Literature DB >> 33599896

A Pharmacovigilance Study of Adverse Drug Reactions Reported for Cardiovascular Disease Medications Approved Between 2012 and 2017 in the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.

Niti M Patel1, Britney A Stottlemyer1, Matthew P Gray1, Richard D Boyce1,2, Sandra L Kane-Gill3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Between 2012 and 2017, the FDA approved 29 therapies for a cardiovascular disease (CVD) indication. Due to the limited literature on patient safety outcomes for recently approved CVD medications, this study investigated adverse drug reports (ADRs) reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
METHODS: A disproportionality analysis of spontaneously reported ADR was conducted. Reports in FAERS from Quarter 1, 2012, through Quarter 1, 2019, were compiled, allowing a 2-year buffer following drug approval in 2017. Top 10 reported ADRs and reporting odds ratios (ROR; confidence interval (CI)), a measure of disproportionality, were analyzed and compared to drugs available prior to 2012 as appropriate.
RESULTS: Of 7,952,147 ADR reports, 95,016 (1.19%) consisted of reports for newly approved CVD medications. For oral anticoagulants, apixaban had significantly lower reports for anemia and renal failure compared to dabigatran and rivaroxaban but greater reports for neurological signs/symptoms, and arrhythmias. Evaluating heart failure drugs, sacubitril/valsartan had greater reports for acute kidney injury, coughing, potassium imbalances, and renal impairment but notably, lower for angioedema compared to lisinopril. Assessing familial hypercholesterolemia drugs, alirocumab had greater reports for joint-related-signs/symptoms compared to other agents in this category. A newer pulmonary arterial hypertension treatment, selexipag, had greater reports of reporting for bone/joint-related-signs/symptoms but riociguat had greater reports for hemorrhages and vascular hypotension.
CONCLUSION: Pharmacovigilance studies allow an essential opportunity to evaluate the safety profile of CVD medications in clinical practice. Additional research is needed to evaluate these reported safety concerns for recently approved CVD medications.
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticoagulants; Cardiovascular disease; Cardiovascular drugs; Data mining; Familial hypercholesteremia; Heart failure; Post-marketing product surveillance; Pulmonary arterial hypertension; United States FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33599896     DOI: 10.1007/s10557-021-07157-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther        ISSN: 0920-3206            Impact factor:   3.727


  2 in total

Review 1.  Adverse events associated with the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in clinical practice: beyond bleeding complications.

Authors:  Emanuel Raschi; Matteo Bianchin; Walter Ageno; Roberto De Ponti; Fabrizio De Ponti
Journal:  Pol Arch Med Wewn       Date:  2016-08-25

Review 2.  A Systematic Review of PCSK9 Inhibitors Alirocumab and Evolocumab.

Authors:  Marian McDonagh; Kim Peterson; Brittany Holzhammer; Sergio Fazio
Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm       Date:  2016-06
  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Musculoskeletal Adverse Events Associated with PCSK9 Inhibitors: Disproportionality Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

Authors:  Lingqing Ding; Congqin Chen; Yongkuan Yang; Jie Fang; Longxing Cao; Yige Liu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.023

2.  Pharmacovigilance and Its Importance for Primary Health Care Professionals.

Authors:  Asma A'tiyah Abdul Hamid; Rashidah Rahim; Shyh Poh Teo
Journal:  Korean J Fam Med       Date:  2022-09-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.