Melanie A Pienaar1, Marianne Reid1. 1. School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Self-management is the backbone of diabetes care. For the patient with type 2 diabetes, this implies making decisions about a healthy diet, regular exercise and taking treatment appropriately. Some patients may experience barriers to the self-management of diabetes, such as lack of support. In this respect, peer support has been identified as a promising strategy in the self-management of diabetes. AIM: The study aimed to explore the experiences of adults with type 2 diabetes who took part in a diabetes peer support intervention in the Free State, South Africa. Such information may lead to the development of practical methods for diabetes self-management and control. METHODS: Twelve purposively sampled Sesotho-speaking women (aged 51-84 years) participated in the Mmogo-method®, a visual-based narrative enquiry. Textual data from audio recordings of discussions, visual data from photographs of constructions and field notes were triangulated and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Participants described the peer support intervention as very valuable. They regarded community health workers as an important source of support. Three themes emerged from the intervention: positive lifestyle changes, continuous support, and improved confidence and sense of connectedness. This was a significant finding reported in patients with diabetes, as it will contribute to successfully sustaining effective self-management behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: Peer support for patients with type 2 diabetes appeared to be a valued intervention, as participants related well to community health workers, who are ideally positioned in the healthcare system to provide the service.
BACKGROUND: Self-management is the backbone of diabetes care. For the patient with type 2 diabetes, this implies making decisions about a healthy diet, regular exercise and taking treatment appropriately. Some patients may experience barriers to the self-management of diabetes, such as lack of support. In this respect, peer support has been identified as a promising strategy in the self-management of diabetes. AIM: The study aimed to explore the experiences of adults with type 2 diabetes who took part in a diabetes peer support intervention in the Free State, South Africa. Such information may lead to the development of practical methods for diabetes self-management and control. METHODS: Twelve purposively sampled Sesotho-speaking women (aged 51-84 years) participated in the Mmogo-method®, a visual-based narrative enquiry. Textual data from audio recordings of discussions, visual data from photographs of constructions and field notes were triangulated and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Participants described the peer support intervention as very valuable. They regarded community health workers as an important source of support. Three themes emerged from the intervention: positive lifestyle changes, continuous support, and improved confidence and sense of connectedness. This was a significant finding reported in patients with diabetes, as it will contribute to successfully sustaining effective self-management behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: Peer support for patients with type 2 diabetes appeared to be a valued intervention, as participants related well to community health workers, who are ideally positioned in the healthcare system to provide the service.
Authors: Gayathri Embuldeniya; Paula Veinot; Emma Bell; Mary Bell; Joyce Nyhof-Young; Joanna E M Sale; Nicky Britten Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2013-02-28
Authors: C Ju; R Shi; L Yao; X Ye; M Jia; J Han; T Yang; Q Lu; H Jin; X Cai; S Yuan; B Xie; X Yu; M M Coufal; E B Fisher; Z Sun Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Briana D Lott; Tanisha N Dicks; Shimrit Keddem; Valerie S Ganetsky; Judy A Shea; Judith A Long Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Lisa K Micklesfield; Estelle V Lambert; David John Hume; Sarah Chantler; Paula R Pienaar; Kasha Dickie; Thandi Puoane; Julia H Goedecke Journal: Cardiovasc J Afr Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 1.167
Authors: David Simmons; A Toby Prevost; Chris Bunn; Daniel Holman; Richard A Parker; Simon Cohn; Sarah Donald; Charlotte A M Paddison; Candice Ward; Peter Robins; Jonathan Graffy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 3.240