Literature DB >> 33604224

Patient Profiles in the Utilization of the CanGaroo® Envelope.

Hemal Nayak1, Andrew D Beaser2, Zaid A Aziz2.   

Abstract

Background The CanGaroo® Envelope (Aziyo Biologics, Silver Spring, MD) is intended to securely hold a cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) to create a stable environment when implanted in the body. Data on the utilization of this newly available product are limited. Objective In this study, our objective was to describe the specific profiles of patients who may benefit from the use of the CanGaroo® Envelope at the time of CIED implantation. Methods  The utilization of the CanGaroo® Envelope was assessed from January 2019 to October 2019 among a series of patients who were either undergoing de-novo CIED implantation or replacement. Results Among a total of 50 patients, the CanGaroo® Envelope was utilized in 15 (30%). Three distinct patient profiles were identified: profile 1: elderly patients with poor tissue turgor at risk of wound dehiscence or erosion; profile 2: patients with a history of previous device infection; and profile 3: patients at high risk of device infection having one or more of the following risk factors - chronic kidney disease, immunocompromised state, or diabetes mellitus. At a mean follow-up of 18 ±3 months, no CIED pocket erosion, dehiscence, or infection was noted. Conclusions Three distinct profiles of patients who could potentially benefit from the use of the CanGaroo® Envelope were identified by the implanting physicians. Long-term follow-up data, including infection and wound dehiscence rates, are necessary to further analyze the optimal utilization of the device.
Copyright © 2021, Nayak et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular implantable electronic device; cied infection; cied pocket erosion

Year:  2021        PMID: 33604224      PMCID: PMC7881828          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  9 in total

Review 1.  Extracellular matrix as an inductive scaffold for functional tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 7.012

Review 2.  Preventing cardiac implantable electronic device infections.

Authors:  Gareth J Padfield; Christian Steinberg; Matthew T Bennett; Santabhanu Chakrabarti; Marc W Deyell; Jamil Bashir; Andrew D Krahn
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Antibacterial Envelope to Prevent Cardiac Implantable Device Infection.

Authors:  Khaldoun G Tarakji; Suneet Mittal; Charles Kennergren; Ralph Corey; Jeanne E Poole; Edward Schloss; Jose Gallastegui; Robert A Pickett; Rudolph Evonich; François Philippon; Janet M McComb; Steven F Roark; Denise Sorrentino; Darius Sholevar; Edmond Cronin; Brett Berman; David Riggio; Mauro Biffi; Hafiza Khan; Marc T Silver; Jack Collier; Zayd Eldadah; David J Wright; Jeff D Lande; Daniel R Lexcen; Alan Cheng; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-03-17       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Infection control in implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices: current evidence, controversial points, and unresolved issues.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korantzopoulos; Skevos Sideris; Polychronis Dilaveris; Konstantinos Gatzoulis; John A Goudevenos
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 5.  2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction.

Authors:  Fred M Kusumoto; Mark H Schoenfeld; Bruce L Wilkoff; Charles I Berul; Ulrika M Birgersdotter-Green; Roger Carrillo; Yong-Mei Cha; Jude Clancy; Jean-Claude Deharo; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Derek Exner; Ayman A Hussein; Charles Kennergren; Andrew Krahn; Richard Lee; Charles J Love; Ruth A Madden; Hector Alfredo Mazzetti; JoEllyn Carol Moore; Jeffrey Parsonnet; Kristen K Patton; Marc A Rozner; Kimberly A Selzman; Morio Shoda; Komandoor Srivathsan; Neil F Strathmore; Charles D Swerdlow; Christine Tompkins; Oussama Wazni
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 6.343

6.  Enhanced Antimicrobial Effects of Decellularized Extracellular Matrix (CorMatrix) with Added Vancomycin and Gentamicin for Device Implant Protection.

Authors:  Thomas F Deering; Carlos Chang; Carl Snyder; Selvamuthu K Natarajan; Robert Matheny
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Low-molecular-weight peptides derived from extracellular matrix as chemoattractants for primary endothelial cells.

Authors:  F Li; W Li; S Johnson; D Ingram; M Yoder; S Badylak
Journal:  Endothelium       Date:  2004 May-Aug

8.  Macrophage participation in the degradation and remodeling of extracellular matrix scaffolds.

Authors:  Jolene E Valentin; Ann M Stewart-Akers; Thomas W Gilbert; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 9.  Age-related aspects of cutaneous wound healing: a mini-review.

Authors:  Roswitha Sgonc; Johann Gruber
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 5.140

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Risk Profiles and Outcomes of Patients Receiving Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices With and Without Antibacterial Envelopes.

Authors:  David A Woodard; Grace Kim; Kent R Nilsson
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-04

2.  Risk profiles and outcomes of patients receiving antibacterial cardiovascular implantable electronic device envelopes: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  David A Woodard; Grace Kim; Kent R Nilsson
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.