Eliana Lo Presti1, Alessandro Volonterio1,2, Monica Sani1. 1. National Research Council, Institute of Chemical Sciences and Technologies "Giulio Natta" (SCITEC), via Mario Bianco 9, 20131 Milan, Italy. 2. Department of Chemistry, Materials, and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta", Politecnico di Milano, via Mancinelli 7, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Abstract
We report the first synthesis of the complex amino acid labionin in a fully orthogonally protected and stereopure form. The structure-which incorporates five orthogonal protecting groups and three stereogenic centers-was assembled using two key synthetic steps: (1) a thia-Michael addition for installing the thioether bridge; (2) an electrophilic azidation for creating the central quaternary α-amino acid carbon in a stereochemically pure form. This work is expected to enable the solid phase synthesis of both natural and synthetic analogues labyrinthopeptins.
We report the first synthesis of the complex amino acid labionin in a fully orthogonally protected and stereopure form. The structure-which incorporates five orthogonal protecting groups and three stereogenic centers-was assembled using two key synthetic steps: (1) a thia-Michael addition for installing the thioether bridge; (2) an electrophilic azidation for creating the central quaternary α-amino acid carbon in a stereochemically pure form. This work is expected to enable the solid phase synthesis of both natural and synthetic analogues labyrinthopeptins.
Labyrinthopeptins
constitute
a class of ribosomally synthesized peptides discovered in 2010, that
belong to the family of type III lantibiotics.[1] These lantipeptides incorporate the distinctive post-translationally
modified amino acid labionin (Lab 1; Figure ), which is a triamino triacid
featuring an unusual central quaternary carbon. Structurally, Lab 1 can be described as a derivative of meso-lanthionine (Lan)
(Figure ) where the
(S)-α-carbon is connected to a further amino
acid through a methylene bridge.
Figure 1
Structure of labionin, meso-lanthionine,
and labyrinthopeptin A2.
Structure of labionin, meso-lanthionine,
and labyrinthopeptin A2.Unlike lanthionine-containing
peptides, labyrinthopeptins possess
weak antibacterial activity. On the other hand, they display an antiviral
activity in the low micromolar range especially against hRSV.[2] More interestingly, labyrinthopeptin A2 (LabyA2)
(Figure ) was found
effective in animal pain models, showing excellent antiallodynic activity,
although the actual mechanism of action is still unknown.[1] Since these compounds can be considered as potential
novel drugs for the treatment of neuropathic pain, there is a strong
need to perform structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies
in order to identify key structural features important for their bioactivity.In this context, solid phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) represents
an attractive tool to prepare combinatorial libraries of synthetic
analogues, which cannot be obtained by biosynthetic manipulation.
Nevertheless, a SPPS approach to these lantipeptides is nontrivial
because, involving the direct incorporation of labionin into the growing
peptide chain, it requires the availability of opportunely protected
and stereochemically pure labionin amino acid. Although the literature
reported several reviews about the synthesis of lanthionine,[3] a solution chemical route to labionin is still
missing. As far as we know there is only a preliminary study toward
this goal, published in 2001 by Süssmuth et al.[4]From a synthetic point of view, labionin features
two main challenges:
(1) the presence of three stereogenic centers, one of which is quaternary,
and (2) the chemodifferentiation for the three carboxylic acid and
three amino functional groups, using orthogonal protective groups
compatible with both solution and solid phase techniques.Herein
we report, for the first time, the synthesis of orthogonally
protected Labionin 2 (Figure ) in diastereomerically pure form, which
can be considered an excellent building block for a future SPPS approach
to labionin-contaning peptides. In fact, all selected protecting groups
are orthogonal to each other as well as to the transient Fmoc and
permanent Boc/tBu used in Fmoc SPPS. They can be chemoselectively
removed as follows: (a) palladium-catalyzed transfer of the allyl
unit to a scavenger for Alloc carbamate; (b) Staudinger reaction for
the azido group; (c) fluoride mediated removal for TMSE ester; (d)
reduction with SnCl4 in nearly neutral condition for pNz
ester.[5]
Figure 2
Fully orthogonal protected Labionin 2 and chemoselective
removal conditions of each of five functional groups.
