Literature DB >> 33599688

Association of Immunophenotype With Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the BrighTNess Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Otto Metzger Filho1, Daniel G Stover2,3, Sarah Asad3, Peter J Ansell4, Mark Watson5, Sibylle Loibl6, Charles E Geyer7,8, Junu Bae2, Katharine Collier2,3, Mathew Cherian2,3,4, Joyce O'Shaughnessy9, Michael Untch10, Hope S Rugo11, Jens B Huober12,13, Mehra Golshan14,15,16, William M Sikov17, Gunter von Minckwitz6, Priya Rastogi18, David Maag4, Norman Wolmark19, Carsten Denkert20, W Fraser Symmans21.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Adding carboplatin to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) likely benefits a subset of patients; however, determinants of benefit are poorly understood.
OBJECTIVE: To define the association of molecular subtype, tumor proliferation, and immunophenotype with benefit of carboplatin added to NAC for patients with stages II to III TNBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of a phase 3, double-blind, randomized clinical trial (BrighTNess) that enrolled 634 women across 145 centers in 15 countries. Women with clinical stages II to III TNBC who had undergone pretreatment biopsy were eligible to participate. Whole transcriptome RNA sequencing was performed on the biopsy specimens. The prespecified end point was association of pathologic complete response (pCR) with gene expression-based molecular subtype, with secondary end points investigating established signatures (proliferation, immune) and exploratory analyses of immunophenotype. Data were collected from April 2014 to March 2016. The study analyses were performed from January 2018 to March 2019.
INTERVENTIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, or this same regimen with carboplatin or carboplatin plus veliparib. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Association of gene expression-based molecular subtype (PAM50 and TNBC subtypes) with pCR.
RESULTS: Of the 634 women (median age, 51 [range, 22-78] years) enrolled in BrighTNess, 482 (76%) patients had evaluable RNA sequencing data, with similar baseline characteristics relative to the overall intention-to-treat population. Pathologic complete response was significantly more frequent in PAM50 basal-like vs nonbasal-like cancers overall (202 of 386 [52.3%] vs 34 of 96 [35.4%]; P = .003). Carboplatin benefit was not significantly different in basal-like vs nonbasal-like subgroups (P = .80 for interaction). In multivariable analysis, proliferation (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.21-0.61; P < .001) and immune (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49-0.79; P < .001) signatures were independently associated with pCR. Tumors above the median for proliferation and immune signatures had the highest pCR rate (84 of 125; 67%), while those below the median for both signatures had the lowest pCR rate (42 of 125; 34%). Exploratory gene expression immune analyses suggested that tumors with higher inferred CD8+ T-cell infiltration may receive greater benefit with addition of carboplatin. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, triple-negative breast cancer subtyping revealed high pCR rates in basal-like and immunomodulatory subsets. Analysis of biological processes related to basal-like and immunomodulatory phenotypes identified tumor cell proliferation and immune scores as independent factors associated with achieving pCR; the benefit of carboplatin on pCR was seen across all molecular subtypes. Further validation of immunophenotype with existing biomarkers may help to escalate or de-escalate therapy for patients with TNBC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02032277.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33599688      PMCID: PMC7893540          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  14 in total

1.  FDA approval standards for anticancer agents - lessons from two recent approvals in breast cancer.

Authors:  Bishal Gyawali; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Activity of novel anti-HER2 agents for breast cancer based on hormone receptors expression.

Authors:  Paolo Tarantino; Giuseppe Curigliano
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Margetuximab: First Approval.

Authors:  Anthony Markham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Challenges and Gaps in Clinical Trial Genomic Data Management.

Authors:  Sarah Asad; Kathryn Kananen; Kurt R Mueller; W Fraser Symmans; Yujia Wen; Charles M Perou; James S Blachly; James Chen; Benjamin G Vincent; Daniel G Stover
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2022-03

5.  Redefining breast cancer subtypes to guide treatment prioritization and maximize response: Predictive biomarkers across 10 cancer therapies.

Authors:  Denise M Wolf; Christina Yau; Julia Wulfkuhle; Lamorna Brown-Swigart; Rosa I Gallagher; Pei Rong Evelyn Lee; Zelos Zhu; Mark J Magbanua; Rosalyn Sayaman; Nicholas O'Grady; Amrita Basu; Amy Delson; Jean Philippe Coppé; Ruixiao Lu; Jerome Braun; Smita M Asare; Laura Sit; Jeffrey B Matthews; Jane Perlmutter; Nola Hylton; Minetta C Liu; Paula Pohlmann; W Fraser Symmans; Hope S Rugo; Claudine Isaacs; Angela M DeMichele; Douglas Yee; Donald A Berry; Lajos Pusztai; Emanuel F Petricoin; Gillian L Hirst; Laura J Esserman; Laura J van 't Veer
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 38.585

Review 6.  Treatment for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Jianyun Yin; Changtai Zhu; Gaofeng Wang; Jianwei Gu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-06-30

7.  Tumor suppressor PLK2 may serve as a biomarker in triple-negative breast cancer for improved response to PLK1 therapeutics.

Authors:  Yang Gao; Elena B Kabotyanski; Jonathan H Shepherd; Elizabeth Villegas; Deanna Acosta; Clark Hamor; Tingting Sun; Celina Montmeyor-Garcia; Xiaping He; Lacey E Dobrolecki; Thomas F Westbrook; Michael T Lewis; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Xiang H-F Zhang; Charles M Perou; Jeffrey M Rosen
Journal:  Cancer Res Commun       Date:  2021-12-27

Review 8.  De-Escalation of Breast Cancer Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Authors:  Umar Wazir; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2021-12-30

Review 9.  Platinum and Taxane Based Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Hao Tian; Dandan Ma; Xuanni Tan; Wenting Yan; Xiujuan Wu; Cheng He; Ling Zhong; Yan Zhang; Bingjie Yu; Yi Zhang; Xiaowei Qi
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Interobserver variability in the assessment of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in triple-negative invasive breast carcinoma influences the association with pathological complete response: the IVITA study.

Authors:  Serdar Altinay; Laurent Arnould; Maschenka Balkenhol; Glenn Broeckx; Octavio Burguès; Cecile Colpaert; Franceska Dedeurwaerdere; Benjamin Dessauvagie; Valérie Duwel; Giuseppe Floris; Stephen Fox; Clara Gerosa; Delfyne Hastir; Shabnam Jaffer; Eline Kurpershoek; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Andoni Laka; Kathleen Lambein; Gaëtan Marie MacGrogan; Caterina Marchiò; Maria-Dolores Martin Martinez; Sharon Nofech-Mozes; Dieter Peeters; Alberto Ravarino; Emily Reisenbichler; Erika Resetkova; Souzan Sanati; Anne-Marie Schelfhout; Vera Schelfhout; Abeer Shaaban; Renata Sinke; Claudia M Stanciu-Pop; Carolien H M van Deurzen; Koen K Van de Vijver; Anne-Sophie Van Rompuy; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Hannah Y Wen; Serena Wong; Mieke R Van Bockstal; Aline François; Caroline Bouzin; Christine Galant
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 7.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.