Literature DB >> 33601881

Quantitative Protection Factors for Common Masks and Face Coverings.

David Leith1,2, Christian L'Orange1, John Volckens1.   

Abstract

The performance of masks, whether intended to protect the community from exhaled infectious aerosol or to protect the wearer from inhaled infectious aerosol, depends on factors such as filtration efficiency, particle size distribution, leakage, and ventilation rate. These factors depend on the activities and facial features of the mask wearer so that the mask performance for real-world applications is difficult to predict. The present work shows how protection factor, a quantity often used to describe mask performance, can be estimated without involving human volunteers. By constraining these factors to known values, mask protection factors can be compared fairly and efficiently following a series of filtration efficiency measurements performed in the laboratory. Protection factors and mask emissions for exhalation and inhalation were evaluated for masks of seven types currently in use around the world and for a hypothetical mask with 99% efficiency on all particles. The performance of reusable masks made from cotton fabric was limited by the size of the native cotton fibers. Masks that utilized finer fibers, particularly electret fibers with relatively small diameters, showed excellent performance with moderate flow resistance. Results from this work, in addition to simple guidance for mask fit and usage, can facilitate risk communication and decision-making efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33601881     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c07291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  A comparison of performance metrics for cloth masks as source control devices for simulated cough and exhalation aerosols.

Authors:  William G Lindsley; Francoise M Blachere; Donald H Beezhold; Brandon F Law; Raymond C Derk; Justin M Hettick; Karen Woodfork; William T Goldsmith; James R Harris; Matthew G Duling; Brenda Boutin; Timothy Nurkiewicz; Theresa Boots; Jayme Coyle; John D Noti
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.809

2.  Aerosol emissions from wind instruments: effects of performer age, sex, sound pressure level, and bell covers.

Authors:  John Volckens; Kristen M Good; Dan Goble; Nicholas Good; Joshua P Keller; Amy Keisling; Christian L'Orange; Emily Morton; Rebecca Phillips; Ky Tanner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Safety and Reverence: How Roman Catholic Liturgy Can Respond to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Sergey Budaev
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2021-05-24

4.  The advantage of self-protecting interventions in mitigating epidemic circulation at the community level.

Authors:  Romualdo Pastor-Satorras; Claudio Castellano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Impulse dispersion of aerosols during playing the recorder and evaluation of safety measures.

Authors:  Marie Köberlein; Laila Hermann; Sophia Gantner; Bogac Tur; Gregor Peters; Caroline Westphalen; Tobias Benthaus; Michael Döllinger; Stefan Kniesburges; Matthias Echternach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  A Simple Method to Quantify Outward Leakage of Medical Face Masks and Barrier Face Coverings: Implication for the Overall Filtration Efficiency.

Authors:  Silvia Chiera; Alessandro Cristoforetti; Luca Benedetti; Giandomenico Nollo; Luca Borro; Lorenzo Mazzei; Francesco Tessarolo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.