| Literature DB >> 33604133 |
Larisa R Hoffman1, Shane L Koppenhaver2, Cameron W MacDonald1, Johnny M Herrera1, Joshua Streuli1, Zachary L Visco1, Nicole Wildermuth1, Stephanie R Albin1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Quantifying muscle stiffness may aid in the diagnosis and management of individuals with muscle pathology. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to establish normative parameters and variance estimates of muscle stiffness in the gastrocnemius muscle in a resting and contracted state. A secondary aim was to identify demographic, anthropometric, medical history factors, and biomechanical factors related to muscle stiffness.Entities:
Keywords: force production; gastrocnemius; muscle; normative parameters; stiffness
Year: 2021 PMID: 33604133 PMCID: PMC7872441
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther ISSN: 2159-2896

Figure 1: Muscle Stiffness Measured in a Contracted State

Figure 2: Plantarflexion Force Production Measured in a Prone Position
Table 1: Demographics of Participants
| Demographics (N=102) | Descriptive Statistic |
|---|---|
| Age (Mean, Standard Deviation) | 26.00 (4.43) |
| Sex - Male (n, %) | 44 (42.3%) |
| Race (n, %) | |
| Native American | 1 (1%) |
| Asian | 16 (15.4%) |
| African American | 0 (0%) |
| Caucasian | 75 (72.1%) |
| Hispanic | 10 (9.6%) |
| Beck Anxiety Inventory (Mean, Standard Deviation) | 4.34 (5.11) |
| BMI (Mean, Standard Deviation) | 23.51 (3.92) |
Table 2: Normative Parameters in Muscle Stiffness of the Gastrocnemius for All Participants and By Sex in Newton/Meters
| Mean (95% CI) | Standard deviation (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| All participants (n=102) | ||
| Resting state | 300.1 (286.6, 312.3) | 68.7 (56.8, 79.2) |
| Contracted state | 504.6 (461.8, 545.1) | 208.4 (179.7, 231.1) |
| Female (n=58) | ||
| Resting state | 261.95 (250.1, 271.2) | 43.4 (34.0, 50.1) |
| Contracted state | 384.8 (347.5, 408.7) | 132.83 (96.2, 145.4) |
| Male (n=44) | ||
| Resting state | 350.3 (331.9, 370.9) | 63.6 (49.9, 76.0) |
| Contracted state | 662.6 (609.7, 781.7) | 183.7 (151.1, 209.9) |
Table 3: Association of Gastrocnemius Muscle Stiffness with Demographic, Anthropometric, and History Variables
| Resting State (95% CI) | Contracted State (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | -.606 (-.719, -.480)** | -.613 (-.757, -.437)** |
| Age | -.023 (-.166, .155) | .069 (-.091, .259) |
| BMI | -.027 (-.224, .262) | -.102 (-.245, .110) |
| Beck Anxiety Inventory | -.180 (-.312, -.032) | -.223 (-.381, -.027)* |
| Race | -.085 (-.274, .132) | -.153 (-.349, .086) |
| Exercise Frequency | .076 (-.138, .281) | .011 (-.219, .230) |
| Exercise Duration | .062 (-.152, .286) | .123 (-.100, .333) |
Notes: Sex (female = 1, male = 0); Race (Native-American = 1, Asian = 2, African American = 3, Caucasian = 4, Hispanic = 5). *p<0.05. **p<0.01.
Table 4: Association of Gastrocnemius Muscle Stiffness with Functional Variables
| Resting State (95% CI) | Contracted State (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Plantarflexion Force | .264 (.026, .461)** | .232 (.062, .387)** |
| Normalized Gait Velocity | -.066 (-.247, .130) | .050 (-.138, .247) |
| Step Length | .230 (.029, .426)* | .288 (.112, .448)** |
*p<0.05. **p<0.01.