Literature DB >> 33600834

Endovascular Stapler Complications During Minimally Invasive Nephrectomy: An Updated Review of the FDA MAUDE Database From 2009-2019.

Nikhil Gopal1, Bronwyn Long2, John Phillips3, Majid Eshghi3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the rates of endovascular stapler complications during hilar ligation in minimally invasive radical nephrectomy over the last 10 years.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database from January 1, 2009 to August 1, 2019. Staplers were categorized according to type, namely Ethicon Inc. endocutters (Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick NJ); Endo-GIA (Medtronic, Minneapolis MN); and Endo-TA (Medtronic, Minneapolis MN).
RESULTS: There were 383 cases of complications involving staplers, 63% with Ethicon endocutters; 28% with GIA; and 9% with TA. 22 deaths (5.7% of total complications) were attributed to staplers. No deaths or reoperations occurred due to TA staplers. TA staplers were also associated with a reduced incidence of conversion to open as compared to Ethicon and GIA staplers. Apart from one device, manufacturer evaluation of returned devices either showed no abnormalities or attributed fault to improper use of staplers. DISCUSSION: We characterized stapler complications during a 10-year period for minimally invasive radical nephrectomy. No deaths or reoperations occurred due to TA staplers, perhaps due to cutting and stapling occurring in separate steps. Based on manufacturer evaluation attributing stapling malfunctions to human errors, training of operating room staff on proper use of these devices is critical to prevent potentially significant complications from occurring.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33600834     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

1.  Stapler Malfunctions in Bariatric Surgery: An Analysis of the MAUDE Database.

Authors:  Benjamin Clapp; Alexander Schrodt; Maria Ahmad; Ellen Wicker; Nishtha Sharma; Andres Vivar; Brian Davis
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.789

2.  Retrospective Comparison of Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Non-Donor Patients Undergoing Radical Nephrectomy Using One of Two Different Linear Stapler Technologies for Transection of the Renal Vessels: Fixed-Height Gripping Surface Reloads vs Variable-Height Reloads.

Authors:  Stephen S Johnston; Barbara H Johnson; Divya Chakke; Sanjoy Roy; Philippe Grange; Esther Pollack
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-09-02

3.  Solo-surgeon pure laparoscopic donor nephrectomy using passive camera holder: IDEAL stage 2a study.

Authors:  Dong Hyeon An; Jae Hyeon Han; Myoung Jin Jang; Joomin Aum; Yu Seon Kim; In Gab Jeong; Bumsik Hong; Dalsan You
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 2.264

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.