Literature DB >> 33604083

Multimodal Imaging of Lamellar Macular Holes.

Roberto dell'Omo1, Mariaelena Filippelli1, Serena De Turris2, Andrea Govetto3, Pasquale Napolitano1, Ciro Costagliola1.   

Abstract

Evolution of imaging techniques has renewed interest in the diagnosis of lamellar macular hole (LMH) and greatly implemented the possibilities of gaining more detailed insights into its pathogenesis. Among noninvasive techniques, optical coherence tomography (OCT) is considered the primary examination modality to study LMHs, given its ability to image foveal structure and its widespread availability. OCT also allows to resolve the epiretinal materials associated with LMH, i.e., tractional epiretinal membranes (ERMs) and epiretinal proliferation (EP). En face OCT reconstructions are useful to confirm the foveal abnormalities shown by the eyes with LMH, whereas OCT angiography may reveal alterations of the size and shape of the foveal avascular zone and alterations of the density of the superficial and deep vascular plexuses. On slit-lamp biomicroscopy or fundus camera examination, LMH appears as a round or oval, reddish lesion at the center of the macula, slightly darker than the surrounding retina. The associated tractional ERM, causing wrinkling and glistening of the retinal surface, is usually readily appreciable, whereas EP is hardly apparent on biomicroscopy or fundus photography since the retina surface appears smooth. When imaged with blue fundus autofluorescence (B-FAF) imaging, LMHs are characterized by an increased autofluorescent signal, the intensity of which does not correlate with the thickness of the residual outer retinal tissue. Green reflectance and blue reflectance (BR) images clearly show the increased reflection and wrinkling of the retinal surface caused by tractional ERM associated with LMH. BR and multicolor imaging enable the visualization of EP associated with LMH in the form of a sharply demarcated dark area and in the form of a yellowish area surrounding the hole, respectively. Scarce data regarding invasive imaging techniques, such as fluorescein angiography, for the study of LMH are available in the literature. The aim of this review is to evaluate the contribution that each imaging modality can provide to study the morphologic characteristics of LMH.
Copyright © 2021 Roberto dell'Omo et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33604083      PMCID: PMC7868145          DOI: 10.1155/2021/8820444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2090-004X            Impact factor:   1.909


  41 in total

1.  Re-accumulation of macular pigment after successful macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Ferdinando Bottoni; Emma Zanzottera; Elisa Carini; Matteo Cereda; Mario Cigada; Giovanni Staurenghi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Diagnosis of macular pseudoholes and lamellar macular holes by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Belkacem Haouchine; Pascale Massin; Ramin Tadayoni; Ali Erginay; Alain Gaudric
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Analysis of visual pigment by fundus autofluorescence.

Authors:  T Theelen; T T J M Berendschot; C J F Boon; C B Hoyng; B J Klevering
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Role of Lamellar Hole-Associated Epiretinal Proliferation in Lamellar Macular Holes.

Authors:  Roberto dell'Omo; Gianni Virgili; Stanislao Rizzo; Serena De Turris; Giovanni Coclite; Dario Giorgio; Ermanno dell'Omo; Ciro Costagliola
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 5.  Optical coherence tomography-based consensus definition for lamellar macular hole.

Authors:  Jean Pierre Hubschman; Andrea Govetto; Richard F Spaide; Ricarda Schumann; David Steel; Marta S Figueroa; Jerry Sebag; Alain Gaudric; Giovanni Staurenghi; Christos Haritoglou; Kazuaki Kadonosono; John T Thompson; Stanley Chang; Ferdinando Bottoni; Ramin Tadayoni
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Visualization of Lamellar Hole-Associated Epiretinal Proliferation With Blue-Reflectance Imaging.

Authors:  Roberto dellʼOmo; Serena De Turris; Ermanno dellʼOmo; Ciro Costagliola
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Choriocapillaris layer imaging with swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography in lamellar and full-thickness macular hole.

Authors:  Jaemoon Ahn; Gyeongmin Yoo; Jee Taek Kim; Seong-Woo Kim; Jaeryung Oh
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Comparing functional and morphologic characteristics of lamellar macular holes with and without lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation.

Authors:  Claudine E Pang; Richard F Spaide; K Bailey Freund
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  Evidence of Carotenoid in Surgically Removed Lamellar Hole-Associated Epiretinal Proliferation.

Authors:  Akira Obana; Hiroyuki Sasano; Shigetoshi Okazaki; Yoshiro Otsuki; Takahiko Seto; Yuko Gohto
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Clinical spectrum of lamellar macular defects including pseudoholes and pseudocysts defined by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  J C Chen; L R Lee
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Primary Lamellar Macular Holes: To Vit or Not to Vit.

Authors:  Lihteh Wu; Ryan Bradshaw
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.