Literature DB >> 33604589

CRISPR Turbo Accelerated KnockOut (CRISPy TAKO) for Rapid in vivo Screening of Gene Function.

Sonja L Plasil1, Amit Seth2, Gregg E Homanics1,2,3.   

Abstract

The development of CRISPR/Cas9 technology has vastly sped up the process of mammalian genome editing by introducing a bacterial system that can be exploited for reverse genetics-based research. However, generating homozygous functional knockout (KO) animals using traditional CRISPR/Cas9-mediated techniques requires three generations of animals. A founder animal with a desired mutation is crossed to produce heterozygous F1 offspring which are subsequently interbred to generate homozygous F2 KO animals. This study describes an adaptation of the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated method to develop a cohort of homozygous gene-targeted KO animals in one generation. A well-characterized ethanol-responsive gene, MyD88, was chosen as a candidate gene for generation of KO mice as proof-of-concept. Previous studies have reported changes in ethanol-related behavioral outcomes in MyD88 KO mice. One-cell mouse embryos were simultaneously electroporated with four gRNAs targeting a critical Exon of MyD88 along with Cas9 protein. DNA and RNA analysis of founder mice revealed a complex mix of genetic alterations, all of which were predicted to ablate MyD88 gene function. Behavioral testing confirmed the hypothesis that successful one-generation KO of MyD88 would reproduce the decreased ethanol-induced sedative/hypnotic effects and increased ethanol consumption in males that were observed in previous studies. This study additionally compared responses of Mock treatment control mice generated through electroporation to controls purchased from a vendor. No substantial behavioral changes were noted between control cohorts. Overall, the CRISPR/Cas9 KO protocol reported here, which we call CRISPR Turbo Accelerated KnockOut (CRISPy TAKO), will be useful for reverse genetic in vivo screens of gene function in whole animals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; accelerated phenotypic screening; ethanol; functional knockout; genome editing; increased mutagenesis

Year:  2020        PMID: 33604589      PMCID: PMC7889042          DOI: 10.3389/fgeed.2020.598522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Genome Ed


  21 in total

1.  Ethanol Consumption in Mice Lacking CD14, TLR2, TLR4, or MyD88.

Authors:  Yuri A Blednov; Mendy Black; Julia Chernis; Adriana Da Costa; Jody Mayfield; R Adron Harris
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Bi-allelic Loss-of-Function Variants in NUP188 Cause a Recognizable Syndrome Characterized by Neurologic, Ocular, and Cardiac Abnormalities.

Authors:  Alison M Muir; Jennifer L Cohen; Sarah E Sheppard; Pavithran Guttipatti; Tsz Y Lo; Natalie Weed; Dan Doherty; Danielle DeMarzo; Christina R Fagerberg; Lars Kjærsgaard; Martin J Larsen; Patrick Rump; Katharina Löhner; Yoel Hirsch; David A Zeevi; Elaine H Zackai; Elizabeth Bhoj; Yuanquan Song; Heather C Mefford
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Pooled In Vitro and In Vivo CRISPR-Cas9 Screening Identifies Tumor Suppressors in Human Colon Organoids.

Authors:  Birgitta E Michels; Mohammed H Mosa; Barbara I Streibl; Tianzuo Zhan; Constantin Menche; Khalil Abou-El-Ardat; Tahmineh Darvishi; Ewelina Członka; Sebastian Wagner; Jan Winter; Hind Medyouf; Michael Boutros; Henner F Farin
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 24.633

4.  Stability of inbred mouse strain differences in behavior and brain size between laboratories and across decades.

Authors:  Douglas Wahlsten; Alexander Bachmanov; Deborah A Finn; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment.

Authors:  J C Crabbe; D Wahlsten; B C Dudek
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-06-04       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Sedative and Motor Incoordination Effects of Ethanol in Mice Lacking CD14, TLR2, TLR4, or MyD88.

Authors:  Yuri A Blednov; Mendy Black; Jillian M Benavidez; Adriana Da Costa; Jody Mayfield; R Adron Harris
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  One-step generation of complete gene knockout mice and monkeys by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing with multiple sgRNAs.

Authors:  Erwei Zuo; Yi-Jun Cai; Kui Li; Yu Wei; Bang-An Wang; Yidi Sun; Zhen Liu; Jiwei Liu; Xinde Hu; Wei Wei; Xiaona Huo; Linyu Shi; Cheng Tang; Dan Liang; Yan Wang; Yan-Hong Nie; Chen-Chen Zhang; Xuan Yao; Xing Wang; Changyang Zhou; Wenqin Ying; Qifang Wang; Ren-Chao Chen; Qi Shen; Guo-Liang Xu; Jinsong Li; Qiang Sun; Zhi-Qi Xiong; Hui Yang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 25.617

8.  Refined sgRNA efficacy prediction improves large- and small-scale CRISPR-Cas9 applications.

Authors:  Maurice Labuhn; Felix F Adams; Michelle Ng; Sabine Knoess; Axel Schambach; Emmanuelle M Charpentier; Adrian Schwarzer; Juan L Mateo; Jan-Henning Klusmann; Dirk Heckl
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  No unexpected CRISPR-Cas9 off-target activity revealed by trio sequencing of gene-edited mice.

Authors:  Vivek Iyer; Katharina Boroviak; Mark Thomas; Brendan Doe; Laura Riva; Edward Ryder; David J Adams
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Genome-Wide Off-Target Analysis in CRISPR-Cas9 Modified Mice and Their Offspring.

Authors:  Yan Dong; Haimei Li; Liang Zhao; Peter Koopman; Feng Zhang; Johnny X Huang
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Advancements in Genomic and Behavioral Neuroscience Analysis for the Study of Normal and Pathological Brain Function.

Authors:  Annalisa M Baratta; Adam J Brandner; Sonja L Plasil; Rachel C Rice; Sean P Farris
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.261

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.