Literature DB >> 33602431

Access-Site Crossover in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Invasive Management.

Felice Gragnano1, Mattia Branca2, Enrico Frigoli2, Sergio Leonardi3, Pascal Vranckx4, Dario Di Maio5, Emanuele Monda5, Luigi Fimiani6, Vincenzo Fioretti7, Salvatore Chianese7, Fabrizio Esposito7, Michele Franzese7, Martina Scalise7, Claudio D'Angelo6, Renato Scalise6, Gabriele De Blasi6, Giuseppe Andò6, Giovanni Esposito7, Paolo Calabrò5, Stephan Windecker8, Giovanni Pedrazzini9, Marco Valgimigli10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of access-site crossover in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive management via radial or femoral access.
BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the clinical implications of access-site crossover.
METHODS: In the MATRIX (Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of Angiox)-Access trial, 8,404 patients with acute coronary syndrome were randomized to radial or femoral access. Patients undergoing access-site crossover or successful access site were investigated. Thirty-day coprimary outcomes were a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE]) and a composite of MACE or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding (net adverse clinical events [NACE]).
RESULTS: Access-site crossover occurred in 183 of 4,197 patients (4.4%) in the radial group (mainly to femoral access) and 108 of 4,207 patients (2.6%) in the femoral group (mainly to radial access). In multivariate analysis, the risk for coprimary outcomes was not significantly higher with radial crossover compared with successful radial (MACE: adjusted rate ratio [adjRR]: 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81 to 1.93; p = 0.32; NACE: adjRR: 1.40; 95% CI: 0.94 to 2.06; p = 0.094) or successful femoral access (MACE: adjRR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.81; p = 0.47; NACE: adjRR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.86; p = 0.24). Access site-related Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding was higher with radial crossover than successful radial access. Femoral crossover remained associated with higher risks for MACE (adjRR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.18 to 2.87; p = 0.007) and NACE (adjRR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.09 to 2.62; p = 0.019) compared with successful femoral access. Results remained consistent after excluding patients with randomized access not attempted.
CONCLUSIONS: Crossover from radial to femoral access abolishes the bleeding benefit offered by the radial over femoral artery but does not appear to increase the risk for MACE or NACE compared with successful radial or femoral access. (Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of Angiox [MATRIX]; NCT01433627).
Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute coronary syndrome; crossover; femoral access; percutaneous coronary intervention; radial access

Year:  2021        PMID: 33602431     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.11.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  8 in total

1.  Switching From Proximal to Distal Radial Artery Access for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Recanalization.

Authors:  Alexandru Achim; Tímea Szigethy; Dorottya Olajos; Levente Molnár; Roland Papp; György Bárczi; Kornél Kákonyi; István F Édes; Dávid Becker; Béla Merkely; Jef Van den Eynde; Zoltán Ruzsa
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-09

2.  Risk factors for revascularization and in-stent restenosis in patients with triple-vessel disease after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  MengYing Zeng; XiaoWei Yan; Wei Wu
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Association between the triglyceride glucose index and coronary collateralization in coronary artery disease patients with chronic total occlusion lesions.

Authors:  Ang Gao; Jinxing Liu; Chengping Hu; Yan Liu; Yong Zhu; Hongya Han; Yujie Zhou; Yingxin Zhao
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Impact of anemia on in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Huilin Hu; Shijun Wang; Guanmin Tang; Changlin Zhai; Liang Shen
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 5.  First Experience Using the Sheathless Hyperion Guiding Catheter System Designed for Direct Insertion.

Authors:  Andrew Borrie; Sarah Fairley; Scott A Harding
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Safety and efficacy of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via distal transradial artery access in the anatomical snuffbox: a single-centre prospective cohort study using a propensity score method.

Authors:  Feng Li; Xiao-Long Yu; Gan-Wei Shi; Rui-Xiao Song; Jian-Qiang Xiao; Hao-Min Huang; La-Mei Li; Liu-Yan Zhang; Chun Gong; Gao-Jun Cai
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 7.  Advancement in Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the Distal Transradial Artery Access in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Complex Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Gang Cao; Hua-Xiu Cai; Jun Cao
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  A prediction model based on platelet parameters, lipid levels, and angiographic characteristics to predict in-stent restenosis in coronary artery disease patients implanted with drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Min-Tao Gai; Bing Zhu; Xiao-Cui Chen; Fen Liu; Xiang Xie; Xiao-Ming Gao; Xiang Ma; Zhen-Yan Fu; Yi-Tong Ma; Bang-Dang Chen
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.876

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.