Literature DB >> 33603137

Pharmacokinetic neuroimaging to study the dose-related brain kinetics and target engagement of buprenorphine in vivo.

Sylvain Auvity1,2, Sébastien Goutal1,3, Fabien Caillé1,4, Dominique Vodovar1,2, Alain Pruvost5, Catriona Wimberley1,6, Claire Leroy1,4, Matteo Tonietto1,4, Michel Bottlaender1,4, Nicolas Tournier7,8.   

Abstract

A wide range of buprenorphine doses are used for either pain management or maintenance therapy in opioid addiction. The complex in vitro profile of buprenorphine, with affinity for µ-, δ-, and κ-opioid receptors (OR), makes it difficult to predict its dose-related neuropharmacology in vivo. In rats, microPET imaging and pretreatment by OR antagonists were performed to assess the binding of radiolabeled buprenorphine (microdose 11C-buprenorphine) to OR subtypes in vivo (n = 4 per condition). The µ-selective antagonist naloxonazine (10 mg/kg) and the non-selective OR antagonist naloxone (1 mg/kg) blocked the binding of 11C-buprenorphine, while pretreatment by the δ-selective (naltrindole, 3 mg/kg) or the κ-selective antagonist (norbinaltorphimine, 10 mg/kg) did not. In four macaques, PET imaging and kinetic modeling enabled description of the regional brain kinetics of 11C-buprenorphine, co-injected with increasing doses of unlabeled buprenorphine. No saturation of the brain penetration of buprenorphine was observed for doses up to 0.11 mg/kg. Regional differences in buprenorphine-associated receptor occupancy were observed. Analgesic doses of buprenorphine (0.003 and 0.006 mg/kg), respectively, occupied 20% and 49% of receptors in the thalamus while saturating the low but significant binding observed in cerebellum and occipital cortex. Occupancy >90% was achieved in most brain regions with plasma concentrations >7 µg/L. PET data obtained after co-injection of an analgesic dose of buprenorphine (0.003 mg/kg) predicted the binding potential of microdose 11C-buprenorphine. This strategy could be further combined with pharmacodynamic exploration or pharmacological MRI to investigate the neuropharmacokinetics and neuroreceptor correlate, at least at µ-OR, of the acute effects of buprenorphine in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33603137      PMCID: PMC8115308          DOI: 10.1038/s41386-021-00976-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  41 in total

1.  Buprenorphine is a weak partial agonist that inhibits opioid receptor desensitization.

Authors:  Michael S Virk; Seksiri Arttamangkul; William T Birdsong; John T Williams
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Opioid pharmacology.

Authors:  Andrea M Trescot; Sukdeb Datta; Marion Lee; Hans Hansen
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Primary Care and the Opioid-Overdose Crisis - Buprenorphine Myths and Realities.

Authors:  Sarah E Wakeman; Michael L Barnett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The clinical analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine.

Authors:  R B Raffa; M Haidery; H-M Huang; K Kalladeen; D E Lockstein; H Ono; M J Shope; O A Sowunmi; J K Tran; J V Pergolizzi
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Structural determinants of opioid and NOP receptor activity in derivatives of buprenorphine.

Authors:  Gerta Cami-Kobeci; Willma E Polgar; Taline V Khroyan; Lawrence Toll; Stephen M Husbands
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Clinical actions of fentanyl and buprenorphine. The significance of receptor binding.

Authors:  R A Boas; J W Villiger
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Buprenorphine: a unique drug with complex pharmacology.

Authors:  Kabirullah Lutfy; Alan Cowan
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.363

Review 8.  Opioid antagonists, partial agonists, and agonists/antagonists: the role of office-based detoxification.

Authors:  Standiford Helm; Andrea M Trescot; James Colson; Nalini Sehgal; Sanford Silverman
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 9.  Pain and u-shaped dose responses: occurrence, mechanisms, and clinical implications.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.635

10.  Comprehensive molecular pharmacology screening reveals potential new receptor interactions for clinically relevant opioids.

Authors:  Keith M Olson; David I Duron; Daniel Womer; Ryan Fell; John M Streicher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.