Literature DB >> 33603916

Management of an Intrauterine Device Migration Resulting in a Pregnancy - Clinical Case.

Mona Akad1, Didier Tardif1, Akad Fawzy2, Razvan V Socolov2.   

Abstract

Intrauterine devices (IUD) are one of the most commonly used methods of contraception worldwide. The long term effect makes it desirable by most patients. The insertion of an IUD is not difficult as a technique but it involves multiple complications such as uterine perforation and migration into the abdominal cavity, urinary bladder perforation, fistula formation, bowel perforation and intra-abdominal adhesions. We present the case of a 31-year-old female patient (para=4) with a medical history of an IUD insertion during her postpartum period in February 2018. In April 2019, during her normal follow up consultation, the speculum examination did not detect any IUD strings and the abdominopelvic ultrasound showed no signs of the device inside the uterine cavity. A subsequent X-ray identified the device in a horizontal position in the pelvic region. The patient was scheduled for surgical intervention, but in the meantime she became pregnant. Decision to continue with the pregnancy was taken and surgery was delayed until the postpartum period. In August 2020, a laparoscopic surgical procedure was performed; during the intervention, the IUD was identified in the anterior rectal wall with only the strings exiting the wall. Therefore, a visceral surgeon advice was required. The device was removed by continuing the laparoscopic intervention. The patient was given antibiotic treatment and had a favorable evolution. Although IUD is thought to be an easy and accessible method of contraception, complications such as uterine perforation must always be taken in consideration and well explained to all patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33603916      PMCID: PMC7879363          DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2020.15.4.549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)        ISSN: 1841-9038


  12 in total

1.  Laparoscopic removal of an intraperitoneal translocated intrauterine contraceptive device.

Authors:  L Miranda; A Settembre; P Capasso; D Cuccurullo; D Pisaniello; F Corcione
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.848

2.  Colon penetration by a copper intrauterine device: a case report with literature review.

Authors:  Anil Arslan; Mine Kanat-Pektas; Huseyin Yesilyurt; Umit Bilge
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Endoscopic treatment of a transmigrated intrauterine device to colonic wall: a case report.

Authors:  Murat Gonenc; Mustafa U Kalayci; Ahmet N Turhan; Cemal Deniztas; Halil Alis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Women's willingness and ability to feel the strings of their intrauterine device.

Authors:  Juliana Melo; Mary Tschann; Reni Soon; Melissa Kuwahara; Bliss Kaneshiro
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  Pelvic mass due to transmigrated IUD.

Authors:  Nadereh Behtash; Setareh Akhavan; Sara Mokhtar
Journal:  Acta Med Iran       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr

Review 6.  Migration of intrauterine devices: radiologic findings and implications for patient care.

Authors:  Hillary E Boortz; Daniel J A Margolis; Nagesh Ragavendra; Maitraya K Patel; Barbara M Kadell
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Removal of intra-abdominal mislocated intrauterine devices by laparoscopy.

Authors:  O Balci; M Capar; A S Mahmoud; M C Colakoglu
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device to the sigmoid colon: a case report.

Authors:  U S Nceboz; H T Ozçakir; Y Uyar; H Cağlar
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Intrauterine device embedded into the bladder wall with stone formation: laparoscopic removal is a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery.

Authors:  Dong Gil Shin; Tae Nam Kim; Wan Lee
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Sigmoid colocolic fistula caused by intrauterine device migration: a case report.

Authors:  Amila Weerasekera; Pravin Wijesinghe; Nilhan Nugaduwa
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2014-03-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Ectopic Intrauterine Device Revealed by Ureteral Colic in a 37-Week Pregnant Woman: Case Report.

Authors:  Alexandra Matei; Mihai Cornel Traian Dimitriu; Irina Pacu; Crîngu Ionescu
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.