Fully orthogonal protected Labionin 2 and chemoselective
removal conditions of each of five functional groups.Our retrosynthetic analysis suggested that a thia-Michael
addition
followed by an electrophilic azidation could represent a viable entry
to introduce the α,α-carbon stereocenter in a stereoselective
way. The key intermediate α,β-unsaturated lactam 4 could, in turn, be obtained through a α-methylenation
reaction performed on the opportunely protected l-pyroglutamic
acid 5, which already incorporates one of the stereocenters
with the correct stereochemistry (Scheme )
Scheme 1
Retrosynthetic Analysis of Labionin 2
Accordingly, (S)-pyroglutamic acid 6 was converted into 4-methylenic
derivative 4 in 60%
overall yield through five scalable synthetic steps (Scheme ).
Scheme 2
Synthesis of α,β-Unsaturated
Lactam 4
First, the carboxylic acid group and the lactamic nitrogen of 6 were respectively protected as trimethylsilyl ethyl ester[6] and allyloxycarbonyl carbamate.[7] N-protected-pyroglutamate 8 was then submitted
to efficient α-methylenation by means of a two-steps sequence
involving a C-4 enamination followed by a Hoffman’ s elimination.
Enaminone 8 was obtained in high yields according to
the previously reported procedure[8] by reaction
with t-BuOCH(NMe2)2 (Bredereck’s
reagent) at 75 °C in 1,2-dimethoxyethane. Although Young et al.
reported DIBAL as reagent for carrying out the enaminone reduction,
we had to choose a more selective reducing agent in order to avoid
side reactions due to the presence of the allyloxycarbonyl group.
We were delighted to find that by using NaBH(OAc)3 in the
presence of AcOH we were able to obtain in high yields a diastereoisomeric
mixture of amines 9 that, in turn, were efficiently converted
into the desired α-methylene lactam 4 by treatment
with MeI followed by Et3N.[9]We next turned our attention to the synthesis of the second fully
protected chiral building block, the (R)-cysteine
derivative 12. Two additional masking groups had to be
selected for the future chemoselective manipulation: a Fmoc group
for the transient protection of the amino function and a cumyl ester
for the carboxylic moiety. Cumyl ester was chosen because of its mild
removal conditions (2% vol of TFA in DCM) which fulfills the requirement
of orthogonality to the other protecting groups[6] (Scheme ).
Scheme 3
Synthesis of the Orthogonally Protected (R)-Cysteine 12
Accordingly, orthogonally protected (R)-cysteine 12 was obtained in excellent yields, starting from commercially
available bis-Fmoc-l-cystine. The procedure involved esterification
of the carboxylic acid of 10 with cumyl trichloroacetamidate,
synthesized as previously reported in the literature,[9] followed by a selective cleavage of the disulfide bridge
with Bu3P and water (Scheme ). With the building blocks 4 and 12 in hand, we focused our attention on the two key steps
of our strategy: the thioether bridge formation and the installation
of the quaternary stereocenter. Et3N-catalyzed thia-Michael
addition of cysteine 12 to α,β-unsaturated
lactam 4 proved to be an excellent approach to install
the thioether moiety. Indeed the reaction proceeded in high yield,
affording straightforwardly a 3:1 mixture of diastereoisomers, which
were easily separated by flash chromatography (FC) (Scheme ).
Scheme 4
Thioether Bridge
Creation by Base-Catalyzed Thia-Michael Addition
With compounds 13a and 13b in
hand, we
turned our attention on the construction of the α,α-disubstituted
central carbon by mean of an electrophilic azidation.Lactam
enolates derived from N-urethane-protected pyroglutamates
are known to undergo monofunctionalization in the position 4 without
loss of optical purity and in a stereocontrolled manner.[10] On the other hand, double substitutions are
much less common and limited to double alkylations.[11] Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, no examples of
direct azide incorporation into pyroglutamates have been reported
until now.The reaction was performed following the protocol
developed by
Evans et al. for the electrophilic azidation of imide enolates.[12] The mixture of diastereomers 13a,b was treated with 2.2 equiv of LiHMDS (an extra equivalent
of base is needed to scavenge the acidic amide proton) in order to
generate the pyroglutamic Li-enolate, which was reacted with 2,4,6-triisopropylbenzenesulfonyl
azide (trisyl azide). The reaction produced in good yield a 1.8:1
epimeric mixture of α,α-disubstituted pyroglutamates 3a and 3b, that can be easily separated by FC
(Scheme ).
