Literature DB >> 33604053

Draft genome and description of Mixta mediterraneensis strain Marseille-Q2057T sp.nov., a new bacterium isolated from human healthy skin.

M Boxberger1,2, A Antezack1,2, S Magnien1,2, N Cassir1,2, B La Scola1,2.   

Abstract

In 2019, by culturing a skin swab from the hand of a 30-year-old healthy woman using the culturomic method, we isolated the new bacterial strain Marseille-Q2057T (= CSUR-Q2057). Matrix-assisted desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) failed to identify this isolate. Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene and Genome-to-Genome comparison suggested that this taxon belongs to a novel bacterial species within the family Erwiniaceae, phylum Proteobacteria. We describe here its main phenotypic characteristics, genome sequence and annotation of Mixta mediterraneensis strain Marseille-Q2057T, a new member of the Mixta genus, that we propose as type strain.
© 2021 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteria; Mixta mediterraneensis; culturomics; genome; sp. nov.; species; taxonogenomics

Year:  2021        PMID: 33604053      PMCID: PMC7876563          DOI: 10.1016/j.nmni.2021.100840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Microbes New Infect        ISSN: 2052-2975


Introduction

The genus Mixta was created in 2018 to resolve certain approximations in the taxonomy of the Erwiniaceae family, in the light of recent advances in combined genomic and phylogeny approaches [1]. Mixta mediterraneensis strain Marseille-Q2057T was isolated using the culturomics approach, based on the use of a large panel of culture conditions to describe the microbial composition of a sample by high-throughput culture [[2], [3], [4]] A taxonogenomics approach, including matrix-assisted laser desorption–ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), phylogenetic analysis, main phenotypic description and genome sequencing, was used to describe this species [2,5].

Materials and methods

Strain isolation and phenotypic tests

Mixta mediterraneensis strain Marseille-Q2057T was initially isolated by direct seeding of 50 μL of sample on an Acinetobacter-specific medium [6] incubated in aerobiosis at 31°C, MALDI-TOF MS protein analysis was carried out using a Microflex spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) [7]. Spectra from strain Marseille-Q2057T were imported into the MALDI BioTyper software (version 3.0, Bruker) and analysed by standard pattern matching (with default parameter settings). The study was validated by the ethics committee Sud-Est IV under number ID-RCB: 2019-A01508-49. Different growth temperatures (30°C, 37°C, 45°C and 56°C), atmospheric conditions—anaerobic, aerobic and microaerophilic (CampyGEN, Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) and pH (5, 6.5, 7.5, 8.5) were tested. API ZYM, API 20E and API 50 CH strips (BioMérieux, Marcy L’Étoile, France) were used to evaluate the biochemical properties of the strain according to the manufacturer's instructions. For scanning electronic microscopy, a colony was collected from agar and immersed into a 2.5% glutaraldehyde fixative solution. The slide was gently washed in water; air-dried and examined to evaluate bacterial structure on a TM4000 microscope approximately 60 cm in height and 33 cm in width. The standard disc method was applied for antimicrobial susceptibility testing according to the French Microbiology Society. Motility test was performed using the semi-solid TCC media as described by Tittsler and Sandholzer [8].

