| Literature DB >> 33603328 |
Marlene D Wang1, Cecile Truong1, Zaid Mammo1, Syed Amal Hussnain1, Royce W S Chen1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biomicroscopy, B-scan ultrasound imaging, and SD-OCT are all modalities used to characterize a posterior vitreous detachment (PVD). Our objective is to assess the precision of the diagnosis of PVD by SS-OCT.Entities:
Keywords: optical coherence tomography; posterior vitreous detachment; swept source
Year: 2021 PMID: 33603328 PMCID: PMC7886381 DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S297307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Ophthalmol ISSN: 1177-5467
Rate of PVD Diagnosis. SS-OCT Diagnosed a Complete PVD at a Significantly Higher Rate Than Ultrasound or Biomicroscopy
| Ultrasound | Biomicroscopy | SS-OCT |
|---|---|---|
| 45.30% | 41.10% | 55.80% |
| 43/95 eyes | 39/95 eyes | 53/95 eyes |
Figure 1(A and B) No complete posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) identified by Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography (SS-OCT). (A) The premacular bursa is visible, and the vitreous remains attached temporally and at the optic nerve head. (B) The vitreous is detached temporally and at the fovea but remains adherent to the optic nerve head.
Cases with Discrepancies Between SS-OCT and Ultrasound
| Ultrasound PVD | Biomicroscopy PVD | SS-OCT PVD | Lens Status | Refractive Error | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No | No | Yes | Pseudophakic | +3.5 |
| 2 | No | No | Yes | Phakic | −1.5 |
| 3 | Yes | No | No | Phakic | +1 |
| 4 | Yes | No | No | Pseudophakic | 0 |
| 5 | Yes | No | No | Phakic | 0 |
| 6 | No | Yes | Yes | Phakic | −6.25 |
| 7 | No | Yes | Yes | Phakic | −6.25 |
| 8 | No | Yes | Yes | Phakic | −10 |
| 9 | No | No | Yes | Phakic | +2.25 |
| 10 | No | No | Yes | Phakic | +3 |
| 11 | No | No | Yes | Phakic | −1.25 |
| 12 | No | No | Yes | Phakic | −1.25 |
| 13 | No | No | Yes | Pseudophakic | +2.75 |
| 14 | No | Yes | Yes | Pseudophakic | +1.5 |
| 15 | No | No | Yes | Phakic | −1.25 |
| 16 | No | No | Yes | Phakic | −3.25 |
Figure 2No PVD was identified by ultrasound, however the SS-OCT revealed a complete detachment of the vitreous from the optic nerve head and the fovea.
Figure 3(A) A PVD was identified by ultrasound, however the SS-OCT revealed adhesions of the vitreous at the fovea and the optic nerve head. The optically empty pockets seen within the vitreous of the SS-OCT image may represent a situation that is not easily identified with ultrasound. (B) SS-OCT revealed a small residual adhesion of the vitreous to the optic nerve head that was not identified by ultrasound.
Figure 4A complete PVD was identified by SS-OCT and ultrasound, but not by biomicroscopy.