Literature DB >> 33603964

Derivatization Design of Synthetically Accessible Space for Optimization: In Silico Synthesis vs Deep Generative Design.

Gergely M Makara1, László Kovács1, István Szabó1, Gábor Pőcze1.   

Abstract

Molecular design is of utmost importance in lead optimization programs ultimately determining the fate of the project and the speed to reach preclinical stage. Newly designed lead analogues or new chemotypes must successfully address the challenges in the multidimensional optimization process throughout several optimization cycles. The speed, quality, and creativity of the designs can have a major impact on the cycle time, the number of required cycles, and the number of compounds needed to be synthesized and evaluated that in combination affect the overall timeline and cost of the lead optimization phase. Recently, a new concept, generative design with deep learning, has become popular for de novo design of project relevant analogue sets. We have developed a de novo design technology called "derivatization design" that applies artificial-intelligence-assisted forward in silico synthesis for the generation of near neighbor lead analogues as well as scaffold variations. The several attractive features of the methodology include synthetic feasibility, reagent availability and cost data associated with each new molecule; thus, detailed synthetic assessment is automatically generated during the design. As a result, these practically important data types can become an early part of the ranking and selection process for cycle time reduction. The power of derivatization design is demonstrated in a simple design study of DDR1 inhibitors and comparison of the produced molecules to a recently published data set obtained with deep generative design.
© 2021 American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33603964      PMCID: PMC7883369          DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett        ISSN: 1948-5875            Impact factor:   4.345


  36 in total

1.  Computer-assisted design of complex organic syntheses.

Authors:  E J Corey; W T Wipke
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-10-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Novel Scaffold FingerPrint (SFP): applications in scaffold hopping and scaffold-based selection of diverse compounds.

Authors:  Obdulia Rabal; Fares Ibrahim Amr; Julen Oyarzabal
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 3.  Computer-Assisted Synthetic Planning: The End of the Beginning.

Authors:  Sara Szymkuć; Ewa P Gajewska; Tomasz Klucznik; Karol Molga; Piotr Dittwald; Michał Startek; Michał Bajczyk; Bartosz A Grzybowski
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility.

Authors:  Monya Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Assessing the impact of generative AI on medicinal chemistry.

Authors:  W Patrick Walters; Mark Murcko
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Automated De Novo Design in Medicinal Chemistry: Which Types of Chemistry Does a Generative Neural Network Learn?

Authors:  Christoph Grebner; Hans Matter; Alleyn T Plowright; Gerhard Hessler
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Discovery and optimization of 3-(2-(Pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-6-yl)ethynyl)benzamides as novel selective and orally bioavailable discoidin domain receptor 1 (DDR1) inhibitors.

Authors:  Mingshan Gao; Lei Duan; Jinfeng Luo; Lianwen Zhang; Xiaoyun Lu; Yan Zhang; Zhang Zhang; Zhengchao Tu; Yong Xu; Xiaomei Ren; Ke Ding
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 8.  Rethinking drug design in the artificial intelligence era.

Authors:  Petra Schneider; W Patrick Walters; Alleyn T Plowright; Norman Sieroka; Jennifer Listgarten; Robert A Goodnow; Jasmin Fisher; Johanna M Jansen; José S Duca; Thomas S Rush; Matthias Zentgraf; John Edward Hill; Elizabeth Krutoholow; Matthias Kohler; Jeff Blaney; Kimito Funatsu; Chris Luebkemann; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 84.694

9.  What Makes a Kinase Promiscuous for Inhibitors?

Authors:  Sonya M Hanson; George Georghiou; Manish K Thakur; W Todd Miller; Joshua S Rest; John D Chodera; Markus A Seeliger
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 8.116

10.  DNA-Encoded Library-Derived DDR1 Inhibitor Prevents Fibrosis and Renal Function Loss in a Genetic Mouse Model of Alport Syndrome.

Authors:  Hans Richter; Alexander L Satz; Marc Bedoucha; Bernd Buettelmann; Ann C Petersen; Anja Harmeier; Ricardo Hermosilla; Remo Hochstrasser; Dominique Burger; Bernard Gsell; Rodolfo Gasser; Sylwia Huber; Melanie N Hug; Buelent Kocer; Bernd Kuhn; Martin Ritter; Markus G Rudolph; Franziska Weibel; Judith Molina-David; Jin-Ju Kim; Javier Varona Santos; Martine Stihle; Guy J Georges; R Daniel Bonfil; Rafael Fridman; Sabine Uhles; Solange Moll; Christian Faul; Alessia Fornoni; Marco Prunotto
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 5.100

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.