Genome sequencing

Genomic DNA (gDNA) of M. mediterraneensis strain Marseille-Q2057T was extracted in two steps: a mechanical treatment was first performed with glass beads acid-washed (G4649-500g; Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) using a FastPrep-24™ 5G Grinder (mpBio, Irvine, CA, USA) at maximum speed (6.5) for 90 seconds. Then after 30 minutes of lysozyme incubation at 37°C, DNA was extracted on the EZ1 biorobot (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with an EZ1 DNA tissues kit. The elution volume was 50 μL. The gDNA of M. mediterraneensis strain Marseille-Q2057T was quantified by a Qubit assay with the high sensitivity kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) to 0.2 ng/μL. Genomic DNA was next sequenced on the MiSeq Technology (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) with the paired end strategy and was barcoded in order to be mixed respectively with 21 other genomic projects prepared with the Nextera XT DNA sample prep kit (Illumina). To prepare the paired end library, dilution was performed to require 1ng of each genome as input to prepare the paired end library. The ‘tagmentation’ step fragmented and tagged the DNA. Then limited cycle PCR amplification (12 cycles) completed the tag adapters and introduced dual-index barcodes. After purification on AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA), the libraries were then normalized on specific beads according to the Nextera XT protocol (Illumina). Normalized libraries were pooled into a single library for sequencing on the MiSeq. The pooled single strand library was loaded onto the reagent cartridge and then onto the instrument along with the flow cell. Automated cluster generation and paired end sequencing with dual index reads were performed in a single 39-hour run in 2 × 250 bp. Total information of 4.5 Gb was obtained from a 462 K/mm2 cluster density with a cluster passing quality control filters of 93.9%. Within this run, the index representation for M. mediterraneensis strain Marseille-Q2057T was determined to index 3.06%. The 9 045 583 paired end reads were filtered according to the read qualities. To improve the quality of the assembly, an Oxford Nanopore approach was performed on 1D gDNA sequencing for the MinIon device using an SQK-LSK109 kit. The library was constructed from 1-μg gDNA without fragmentation and end repair. Adapters were ligated to both ends of gDNA. After purification on AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter), the library was quantified by a Qubit assay with the high sensitivity kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). A total of 1376 active pores were detected for the sequencing and the workflow WIMP was chosen for bioinformatic analysis in live. After 2 hours as run time and end life of the flowcell, 325,41K reads as raw data were generated.

Genome annotation and genome comparison

Genome annotation was obtain through the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline [7]. The genome sequence data were uploaded to the Type (Strain) Genome Server (TYGS), a free bioinformatics platform available under https://tygs.dsmz.de, for a whole genome-based taxonomic analysis [9]. Determination of closest type strain genomes was performed in two complementary ways: first, all user genomes were compared against all type strain genomes available in the TYGS database via the MASH algorithm, a fast approximation of intergenomic relatedness [10], and, the ten type strains with the smallest MASH distances chosen per user genome. Second, an additional set of ten closely related type strains was determined via the 16S rDNA gene sequences. These were extracted from the user genomes using RNAmmer [11] and each sequence was subsequently BLASTed [12] against the 16S rDNA gene sequence of each of the currently 12 983 type strains available in the TYGS database. This was used as a proxy to find the best 50 matching type strains (according to the bitscore) for each user genome and to subsequently calculate precise distances using the Genome BLAST Distance Phylogeny approach (GBDP) under the algorithm ‘coverage’ and distance formula d5 [13]. These distances were finally used to determine the ten closest type strain genomes for each of the user genomes. All pairwise comparisons among the set of genomes were conducted using GBDP and accurate intergenomic distances inferred under the algorithm ‘trimming’ and distance formula d5. One hundred distance replicates were calculated each. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization values and confidence intervals were calculated using the recommended settings of the GGDC2. Complementarily, the degree of genomic similarity of strain Marseille-Q2057 with closely related species was estimated using OrthoANI software with default parameters [14], the nine closest species were determined on a DNA–DNA hybridization basis. Antibiotic-resistance genes and presence of pathogenesis-related proteins was investigated using the ABRicate tools v1.0.1 against ARG-ANNOT [15], EcOH [16], NCBI Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance reference Gene Database [17], PlasmidFinder [18], Resfinder [19], CARD [20] and VFDB [21] using the Online Galaxy platform [22].

Results

Strain identification and classification

Mixta mediterraneensis strain Marseille-Q2057T was isolated from the hand skin swab of a 30 -year-old healthy woman. Mixta mediterraneensis strain Marseille-Q2057T was not identified by our systematic MALDI-TOF MS screening, suggesting that the corresponding species was not in the database (https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/acces-ressources/base-de-donnees/urms-data-base/) (Fig. 1); it analysed within the closest members of Erwiniaceae on the IHU databases available spectra and did not belong to any known cluster (Fig. 2). Moreover, strain Marseille-Q2057T exhibited 97.66% 16S rRNA sequence similarity with Mixta gaviniae strain DSM 22758 (extracted from the genome accessible CP026377.1), the phylogenetically closest bacterium with standing in nomenclature (Fig. 3a) Furthermore, digital DNA–DNA hybridization revealed a maximum identity similarity of only 23.6% (Fig. 3b and Table 1) and an OrthoANI parameter provided a value of 80.76% (Fig. 4) between the novel organism and Pantoea conspicua LMG 24534 (GCA_002095315). Taken altogether these results confirm the status of this strain as a new member of the Mixta genus for which the name Mixta mediterraneensis strain Marseille-Q2057T is proposed.
Fig. 1

MALDI-TOF MS reference mass spectrum. Spectra from 12 individual colonies of strain Marseille-Q2057T were compared and a reference spectrum was generated.