Scheme 5
α,α-Disubstituted
Central Carbon Installation by Direct
Electrophilic Azidation
Assignment of the absolute stereochemistry of the newly quaternary
stereocenter was performed by 1H NMR and 2D-NMR studies,
allowing us to assess the configuration S to the minor epimer (see Supporting Information). This result is in line
with that obtained by Ezquerra et al. in the double alkylation of
N-Boc-pyroglutamate.[10a] It is worth noting
that the quaternary stereocenter in the natural labionin has configuration
(S). However, the possibility to have both diastereoisomers in pure
form is favorable for SARs purposes. With the aim of improving either
the yield or/and the diastereoselection of the process, we studied
in detail the influence of the reaction conditions such as metal coordination,
temperature, solvent, and the stereochemistry of the starting materials.
Unfortunately all attempts failed to reach our goal. Indeed when KHMDS
or HMPA were used to generate a less coordinated enolate, the reaction
did not afford the desired compounds, leading to the degradation of
the starting material, suggesting that the pyroglutamic enolate requires
a coordinating metal in order to be stable and reactive. Performing
the reaction on stereochemically pure 13a and 13b, we did not observe remarkable improvement in terms of S:R ratio and yield. Lastly, similar results were obtained when a lower
dielectric constant solvent as toluene was used.Fully protected
Labionin 2 was then successfully obtained
by a three-step process. Selective ring opening of the lactam 3b was achieved by basic hydrolysis with LiOH in THF/H2O 5:2 at 0 °C, leading to the derivative 15b in high yield. The free carboxylic function of 15b was
subsequently protected as 4-nitrobenzyl ester in dry DMF with 4-nitrobenzyl
bromide and KI in a 74% yield. Final cleavage of cumyl ester with
2% TFA in DCM led to target compound Lab 2 in almost
quantitative yield (Scheme ). The same synthetic pathway was also performed on the 4R
epimer (see Supporting Information).
Scheme 6
Completion of Labionin 2 Synthesis
In summary, we have developed for the first time a synthesis
of
orthogonally protected labionin in stereochemically pure form, overcoming
the challenge of selecting six different protective groups suitable
for SPPS and stable to the reaction conditions of our synthetic plan.Labionin 2 can be considered an excellent building
block for a future solid supported chemical synthesis of both natural
labyrinthopeptins and non-native analogues that cannot be obtained
by biosynthetic manipulation. Moreover this route should allow the
access to all the possible labionin stereoisomers for stereochemistry–activity
relationship studies in order to reveal the importance of the cross-links
(the thioether and the methylenic bridges) stereochemistry to the
biological activity. Future work toward the solid phase synthesis
of labyrinthopeptins as well as attempts to obtain in a stereospecific
fashion the amino acid labionin will be presented in due course.
Experimental Section
General Methods
Commercially available reagents, purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich and Fluorochem, were employed without any further
purification. Anhydrous THF was purchased by Sigma-Aldrich. Thin layer
chromatography was performed on Merk silica gel 60 F254 plates. Flash chromatography was performed on Merk silica gel (60
Å, 230–400 mesh). 1H NMR spectra and 2D-NOESY
spectra were recorded on a Bruker ARX400 (400 MHz) spectrometer. Chemical
shifts are reported in ppm using residual CDCl3 or CD3OD as the internal standard (CDCl3 at 7.27 ppm
and CD3OD at 3.31 ppm, respectively). 13C NMR
spectra were recorded on a Bruker 400ARX (101 MHz) spectrometer. Chemical
shifts are reported in ppm using residual CDCl3 or CD3OD as the internal standard (CDCl3 at 77.0 ppm
and CD3OD at 49.0 respectively). NMR data are reported
as multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet,
m = multiplet), coupling constants in Hz, integration. ESI mass spectra
were performed by a Bruker Esquire 3000+ instrument equipped with
a MS detector composed by a ESI ionization source and a Single Quadrupole
mass selective detector or by an Agilent Technologies 1200 Series
HPLC system equipped with a DAD and a 6120 MS detector composed by
an ESI ionization source and a Single Quadrupole mass selective detector.
