience - do we need [18F]FDG PET/CT for qualification to PRRT?

Authors:  Anna Zemczak; Maciej Kołodziej; Paweł Gut; Leszek Królicki; Beata Kos-Kudła; Grzegorz Kamiński; Marek Ruchała; Dariusz Pawlak; Jolanta Kunikowska
Journal:  Endokrynol Pol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 1.582

7.  High prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET for metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a long-term evaluation.

Authors:  Haïfa Bahri; Lenoir Laurence; Julien Edeline; Houda Leghzali; Anne Devillers; Jean-Luc Raoul; Marc Cuggia; Habiba Mesbah; Bruno Clement; Eveline Boucher; Etienne Garin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 8.  Theranostics in neuroendocrine tumours: somatostatin receptor imaging and therapy.

Authors:  Deborah Pencharz; Gopinath Gnanasegaran; Shaunak Navalkissoor
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Use of metronomic chemotherapy in oncology: results from a national Italian survey.

Authors:  Elena Collovà; Federica Sebastiani; Elisabetta De Matteis; Daniele Generali; Gaetano Aurilio; Francesco Boccardo; Sergio Crispino; Giorgio Cruciani
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

Review 10.  Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  Irvin M Modlin; Kjell Oberg; Daniel C Chung; Robert T Jensen; Wouter W de Herder; Rajesh V Thakker; Martyn Caplin; Gianfranco Delle Fave; Greg A Kaltsas; Eric P Krenning; Steven F Moss; Ola Nilsson; Guido Rindi; Ramon Salazar; Philippe Ruszniewski; Anders Sundin
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Radioligand therapy (RLT) as neoadjuvant treatment for inoperable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a literature review.

Authors:  Luca Urso; Alberto Nieri; Ilaria Rambaldi; Angelo Castello; Licia Uccelli; Corrado Cittanti; Stefano Panareo; Irene Gagliardi; Maria Rosaria Ambrosio; Maria Chiara Zatelli; Mirco Bartolomei
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.925

2.  A prospective head-to-head comparison of 68 Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD and 68 Ga-DOTATATE in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Jiang; Qingxing Liu; Guochang Wang; Huimin Sui; Rongxi Wang; Jiarou Wang; Zhaohui Zhu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Clinical Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Clinical Practice: A Formal Consensus Exercise.

Authors:  Mirco Bartolomei; Alfredo Berruti; Massimo Falconi; Nicola Fazio; Diego Ferone; Secondo Lastoria; Giovanni Pappagallo; Ettore Seregni; Annibale Versari
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  Molecular imaging phenotyping for selecting and monitoring radioligand therapy of neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Amir Iravani; Ashwin Singh Parihar; Timothy Akhurst; Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 5.605

Review 5.  Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Targeting the Somatostatin Receptor: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Optimization Strategies.

Authors:  Niloefar Ahmadi Bidakhvidi; Karolien Goffin; Jeroen Dekervel; Kristof Baete; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Paul Clement; Eric Van Cutsem; Chris Verslype; Christophe M Deroose
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Application of FLIC model to predict adverse events onset in neuroendocrine tumors treated with PRRT.

Authors:  F Scalorbi; G Argiroffi; M Baccini; L Gherardini; V Fuoco; N Prinzi; S Pusceddu; E M Garanzini; G Centonze; M Kirienko; E Seregni; M Milione; M Maccauro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Radiolabeled Peptides-Where Are We Now.

Authors:  Mitesh Naik; Adil Al-Nahhas; Sairah R Khan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Therapeutic strategies for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: State-of-the-art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Elettra Merola; Andrea Michielan; Umberto Rozzanigo; Marco Erini; Sandro Sferrazza; Stefano Marcucci; Chiara Sartori; Chiara Trentin; Giovanni de Pretis; Franca Chierichetti
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-02-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.