Fig. 2

MALDI-TOF MS dendrogram highlighting the position of Mixta mediterraneensis sp. nov. within Erwiniaceae family most closely related species.

Fig. 3

(a) 16s rRNA-based phylogenetic tree, and (b) whole-genome-based phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Mixta mediterraneensis sp. nov., strain Marseille-Q2057T relative to other closely related bacterial taxa. Trees were generated with FastME 2.1.6.1 [24] from Genome BLAST Distance Phylogeny (GBDP) distances calculated from genome sequences our 16S sequences. The branch lengths are scaled in terms of GBDP distance formula d5. The numbers above branches are GBDP pseudo-bootstrap support values > 60% from 100 replications, with an average branch support of 66.6%. The tree was rooted at the midpoint [25].

Table 1

Digital DNA–DNA hybridization values obtained by sequence comparison of all studied genomes using TYGS comparison server using the second formula

Subject straindDDH (%) with Mixta mediterraneensis95% CIG+C content difference (in %)
Pantoea conspicua LMG 2453423.621.3–26.03.8
Pantoea brenneri LMG 534323.621.3–26.03.99
Pantoea vagans LMG 2419923.220.9–25.63.58
[Curtobacterium] plantarum LMG 162222320.7–25.43.3
Pantoea agglomerans NBRC 1024702320.7–25.43.36
Pantoea eucalypti LMG 2419722.820.5–25.22.51
Pantoea stewartii CCUG 2635922.720.4–25.21.83
Pantoea anthophila LMG 255822.620.4–25.15.01
Pantoea ananatis LMG 266521.919.6–24.31.64
Pectobacterium betavasculorum NCPPB 279521.118.9–23.50.6
Pantoea rwandensis LMG 2627520.818.6–23.30.85
Mixta theicola DSM 2921220.718.5–23.12.23
Pantoea eucrina LMG 534620.718.4–23.14.5
Mixta gaviniae DSM 2275820.618.4–23.16.28
Mixta calida LMG 2538320.518.3–22.95.22
Phytobacter diazotrophicus DSM 1780620.518.3–23.01.29
Erwinia amylovora CFBP 123220.117.9–22.51.81
Escherichia hermannii NBRC 105704T20.117.9–22.52.32
Kosakonia oryzendophytica REICA 08219.917.7–22.31.97

Abbreviation: dDDH, digital DNA–DNA hybridization.

Fig. 4

Heatmap generated with ORTHOANI values calculated using the OAT software between Mixta mediterraneensis sp. nov., strain Marseille-Q2057T and other closely related species with standing in nomenclature.

MALDI-TOF MS reference mass spectrum. Spectra from 12 individual colonies of strain Marseille-Q2057T were compared and a reference spectrum was generated. MALDI-TOF MS dendrogram highlighting the position of Mixta mediterraneensis sp. nov. within Erwiniaceae family most closely related species. (a) 16s rRNA-based phylogenetic tree, and (b) whole-genome-based phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Mixta mediterraneensis sp. nov., strain Marseille-Q2057T relative to other closely related bacterial taxa. Trees were generated with FastME 2.1.6.1 [24] from Genome BLAST Distance Phylogeny (GBDP) distances calculated from genome sequences our 16S sequences. The branch lengths are scaled in terms of GBDP distance formula d5. The numbers above branches are GBDP pseudo-bootstrap support values > 60% from 100 replications, with an average branch support of 66.6%. The tree was rooted at the midpoint [25]. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization values obtained by sequence comparison of all studied genomes using TYGS comparison server using the second formula Abbreviation: dDDH, digital DNA–DNA hybridization. Heatmap generated with ORTHOANI values calculated using the OAT software between Mixta mediterraneensis sp. nov., strain Marseille-Q2057T and other closely related species with standing in nomenclature.