Optical rotations were measured on a Propol Digital Polarimeter with
a sodium lamp.
To a suspension of (S)-pyroglutamic
acid (15 g, 0.12 mol, 1 equiv) in toluene (150 mL) were added 2-(trimethysilyl)ethanol
(24.3 mL, 0.17 mol, 1.4 equiv) and p-toluensulfonic
acid monohydrate (2.9 g, 0.015 mol, 0.11 equiv). The mixture was heated
(oil bath) to 130 °C and water was removed by azeotropic distillation
with a Dean–Stark apparatus for 2 h. After removal of the solvent,
the resulting residue was dissolved in EtOAc (100 mL) and washed with
a 10% K2CO3 solution (3 × 50 mL) and brine
(1 × 50 mL). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure
affording 7 (23.2 g, quantitative) as a white solid,
which was used in the next step without any further purification.
Spectral data match with those reported in literature.[7]
To a solution of 7 (2.0 g,
8.7 mmol, 1 equiv) in dry THF (100 mL), cooled to 0 °C and under
a N2 atmosphere, was added portion wise NaH (60% in mineral
oil, 384 mg, 9.6 mmol, 1.1 equiv). After stirring for 30 min, allylchloroformate
(1.11 mL, 10.5 mmol, 1.2 equiv) was added and the reaction was stirred
for additional 2 h at the same temperature. The reaction was quenched
with saturated NH4Cl (50 mL), diluted with EtOAc (70 mL),
and the phases were separated. The organic layer was washed with brine
(1 × 50 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude was
purified by FC (60:40 Hex/EtOAc) to give 5 (2.32 g, 85%)
as a yellow oil. R 0.61
(60:40 Hex:EtOAc); [α]D20 −36.6
(c = 1.00, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400
MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.96–5.83 (m, 1H), 5.34 (dd, J = 17.2 Hz, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 5.21 (dd, J = 10.5 Hz,
1.4 Hz, 1H), 4.70–4.66 (m, 2H), 4.61 (dd, J = 9.4 Hz, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.24–4.18 (m, 2H), 2.65–2.55
(m, 1H), 2.50–2.42 (m, 1H), 2.37–2.25 (m, 1H), 2.08–1.98
(m, 1H), 0.99–0.94 (m, 2H), −0.03 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.9, 171.2,
151.0, 131.3, 119.0, 67.4, 64.4, 58.9, 31.2, 21.9, 17.5, −1.5;
MS-(ESI) m/z 335.9 [M + Na]+, 351.8 [M + K]+. Anal. Calcd for C14H23NO5Si: C 53.65; H 7.40; N 4.47; O 25.52;
Si 8.96. Found: C 53.63; H 7.40; N 4.45; O 25.49; Si 8.95.
To a solution of 5 (2.186 g,
7 mmol, 1 equiv) in dimethoxyethane (6 mL) was added Bredereck’s
reagent (2.16 mL, 10.5 mmol, 1.5 equiv) and the reaction was heated
(oil bath) to 70 °C for 2.5 h. After concentration at reduced
pressure, the crude was purified by FC (100% EtOAc) to give 8 (2.24 g, 87%) as a yellow oil. R 0.50 (EtOAc); [α]D20 −33.6 (c = 1.00, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.07 (bt, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.92–5.81 (m, 1H), 5.33 (dd, J = 17.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 5.15 (dd, J = 10.5,
1.6 Hz, 1H), 4.66–4.62 (m, 2H), 4.51 (dd, J = 10.6 Hz, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 4.19–4.13 (m, 2H), 3.22 (dd, J = 14.5, 11.8 Hz, 1H), 2.96 (s, 6H), 2.84 (dd, J = 14.5 Hz, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 0.96–0.91 (m, 2H), −0.03
(s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.8, 168.9, 152.0, 146.7, 131.8, 118.0, 90.6, 66.5, 63.8,
55.8, 41.9, 26.4, 17.3, −1.6; MS-(ESI) m/z 390.9 [M + Na]+, 406.8 [M + K]+.
