Literature DB >> 33600412

The impact of different weed management strategies on weed flora of wheat-based cropping systems.

Muhammad Shahzad1,2, Khawar Jabran3, Mubshar Hussain1, Muhammad Aown Sammar Raza2, Leonard Wijaya4, Mohamed A El-Sheikh4, Mohammed Nasser Alyemeni4.   

Abstract

The world population will rise in future, which would demand more wheat production to fulfil dietary needs of wheat-dependent population of the world. Food security in wheat-dependent regions will greatly rely on wheat productivity. Weed infestation is a major constraint reducing wheat productivity globally. Nonetheless, cropping systems and weed management strategies strongly influence weed infestation in modern agriculture. Herbicides are the key weed management tool in conventional agriculture. However, frequent use of herbicides have resulted in the evolution of herbicide-resistance weeds, which made weed management a challenging task. Sustainable and eco-friendly weed management strategies shift weed-crop competition in the favour of crop plants. Limited studies have evaluated the interactive effect of cropping systems and weed management strategies on weed flora of wheat-based cropping systems (WBCSs). This two-year study evaluated the impact of different weed management strategies (WMSs) on weed flora of WBCSs, i.e., fallow-wheat (FW), rice-wheat (RW), cotton-wheat (CW), mungbean-wheat (MW) and sorghum-wheat (SW). The WMSs included in the study were, false seedbed, allelopathic water extracts and herbicide application, while weed-free and weedy-check were maintained as control treatments. Data relating to diversity and density of individual and total broadleaved and narrow-leaved weeds were recorded. The WBCSs, WMSs and their interaction significantly altered diversity and density of individual, total, broadleaved and narrow-leaved weeds. Weed-free and weedy-check treatments recorded the lowest and the highest values of diversity and density of individual, total, broadleaved and narrow-leaved weeds. Herbicide application effectively reduced density and diversity of weeds. Allelopathic water extracts and false seedbed proved less effective than herbicides. On the other hand, SW cropping system not only reduced weed density but also limited the weed flora. It is concluded that false seedbed and SW cropping system can be efficiently used to manage weeds in WBCSs. However, long-term studies are needed to infer the impact of SW cropping system and false seedbed on soil properties, soil microbes and productivity of wheat crop.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33600412      PMCID: PMC7891686          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  11 in total

1.  Allelopathic potential of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) : Isolation of seed germination inhibitors.

Authors:  F R Lehle; A R Putnam
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Evolution in action: plants resistant to herbicides.

Authors:  Stephen B Powles; Qin Yu
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 26.379

Review 3.  The role of allelopathy in agricultural pest management.

Authors:  Muhammad Farooq; Khawar Jabran; Zahid A Cheema; Abdul Wahid; Kadambot H M Siddique
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 4.845

Review 4.  Herbicides as weed control agents: state of the art: I. Weed control research and safener technology: the path to modern agriculture.

Authors:  Hansjoerg Kraehmer; Bernd Laber; Chris Rosinger; Arno Schulz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Malthus is still wrong: we can feed a world of 9-10 billion, but only by reducing food demand.

Authors:  Pete Smith
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 6.297

Review 6.  Herbicide resistant weeds: A call to integrate conventional agricultural practices, molecular biology knowledge and new technologies.

Authors:  Valeria E Perotti; Alvaro S Larran; Valeria E Palmieri; Andrea K Martinatto; Hugo R Permingeat
Journal:  Plant Sci       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 4.729

Review 7.  Integrated weed management (IWM): why are farmers reluctant to adopt non-chemical alternatives to herbicides?

Authors:  Stephen Moss
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 4.845

8.  2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)-resistant crops and the potential for evolution of 2,4-D-resistant weeds.

Authors:  John F Egan; Bruce D Maxwell; David A Mortensen; Matthew R Ryan; Richard G Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Osmopriming with CaCl2 improves wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production under water-limited environments.

Authors:  Shahid Farooq; Mubshar Hussain; Khawar Jabran; Waseem Hassan; Muhammad S Rizwan; Tauqeer A Yasir
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 10.  Sorghum allelopathy--from ecosystem to molecule.

Authors:  Leslie A Weston; Ibrahim S Alsaadawi; Scott R Baerson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Impact of Different Weed Management Systems on Weed Flora and Dry Biomass Production of Barley Grown under Various Barley-Based Cropping Systems.

Authors:  Muhammad Naeem; Shahid Farooq; Mubshar Hussain
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.