Literature DB >> 3360047

Dose-finding studies in clinical drug development.

R Schmidt1.   

Abstract

A correct dose-finding study is of the utmost importance during clinical development of a new drug. It must define the no-effect dose and the mean effective and maximal effective doses. Then taking tolerability into account, the optimal therapeutic dose range can be selected. To define the dosage schedule the duration of action in man must be tested, if possible together with blood concentration measurements. An adequate dose-finding study shows the optimal doses for double-blind trials in Phase II and large scale trials in Phase III, thereby saving time and effort and reducing the number of patients required. The tendency of clinical experts to try to demonstrate superiority of one drug over another by using doses higher than patients really need must be resisted. The price paid in poor tolerability exceeds any potential benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3360047     DOI: 10.1007/bf01061410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  3 in total

Review 1.  Proposals for ethical standards in therapeutic trials with humans.

Authors:  P Arpaillange; S Dion; G Mathé
Journal:  Drugs Exp Clin Res       Date:  1986

2.  [Toward a better determination of the optimal posology of drugs].

Authors:  P Simon; J F Thiercelin
Journal:  Therapie       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.070

Review 3.  A guide to the pharmacology of placebos.

Authors:  C W Gowdey
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1983-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

  3 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  [Dose-response relation: relevance for clinical practice].

Authors:  U Klinkhardt; S Harder
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-12-15

2.  An Algorithm and R Program for Fitting and Simulation of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data.

Authors:  Jijie Li; Kewei Yan; Lisha Hou; Xudong Du; Ping Zhu; Li Zheng; Cairong Zhu
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.441

3.  Lisinopril dose-response relationship in essential hypertension.

Authors:  H J Gomez; V J Cirillo; J A Sromovsky; E S Otterbein; W C Shaw; J E Rush; S G Chrysant; A H Gradman; A S Leon; E P MacCarthy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Lessons Learned from Phase II and Phase III Trials Investigating Therapeutic Agents for Cerebral Ischemia Associated with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi; Iryna Lobanova; Wei Huang; Muhammad F Ishfaq; Joseph P Broderick; Christy N Cassarly; Renee H Martin; R Loch Macdonald; Jose I Suarez
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 5.  Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation.

Authors:  Ji-Han Huang; Qian-Min Su; Juan Yang; Ying-Hua Lv; Ying-Chun He; Jun-Chao Chen; Ling Xu; Kun Wang; Qing-Shan Zheng
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 4.162

6.  Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A randomized pilot trial of pharmaconutrition.

Authors:  Geisi Saito; Rodrigo Zapata; Rodrigo Rivera; Héctor Zambrano; David Rojas; Hernán Acevedo; Franco Ravera; John Mosquera; Juan E Vásquez; Jorge Mura
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-12-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.