Anal. Calcd for C17H28N2O5Si: C 55.41, H 7.66, N 7.60, O 21.71, Si 7.62. Found: C 55.39, H
7.69, N 7.61, O 21.73, Si 7.60.
Synthesis of 1-Allyl 2-(2-(trimethylsilyl)ethyl)
(2S)-4-((dimethylamino)methyl)-5-oxopyrrolidine-1,2-dicarboxylate
(9)
To a solution of 8 (1.95 g,
5.3 mmol,
1 equiv) in DCM (40 mL), was added AcOH (4 mL). After cooling to 0
°C, was added portion wise NaBH(OAc)3 (6.74 g, 32
mmol, 6 equiv). The ice bath was removed and the reaction mixture
was stirred at r.t. for 2.5 h. After quenching with water (20 mL),
a K2CO3 10% solution was added until pH = 9
was reached. The organic layer was separated, dried over anhydrous
Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated at reduced
pressure to give a 2:1 mixture of diastereoisomers 9 (1.95
g, quantitative, r.d. determined by 1H NMR analysis) as
a yellow oil, which was used in the next step without any further
purification. R 0.40
(90:10 DCM:MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) 5.87–5.74
(m, 1H), 5.28 (dd, J = 17.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 5.13 (dd, J = 10.5, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 4.66–4.54 (m, 2H), 4.51 (major)/4.46 (minor) ([dd, J = 9.3, 1.9 Hz]/[dd, J = 9.2, 6.0 Hz], 1H), 4.18–4.08
(m, 2H), 2.76–2.65 (m, 1H), 2.61 (major)/2.52
(minor) ([dd, J = 12.6, 4.3 Hz]/[dd, J = 12.5, 4.6 Hz], 1H), 2.46–2.30 (m, 1H), 2.23–2.14
(m, 1H), 2.11 (major)/2.10 (minor) ([s/s], 3H), 1.98–1.88 (m, 1H), 0.93–0.86 (m, 2H),
−0.07 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz,
CDCl3) 173.7 (minor), 173.6 (major), 171.2 (minor), 171.0 (major),
150.7, 131.0, 118.6 (minor), 118.5 (major), 67.1 (minor), 67.0 (major),
64.0 (major), 63.8 (minor), 59.8
(minor), 59.6 (major), 57.4 (minor), 57.0 (major), 45.6 (major), 45.3 (minor), 41.5, 40.6, 27.9, 26.1, 17.2, −1.7;
MS-(ESI) m/z 371.1 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd for C17H30N2O5Si: C 55.11; H 8.16; N 7.56; O 21.59; Si 7.58. Found: C 55.15;
H 8.21; N 7.53; O 21.57; Si 7.56.
Synthesis of 1-Allyl 2-(2-(trimethylsilyl)ethyl)
(S)-4-methylene-5-oxopyrrolidine-1,2-dicarboxylate
(4)
To a solution of 9 (1.95 g,
5.3 mmol) in methanol
(5 mL) was added MeI (10 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred overnight
at r.t. After concentration, the residue was dissolved in a 1:4 mixture
of Et3N/DCM (25 mL) and the reaction was stirred overnight
at r.t. The solvents were evaporated and the residue diluted with
EtOAc (50 mL). After washing with saturated NaHCO3 solution
(1 × 30 mL) and 1 M HCl solution (2 × 30 mL), the layers
were separated. The organic phase was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated to give pure 4 (1.30 g, 75% over the two steps) as a yellow oil. R 0.45 (70:30 Hex/EtOAc); [α]D20 −19.2 (c = 1.00, CHCl3);. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ
6.24 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.0–5.87 (m, 1H),
5.53 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 5.41 (dd, J = 17.2, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 5.25 (dd, J = 10.5, 1.3 Hz,
1H), 4.80–4.69 (m, 2H), 4.64 (dd, J = 10.2,
3.1 Hz, 1H), 4.27–4.18 (m, 2H), 3.09 (ddt, J = 17.5, 10.2, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 2.79–2.68 (m, 1H), 1.02–0.94
(m, 2H), 0.02 (s, 9H).;13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 170.9, 165.1, 151.6, 136.4, 131.2, 121.5,
119.0, 67.5, 64.5, 55.7, 28.1, 17.5, −1.5; MS-(ESI) m/z 348.0 [M + Na]+, 364.0 [M
+ K]+. Anal. Calcd for C15H23NO5Si: C 55.36; H 7.12; N 4.30; O 24.58; Si 8.63. Found: C 55.90;
H 7.14; N 4.28; O 24.57; Si 8.65.