Phenotypic characteristics

Growth of M. mediterraneensis strain Marseille-Q2057T was initially isolated by direct seeding of 50 μL of sample on Acinetobacter-specific medium [6] incubated in aerobiosis at 31°C. Colonies from strain Marseille-Q2057T showed a beige pigmentation and no hemolysis. Bacterial cells were Gram-negative, motile bacilli with a length of about 3.8 μm and a width of about 0.8 μm determined by electronic scanning microscopy (Fig. 5). Strain Marseille-Q2057T is aerobic, anaerobic and microaerophilic. Optimum pH of this bacterium is comprised between pH 5 and pH 7.5. The sporulation test (20 minutes at 80°C) was negative. Using API strips, positive reactions were shown for alkaline phosphatase, leucine arylamidase, acid phosphatase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, β-glucuronidase, sodium pyruvate, carbon substrate, d-glucose, d-fructose, d-mannose, N-acetyl glucosamine, esculin, d-trehalose. All other reactions tested were negative. In addition, this bacterium was catalase positive and oxidase negative. These results are summarized in Table 2).
Fig. 5

Scanning electron microscopy of Mixta mediterraneensis sp. nov., strain Marseille-Q2057T using a Tabletop microscope TM 4000 plus (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The scale bar represents 5 μm.

Table 2

Differential characteristics of Mixta mediterraneensis strain Marseille-Q2057 and its most closely related species with standing in nomenclature

PropertiesMixta mediterraneensis
Pantoea conspicua
Pantoea brenneri
Pantoea vagans
[Curtobacterium] plantarum
Pantoea agglomerans
Marseille-Q2057LMG 24534LMG 5343LMG 24199LMG 16222NBRC 102470
Cell size0.8 × 3.8 μm0.9 × 1.5–3.0 μm0.9 × 1.5–3.0 μm0.9 × 1.5–3.0 μm0.3–0.5 × 0.6–3.0 μmNA
Oxygen requirementfacultativefacultativefacultativefacultative+facultative
Gram stain+
Motility+++++
Endospore formationNA
Optimum temperature for growth (°C)31°C28°C–30°C28°C–30°CNA28°C–30°C30°C
Production of:
 Alkaline phosphatase+NANANANANA
 Catalase+NANANANANA
 OxidaseNA
 α-GlucosidaseNANANANANA
 β-Galactosidase+NANA+NA+
Acid from:
 N-Acetylglucosamine++++++
 l-arabinose+++++
 d-ribose+++++
 d-mannose++++++
 d-mannitol+++++
 d-glucose+++++NA
 d-fructose++++++
 d-maltose+++++
 d-lactose+++/–
 G+C content (mol%)51.7655.755.455.455.155.1
HabitatHealthy human skinHuman blood sampleHuman blood samplePlants, humans, food productsLeaves of various plantsPlant surfaces, seeds, water, humans (wounds, blood, urine, internal organs) and animals
Differential characteristics of Mixta mediterraneensis strain Marseille-Q2057 and its most closely related species with standing in nomenclature Scanning electron microscopy of Mixta mediterraneensis sp. nov., strain Marseille-Q2057T using a Tabletop microscope TM 4000 plus (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The scale bar represents 5 μm.

Genome properties

The genome of strain Marseille-Q2057 was 4 532 310 bp long with a 51.76% G+C content. The genome assembly of this strain was achieved on 34 contigs. Of the 4537 predicted genes, 4067 were protein-coding genes and 108 were RNAs (7 16S rRNA, 8 additional 5S rRNAs, 7 additional 23S rRNAs, 77 tRNAs and 9 ncRNAs) (Fig. 6). The distribution of genes into clusters of orthologous groups (COGs) functional categories for strain Marseille-Q2057T and other closely related bacterial taxa is detailed in Table 3. Analysis of the COGs categories shows that the mobilome, amino acid transport and metabolism elements of the strain Marseille-Q2057 appear to be the more numerous putative functions (by COGs) (412 in category X, 343 in category E, respectively). Through this analysis, we can see that the repartition of all COG categories is similar across these species (Fig. 7 and Table 3). The in silico resistome of the strain Marseille-Q2057T and the search for virulence factors [21] of this strain showed on the 7 contig an 85.77% identity gene with Crp gene that could be implied in fluoroquinolone, macrolide and penam resistance (using CARD). Two IncFII plasmids were detected on the 18 and 19 contigs.
Fig. 6

Graphical circular map of the genome from Mixta mediterraneensis strain Marseille-Q2057T obtained by CGView Server online tool [26].

