Literature DB >> 33604305

Metagenomic Analysis of the Gut Microbiota of Wild Mice, a Newly Identified Reservoir of Campylobacter.

Hyokeun Song1, Junhyung Kim1, Jae-Ho Guk1, Woo-Hyun Kim1, Hajin Nam2, Jun Gyo Suh2, Je Kyung Seong1, Seongbeom Cho1.   

Abstract

Campylobacter, the most common etiologic agent of zoonotic gastroenteritis in humans, is present in many reservoirs including livestock animals, wildlife, soil, and water. Previously, we reported a novel Campylobacter jejuni strain SCJK02 (MLST ST-8388) from the gut of wild mice (Micromys minutus) using culture-dependent methods. However, due to fastidious growth conditions and the presence of viable but non-culturable Campylobacter spp., it is unclear whether M. minutus is a Campylobacter reservoir. This study aimed to: 1) determine the distribution and proportion of Campylobacter spp. in the gut microbiota of wild mice using culture-independent methods and 2) investigate the gut microbiota of wild mice and the relationship of Campylobacter spp. with other gut microbes. The gut microbiota of 38 wild mice captured from perilla fields in Korea and without any clinical symptoms (18 M. minutus and 20 Mus musculus) were analyzed. Metagenomic analysis showed that 77.8% (14 of 18) of the captured M. minutus harbored Campylobacter spp. (0.24-32.92%) in the gut metagenome, whereas none of the captured M. musculus carried Campylobacter spp. in their guts. Notably, 75% (6 of 8) of M. minutus determined to be Campylobacter-negative using culture-dependent methods showed a high proportion of Campylobacter through metagenome analysis. The results of metagenome analysis and the absence of clinical symptoms suggest that Campylobacter may be a component of the normal gut flora of wild M. minutus. Furthermore, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) showed that Campylobacter was the most enriched genus in the gut microbiota of M. minutus (LDA score, 5.37), whereas Lactobacillus was the most enriched genus in M. musculus (LDA score, -5.96). The differences in the presence of Campylobacter between the two species of wild mice may be attributed to the differential abundance of Campylobacter and Lactobacillus in their respective gut microbiota. In conclusion, the results indicate that wild M. minutus may serve as a potential Campylobacter reservoir. This study presents the first metagenomics analysis of the M. minutus gut microbiota to explore its possible role as an environmental Campylobacter reservoir and provides a basis for future studies using culture-independent methods to determine the role of environmental reservoirs in Campylobacter transmission.
Copyright © 2021 Song, Kim, Guk, Kim, Nam, Suh, Seong and Cho.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Campylobacter; Lactobacillus; Micromys minutus; environmental reservoir; gut microbiota; metagenomics; transmission cycle; wild mouse

Year:  2021        PMID: 33604305      PMCID: PMC7884769          DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.596149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol        ISSN: 2235-2988            Impact factor:   5.293


  58 in total

Review 1.  Microbes in gastrointestinal health and disease.

Authors:  Andrew S Neish
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism.

Authors:  Valentina Tremaroli; Fredrik Bäckhed
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2.

