Xue-Yan Zheng1, Pablo Orellano2, Hua-Liang Lin3, Mei Jiang4, Wei-Jie Guan5. 1. Institute of Non-communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangdong, China. 2. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia San Nicolás, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional (CONICET), San Nicolás, Argentina. 3. Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. 4. State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. 5. State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: battery203@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Air pollution is a major environmental hazard to human health and a leading cause of morbidity for asthma worldwide. OBJECTIVES: To assess the current evidence on short-term effects (from several hours to 7 days) of exposure to ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and sulphur dioxide (SO2) on asthma exacerbations, defined as emergency room visits (ERVs) and hospital admissions (HAs). METHODS: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and other electronic databases to retrieve studies that investigated the risk of asthma-related ERVs and HAs associated with short-term exposure to O3, NO2, or SO2. We evaluated the risks of bias (RoB) for individual studies and the certainty of evidence for each pollutant in the overall analysis. A subgroup analysis was performed, stratified by sex, age, and type of asthma exacerbation. We conducted sensitivity analysis by excluding the studies with high RoB and based on the E-value. Publication bias was examined with the Egger's test and with funnel plots. RESULTS: Our literature search retrieved 9,059 articles, and finally 67 studies were included, from which 48 studies included the data on children, 21 on adults, 14 on the elderly, and 31 on the general population. Forty-three studies included data on asthma ERVs, and 25 on asthma HAs. The pooled relative risk (RR) per 10 µg/m3 increase of ambient concentrations was 1.008 (95%CI: 1.005, 1.011) for maximum 8-hour daily or average 24-hour O3, 1.014 (95%CI: 1.008, 1.020) for average 24-hour NO2, 1.010 (95%CI: 1.001, 1.020) for 24-hour SO2, 1.017 (95%CI: 0.973, 1.063) for maximum 1-hour daily O3, 0.999 (95%CI: 0.966, 1.033) for 1-hour NO2, and 1.003 (95%CI: 0.992, 1.014) for 1-hour SO2. Heterogeneity was observed in all pollutants except for 8-hour or 24-hour O3 and 24-hour NO2. In general, we found no significant differences between subgroups that can explain this heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis based on the RoB showed certain differences in NO2 and SO2 when considering the outcome or confounding domains, but the analysis using the E-value showed that no unmeasured confounders were expected. There was no major evidence of publication bias. Based on the adaptation of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, the certainty of evidence was high for 8-hour or 24-hour O3 and 24-hour NO2, moderate for 24-hour SO2, 1-hour O3, and 1-hour SO2, and low for 1-hour NO2. CONCLUSION: Short-term exposure to daily O3, NO2, and SO2 was associated with an increased risk of asthma exacerbation in terms of asthma-associated ERVs and HAs.
BACKGROUND: Air pollution is a major environmental hazard to human health and a leading cause of morbidity for asthma worldwide. OBJECTIVES: To assess the current evidence on short-term effects (from several hours to 7 days) of exposure to ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and sulphur dioxide (SO2) on asthma exacerbations, defined as emergency room visits (ERVs) and hospital admissions (HAs). METHODS: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and other electronic databases to retrieve studies that investigated the risk of asthma-related ERVs and HAs associated with short-term exposure to O3, NO2, or SO2. We evaluated the risks of bias (RoB) for individual studies and the certainty of evidence for each pollutant in the overall analysis. A subgroup analysis was performed, stratified by sex, age, and type of asthma exacerbation. We conducted sensitivity analysis by excluding the studies with high RoB and based on the E-value. Publication bias was examined with the Egger's test and with funnel plots. RESULTS: Our literature search retrieved 9,059 articles, and finally 67 studies were included, from which 48 studies included the data on children, 21 on adults, 14 on the elderly, and 31 on the general population. Forty-three studies included data on asthma ERVs, and 25 on asthma HAs. The pooled relative risk (RR) per 10 µg/m3 increase of ambient concentrations was 1.008 (95%CI: 1.005, 1.011) for maximum 8-hour daily or average 24-hour O3, 1.014 (95%CI: 1.008, 1.020) for average 24-hour NO2, 1.010 (95%CI: 1.001, 1.020) for 24-hour SO2, 1.017 (95%CI: 0.973, 1.063) for maximum 1-hour daily O3, 0.999 (95%CI: 0.966, 1.033) for 1-hour NO2, and 1.003 (95%CI: 0.992, 1.014) for 1-hour SO2. Heterogeneity was observed in all pollutants except for 8-hour or 24-hour O3 and 24-hour NO2. In general, we found no significant differences between subgroups that can explain this heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis based on the RoB showed certain differences in NO2 and SO2 when considering the outcome or confounding domains, but the analysis using the E-value showed that no unmeasured confounders were expected. There was no major evidence of publication bias. Based on the adaptation of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, the certainty of evidence was high for 8-hour or 24-hour O3 and 24-hour NO2, moderate for 24-hour SO2, 1-hour O3, and 1-hour SO2, and low for 1-hour NO2. CONCLUSION: Short-term exposure to daily O3, NO2, and SO2 was associated with an increased risk of asthma exacerbation in terms of asthma-associated ERVs and HAs.
Authors: Barbara Hoffmann; Hanna Boogaard; Audrey de Nazelle; Zorana J Andersen; Michael Abramson; Michael Brauer; Bert Brunekreef; Francesco Forastiere; Wei Huang; Haidong Kan; Joel D Kaufman; Klea Katsouyanni; Michal Krzyzanowski; Nino Kuenzli; Francine Laden; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Adetoun Mustapha; Pippa Powell; Mary Rice; Aina Roca-Barceló; Charlotte J Roscoe; Agnes Soares; Kurt Straif; George Thurston Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2021-09-23 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Haitong Zhe Sun; Pei Yu; Changxin Lan; Michelle W L Wan; Sebastian Hickman; Jayaprakash Murulitharan; Huizhong Shen; Le Yuan; Yuming Guo; Alexander T Archibald Journal: Innovation (Camb) Date: 2022-04-20
Authors: Ziyi Liu; Fuxu Gong; Lei Tian; Jun Yan; Kang Li; Yizhe Tan; Jie Han; Yue Zhao; Da Li; Zhuge Xi; Xiaohua Liu Journal: Sports Med Health Sci Date: 2022-06-22
Authors: Changqing Lin; Yushan Song; Peter K K Louie; Zibing Yuan; Ying Li; Minghui Tao; Chengcai Li; Jimmy C H Fung; Zhi Ning; Alexis K H Lau; Xiang Qian Lao Journal: Atmos Pollut Res Date: 2022-09-06 Impact factor: 4.831
Authors: Zhiqiang Zong; Mengyue Zhang; Kexin Xu; Yunquan Zhang; Chengyang Hu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-06 Impact factor: 4.614