Table 3

Detailed functional classes of predicted genes according to the clusters of orthologous groups of proteins of Mixta mediterraneensis sp. nov. other closely related bacterial taxa

Pantoea agglomerans NBRC 102470 (NZ_BCZA01000001.1)Pantoea vagans strain LMG 24199 (NZ_CP038853.1)Pantoea brenneri strain LMG 5343 (NZ_MIEI01000001.1)Pantoea conspicua strain LMG 24534 (NZ_MLFN01000001.1)[Curtobacterium] plantarum strain LMG 16222 (NZ_RHDS01000001.1)Pantoea stewartii strain CCUG 26359 (NZ_VZPF01000001.1)Mixta mediterraneensis strain Q2057
Information storage and processing
 [J] Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis265259284264268264250
 [A] RNA processing and modification1111111
 [K] Transcription378376402330403351277
 [L] Replication, recombination and repair138134177155154201224
 [B] Chromatin structure and dynamics0000000
Cellular processes and signalling
 [D] Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning48485553505153
 [Y] Nuclear structure0000000
 [V] Defence mechanisms104105114891068185
 [T] Signal transduction mechanisms241241256226251248181
 [M] Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis272287302273286270280
 [N] Cell motility10610610396108136101
 [Z] Cytoskeleton0000000
 [W] Extracellular structures20192119211927
 [U] Intracellular trafficking, secretion and vesicular transport71868055878572
 [O] Post-translational modification, protein turnover, chaperones152151171144161150145
 [X] Mobilome: prophages, transposons3740643764198412
Metabolism
 [C] Energy production and conversion194202239200202184180
 [G] Carbohydrate transport and metabolism411405478420423402342
 [E] Amino acid transport and metabolism411442453423426392343
 [F] Nucleotide transport and metabolism11010811310710810697
 [H] Coenzyme transport and metabolism203213224195209188182
 [I] Lipid transport and metabolism136144167135140128136
 [P] Inorganic ion transport and metabolism266282307273277243214
 [Q] Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism859710276936464
Poorly characterized
 [R] General function prediction only383394432359411334266
 [S] Function unknown228233238219236214219
Hypothetical protein6146327946538141298980
Fig. 7

Distribution of functional classes of predicted genes according to the clusters of orthologous groups of proteins of Mixta mediterraneensis sp. nov. other closely related bacterial taxa.

Graphical circular map of the genome from Mixta mediterraneensis strain Marseille-Q2057T obtained by CGView Server online tool [26]. Detailed functional classes of predicted genes according to the clusters of orthologous groups of proteins of Mixta mediterraneensis sp. nov. other closely related bacterial taxa Distribution of functional classes of predicted genes according to the clusters of orthologous groups of proteins of Mixta mediterraneensis sp. nov. other closely related bacterial taxa.

Discussion and conclusion

In the past 8 years, a culturomic approach has led to the discovery of more than 500 bacterial species [2]. Using the taxonogenomics concept, i.e. the combination of the genomic and phenotypic properties of a putative new taxon [23], we have characterized a new bacterial species representing a new species within the family Erwiniaceae found on human hand skin. It was named as M. mediterraneensis strain Marseille-Q2057T. Members of Erwiniaceae are commonly found associated with plants, so it is reasonable to think that our species, found on skin, is part of the transient cutaneous microbiota (see Table 4).
Table 4

Description of Mixta mediterraneensis sp. nov. strain Marseille-Q2057T

Species namemediterraneensis
Genus nameMixta
Specific epithetMixta
Species statussp.nov
Species etymologyMix'ta N.L. fem. n. Mixta, the mixed one, referring to the mixed lifestyles of species in the genus. Me.di.ter.ra.ne.en′sis, L. masc. adj., mediterraneensis, ‘of Mediterraneum,’ the Latin name of the Mediterranean Sea by which Marseille is located and the bacteria isolated.
AuthorsManon Boxberger, Angéline Antezack, Sibylle Magnien, Nadim Cassir, Bernard La Scola
Designation of the type strainMarseille-Q2057
Strain collection numberCSUR-Q2057
16S rRNA gene accession numberMW177953
Genome accession numberJACFXY000000000.1
Genome statusDraft
Genome size4 532 310 -bp
GC%51.76
Country of originMarseille, France
Date of isolation2019
Source of isolationHuman healthy skin
Growth medium, incubationAcinetobacter-specific medium [6]
Conditions used for standard cultivation31°C in aerobiosis
Gram stainNegative
Cell shapeRods
Cell size3.8 μm and a width of about 0.8 μm
MotilityMotile
SporulationNon-sporulating
Colony morphologyCircular
Temperature range21°C–56°C
Temperature optimum31°C
Relationship to O2Facultative aerobe
O2 for strain testingStrictly aerobe
Oxidase
Catalase+
Description of Mixta mediterraneensis sp. nov. strain Marseille-Q2057T Mix'ta N.L. fem. n. Mixta, the mixed one, referring to the mixed lifestyles of species in the genus. Me.di.ter.ra.ne.en′sis, L. masc. adj., mediterraneensis, ‘of Mediterraneum,’ the Latin name of the Mediterranean Sea by which Marseille is located and the bacteria isolated.

