C L Downey1, J Bentley2, H Pandit3. 1. Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, St. James's University Hospital, University of Leeds, Level 7, Clinical Sciences Building, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK. c.l.downey@leeds.ac.uk. 2. School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. 3. Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Time out of clinical training can impact medical trainees' skills, competence and confidence. Periods of Out of Programme for Research (OOPR) are often much longer than other approved mechanisms for time of out training. The aim of this survey study was to explore the challenges of returning to clinical training following OOPR, and determine potential solutions. METHODS: All current integrated academic training (IAT) doctors at the University of Leeds (United Kingdom) and previous IAT trainees undertaking OOPR in the local region (West Yorkshire, United Kingdom)(n = 53) were invited to complete a multidisciplinary survey. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 33 participants (62% response rate). The most relevant challenges identified were completing the thesis whilst transitioning back to clinical work, the rapid transition between full-time research and clinical practice, a diminished confidence in clinical abilities and isolation from colleagues. Potential solutions included dedicated funds allocated for the renewal of lapsed skills, adequate notice of the clinical rotation to which trainees return, informing clinical supervisors about the OOPR trainee returning to practice and a mandatory return to standard clinical days. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing these issues has the potential to improve the trainee experience and encourage future trainees to take time out of training for research activities.
BACKGROUND: Time out of clinical training can impact medical trainees' skills, competence and confidence. Periods of Out of Programme for Research (OOPR) are often much longer than other approved mechanisms for time of out training. The aim of this survey study was to explore the challenges of returning to clinical training following OOPR, and determine potential solutions. METHODS: All current integrated academic training (IAT) doctors at the University of Leeds (United Kingdom) and previous IAT trainees undertaking OOPR in the local region (West Yorkshire, United Kingdom)(n = 53) were invited to complete a multidisciplinary survey. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 33 participants (62% response rate). The most relevant challenges identified were completing the thesis whilst transitioning back to clinical work, the rapid transition between full-time research and clinical practice, a diminished confidence in clinical abilities and isolation from colleagues. Potential solutions included dedicated funds allocated for the renewal of lapsed skills, adequate notice of the clinical rotation to which trainees return, informing clinical supervisors about the OOPR trainee returning to practice and a mandatory return to standard clinical days. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing these issues has the potential to improve the trainee experience and encourage future trainees to take time out of training for research activities.
Entities:
Keywords:
Academic; Return to training; Support; Training
Authors: Jyothis T George; David A Warriner; Jeffrin Anthony; Kavitha S Rozario; Sinu Xavier; Edward B Jude; Gerard A McKay Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2008-04-17 Impact factor: 2.463