Authors:  Evan Bolyen; Jai Ram Rideout; Matthew R Dillon; Nicholas A Bokulich; Christian C Abnet; Gabriel A Al-Ghalith; Harriet Alexander; Eric J Alm; Manimozhiyan Arumugam; Francesco Asnicar; Yang Bai; Jordan E Bisanz; Kyle Bittinger; Asker Brejnrod; Colin J Brislawn; C Titus Brown; Benjamin J Callahan; Andrés Mauricio Caraballo-Rodríguez; John Chase; Emily K Cope; Ricardo Da Silva; Christian Diener; Pieter C Dorrestein; Gavin M Douglas; Daniel M Durall; Claire Duvallet; Christian F Edwardson; Madeleine Ernst; Mehrbod Estaki; Jennifer Fouquier; Julia M Gauglitz; Sean M Gibbons; Deanna L Gibson; Antonio Gonzalez; Kestrel Gorlick; Jiarong Guo; Benjamin Hillmann; Susan Holmes; Hannes Holste; Curtis Huttenhower; Gavin A Huttley; Stefan Janssen; Alan K Jarmusch; Lingjing Jiang; Benjamin D Kaehler; Kyo Bin Kang; Christopher R Keefe; Paul Keim; Scott T Kelley; Dan Knights; Irina Koester; Tomasz Kosciolek; Jorden Kreps; Morgan G I Langille; Joslynn Lee; Ruth Ley; Yong-Xin Liu; Erikka Loftfield; Catherine Lozupone; Massoud Maher; Clarisse Marotz; Bryan D Martin; Daniel McDonald; Lauren J McIver; Alexey V Melnik; Jessica L Metcalf; Sydney C Morgan; Jamie T Morton; Ahmad Turan Naimey; Jose A Navas-Molina; Louis Felix Nothias; Stephanie B Orchanian; Talima Pearson; Samuel L Peoples; Daniel Petras; Mary Lai Preuss; Elmar Pruesse; Lasse Buur Rasmussen; Adam Rivers; Michael S Robeson; Patrick Rosenthal; Nicola Segata; Michael Shaffer; Arron Shiffer; Rashmi Sinha; Se Jin Song; John R Spear; Austin D Swafford; Luke R Thompson; Pedro J Torres; Pauline Trinh; Anupriya Tripathi; Peter J Turnbaugh; Sabah Ul-Hasan; Justin J J van der Hooft; Fernando Vargas; Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza; Emily Vogtmann; Max von Hippel; William Walters; Yunhu Wan; Mingxun Wang; Jonathan Warren; Kyle C Weber; Charles H D Williamson; Amy D Willis; Zhenjiang Zech Xu; Jesse R Zaneveld; Yilong Zhang; Qiyun Zhu; Rob Knight; J Gregory Caporaso
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Campylobacteriosis: the role of poultry meat.

Authors:  C P A Skarp; M-L Hänninen; H I K Rautelin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  Detection and differentiation of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in broiler chicken samples using a PCR/DNA probe membrane based colorimetric detection assay.

Authors:  N A O'Sullivan; R Fallon; C Carroll; T Smith; M Maher
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 6.  Survival mechanisms and culturability of Campylobacter jejuni under stress conditions.

Authors:  D Nathan Jackson; Bailey Davis; Sandra M Tirado; Megha Duggal; Jessica K van Frankenhuyzen; Deanna Deaville; M A K Wijesinghe; Michael Tessaro; J T Trevors
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.271

7.  Wild Mouse Gut Microbiota Promotes Host Fitness and Improves Disease Resistance.

Authors:  Stephan P Rosshart; Brian G Vassallo; Davide Angeletti; Diane S Hutchinson; Andrew P Morgan; Kazuyo Takeda; Heather D Hickman; John A McCulloch; Jonathan H Badger; Nadim J Ajami; Giorgio Trinchieri; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena; Jonathan W Yewdell; Barbara Rehermann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Culturing captures members of the soil rare biosphere.

Authors:  Ashley Shade; Clifford S Hogan; Amy K Klimowicz; Matthew Linske; Patricia S McManus; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 5.491

9.  Global trends in emerging infectious diseases.

Authors:  Kate E Jones; Nikkita G Patel; Marc A Levy; Adam Storeygard; Deborah Balk; John L Gittleman; Peter Daszak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2's q2-feature-classifier plugin.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bokulich; Benjamin D Kaehler; Jai Ram Rideout; Matthew Dillon; Evan Bolyen; Rob Knight; Gavin A Huttley; J Gregory Caporaso
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 14.650

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  From germ-free to wild: modulating microbiome complexity to understand mucosal immunology.

Authors:  Carolyn A Thomson; Sydney C Morgan; Christina Ohland; Kathy D McCoy
Journal:  Mucosal Immunol       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Characterization of captive and wild 13-lined ground squirrel cecal microbiotas using Illumina-based sequencing.

Authors:  Edna Chiang; Courtney L Deblois; Hannah V Carey; Garret Suen
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2022-01-03

3.  Environmental Perturbations during the Rehabilitation of Wild Migratory Birds Induce Gut Microbiome Alteration and Antibiotic Resistance Acquisition.

Authors:  Hyokeun Song; Saehah Yi; Woo-Hyun Kim; Jae-Ho Guk; Minjong Ha; Insik Kwak; Janghee Han; Seong-Chan Yeon; Seongbeom Cho
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-06-22

Review 4.  New insights into the microbiota of wild mice.

Authors:  Ho-Keun Kwon; Je Kyung Seong
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.957

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.