Deposit in culture collections and sequences database

Mixta mediterraneensis strain Marseille-Q2057T, was deposited in CSUR collections under accession CSUR-Q2057. The 16S rRNA and genome sequences are available under accession numbers MW177953 and JACFXY000000000.1, respectively.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding sources

MB is PhD granted by the collaboration between M&L Laboratories and referenced PVM:2018-200. This study was supported by the French State managed by the National Research Agency under the Investissements d'avenir (Investments for the Future) programme under the reference ANR-10-IAHU-03 (Méditerranée Infection) and by the and the European funding PRIMI.
  25 in total

Review 1.  The impact of culturomics on taxonomy in clinical microbiology.

Authors:  Rita Abou Abdallah; Mamadou Beye; Awa Diop; Sofiane Bakour; Didier Raoult; Pierre-Edouard Fournier
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.271

Review 2.  A polyphasic strategy incorporating genomic data for the taxonomic description of novel bacterial species.

Authors:  Dhamodharan Ramasamy; Ajay Kumar Mishra; Jean-Christophe Lagier; Roshan Padhmanabhan; Morgane Rossi; Erwin Sentausa; Didier Raoult; Pierre-Edouard Fournier
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing.

Authors:  Alessandra Carattoli; Ea Zankari; Aurora García-Fernández; Mette Voldby Larsen; Ole Lund; Laura Villa; Frank Møller Aarestrup; Henrik Hasman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Culturing the human microbiota and culturomics.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Lagier; Grégory Dubourg; Matthieu Million; Frédéric Cadoret; Melhem Bilen; Florence Fenollar; Anthony Levasseur; Jean-Marc Rolain; Pierre-Edouard Fournier; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions.

Authors:  Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Alexander F Auch; Hans-Peter Klenk; Markus Göker
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  VFDB: a reference database for bacterial virulence factors.

Authors:  Lihong Chen; Jian Yang; Jun Yu; Zhijian Yao; Lilian Sun; Yan Shen; Qi Jin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The CGView Server: a comparative genomics tool for circular genomes.

Authors:  Jason R Grant; Paul Stothard
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash.

Authors:  Brian D Ondov; Todd J Treangen; Páll Melsted; Adam B Mallonee; Nicholas H Bergman; Sergey Koren; Adam M Phillippy
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline.

Authors:  Tatiana Tatusova; Michael DiCuccio; Azat Badretdin; Vyacheslav Chetvernin; Eric P Nawrocki; Leonid Zaslavsky; Alexandre Lomsadze; Kim D Pruitt; Mark Borodovsky; James Ostell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes.

Authors:  Valeria Bortolaia; Rolf S Kaas; Etienne Ruppe; Marilyn C Roberts; Stefan Schwarz; Vincent Cattoir; Alain Philippon; Rosa L Allesoe; Ana Rita Rebelo; Alfred Ferrer Florensa; Linda Fagelhauer; Trinad Chakraborty; Bernd Neumann; Guido Werner; Jennifer K Bender; Kerstin Stingl; Minh Nguyen; Jasmine Coppens; Basil Britto Xavier; Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Henrik Westh; Mette Pinholt; Muna F Anjum; Nicholas A Duggett; Isabelle Kempf; Suvi Nykäsenoja; Satu Olkkola; Kinga Wieczorek; Ana Amaro; Lurdes Clemente; Joël Mossong; Serge Losch; Catherine Ragimbeau; Ole Lund; Frank M Aarestrup
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 5.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.