Literature DB >> 33603894

Thrombotic risk in antiphospholipidic syndrome: From hypothesis to current evidence (Review).

Claudia Mihaela Gavriș1, Laurențiu Dănuț Nedelcu1, Alina Mihaela Pascu1.   

Abstract

Thirty-five years after it was first described, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is unanimously recognized as a systemic autoimmune disease, a major acquired thrombophilia, which can affect any arterial or venous vascular territory, explaining the great diversity of clinical manifestations. The current classification criteria updated in the International Consensus Statement for Definite Antiphospholipid Syndrome from Sydney cannot explain alone the unpredictable evolution with thrombotic events of the patients diagnosed with APS. Although the link to genetics and epigenetics has not been clearly defined as in other autoimmune diseases, it is clear that a proper stratification of thrombotic risk in the era of personalized medicine must include classic biological markers (antiphospholipid antibodies, aPL), along with the already recognized phenotypes, non-conventional serological markers, and additional genetic risk factors for thrombosis. Moreover, with advancing age, a patient with APS develops other thrombotic risk factors which include: hypertension and dyslipidemia among others. According to the classification criteria, a patient is considered to have a low, moderate or high thrombotic risk. In clinical practice, patients with the same risk score may have completely different evolutions in terms of the recurrence of thrombosis. Concerning this approach, it appears that new non-conventional serological markers, phenotype-assessment and genetic determinants have an increasing importance and should be reconsidered in a proper thrombotic risk evaluation in patients with APS, compared to the initial concept of APS as first defined.
Copyright © 2020, Spandidos Publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anti-β2 glycoprotein-1 antibodies; anticardiolipin antibodies; antiphospholipid antibodies; antiphospholipid syndrome; lupus anticoagulant; risk assessment; thrombosis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33603894      PMCID: PMC7851644          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.9718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  36 in total

Review 1.  Lupus anticoagulants are stronger risk factors for thrombosis than anticardiolipin antibodies in the antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Monica Galli; Davide Luciani; Guido Bertolini; Tiziano Barbui
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-10-03       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

Authors:  S Miyakis; M D Lockshin; T Atsumi; D W Branch; R L Brey; R Cervera; R H W M Derksen; P G DE Groot; T Koike; P L Meroni; G Reber; Y Shoenfeld; A Tincani; P G Vlachoyiannopoulos; S A Krilis
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 3.  IgG/IgM antiphospholipid antibodies present in the classification criteria for the antiphospholipid syndrome: a critical review of their association with thrombosis.

Authors:  H Kelchtermans; L Pelkmans; B de Laat; K M Devreese
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.824

4.  Clinical significance of anti-domain 1 β2-glycoprotein I antibodies in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Teresa Iwaniec; Marcin P Kaczor; Magdalena Celińska-Löwenhoff; Stanisław Polański; Jacek Musiał
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.944

5.  Thrombophilia, risk factors and prevention.

Authors:  Elena Campello; Luca Spiezia; Angelo Adamo; Paolo Simioni
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.929

6.  Clinical course of high-risk patients diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  V Pengo; A Ruffatti; C Legnani; P Gresele; D Barcellona; N Erba; S Testa; F Marongiu; E Bison; G Denas; A Banzato; S Padayattil Jose; S Iliceto
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 7.  The antiphospholipid syndrome: from pathophysiology to treatment.

Authors:  Simone Negrini; Fabrizio Pappalardo; Giuseppe Murdaca; Francesco Indiveri; Francesco Puppo
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 8.  Thrombotic risk assessment in antiphospholipid syndrome: the role of new antibody specificities and thrombin generation assay.

Authors:  Savino Sciascia; Simone Baldovino; Karen Schreiber; Laura Solfietti; Massimo Radin; Maria J Cuadrado; Elisa Menegatti; Doruk Erkan; Dario Roccatello
Journal:  Clin Mol Allergy       Date:  2016-07-15

Review 9.  Seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome: refining the value of "non-criteria" antibodies for diagnosis and clinical management.

Authors:  Pasquale Pignatelli; Evaristo Ettorre; Danilo Menichelli; Arianna Pani; Francesco Violi; Daniele Pastori
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 9.941

10.  Diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  C Gardiner; J Hills; S J Machin; H Cohen
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 2.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.