Synthesis of Bis(2-phenylpropan-2-yl)
3,3′-disulfanediyl(2R,2′R)-bis(2-((((9H-fluoren-9-yl)methoxy)carbonyl)amino)propanoate)
(11)
To a suspension of Fmoc-cystine 10 (750 mg,
1.16 mmol, 1 equiv) in dry DCM (20 mL) was added dropwise cumyl trichloroacetimidate[6] (1.85 g, 6.6 mmol, 6 equiv). After stirring overnight
at r.t., the reaction mixture was washed with 0.5% aqueous citric
acid solution (3 × 10 mL) and saturated NaHCO3 solution
(1 × 30 mL). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated at reduced pressure.
The crude was purified by FC (70:30 Hex/EtOAc) to give 11 (886 mg, 83%) as a white foam. R 0.50 (70:30 Hex/EtOAc); [α]D20 −10.8 (c = 1.00, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.73 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 4H), 7.55 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 4H),
7.38–7.25 (m, 18H), 5.68 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H),
4.71–4.63 (m, 2H), 4.40–4.28 (m, 4H), 4.21–4.14
(m, 2H), 3.33–3.10 (m, 4H), 1.82 (s, 6H), 1.80 (s, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ
169.0, 155.9, 144.8, 143.9, 141.4, 128.5, 127.8, 127.6, 127.2, 125.3,
124.5, 120.1, 84.4, 67.4, 54.3, 47.2, 41.9, 28.6, 28.3; MS-(ESI) m/z + 943.6 [M + Na]+, 959.6
[M + K]+. Anal. Calcd for C54H52N2O8S2: C 70.41; H 5.69; N 3.04; O 13.90,
S 6.96. Found: C 70.44; H 5.66; N 3.06; O 13.88; S 6.98.
To a solution of 11 (811 mg,
0.881 mmol, 1 equiv) in THF (15 mL) and under
a N2 atmosphere, were added H2O (32 μL,
1.76 mmol, 2 equiv) and Bu3P (434 μL, 1.76 mmol,
1 equiv). The reaction was stirred for 45 min at r.t. and then quenched
with H2O (1.5 mL). After concentration under reduced pressure,
the crude was purified by FC (80:20 Hex/EtOAc) to give 12 (360 mg, 90%) as a white foam. R 0.42 (80:20 Hex/EtOAc); [α]D20 −2.4 (c = 1.00, CHCl3); 1H NMR(400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.78 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.60 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H),
7.45–7.27 (m, 9H), 5.67 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H),
4.70–4.59 (m, 1H), 4.51–4.34 (m, 2H), 4.23 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.13–3.00 (m, 2H), 1.86 (s, 3H),
1.84 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.6, 155.7, 144.7, 143.9, 143.8, 141.4, 128.5,
127.9, 127.6, 127.2, 125.2, 124.5, 120.1, 84.2, 67.2, 55.5, 47.3,
28.6, 28.3, 27.4; MS-(ESI): m/z 484.0
[M + Na]+, 500.0 [M + K]+. Anal. Calcd For C27H27NO4S: C 70.26; H 5.90; N 3.03; O
13.86; S 6.95. Found: C 70.27; H 5.87; N 3.00; O 13.85; S 6.97.
To a solution of 3b (178
mg, 0.22 mmol, 1 equiv) in a 5:2 mixture of THF/H2O (7
mL), cooled to 0 °C, was added a 1 M aqueous solution of LiOH·H2O (258 μL, 0.26 mmol, 1.2 equiv). After stirring at
the same temperature for 1 h, a 1 M aqueous solution of HCl was added
until pH = 2 was reached. AcOEt (25 mL) was added and the layers were
separated. The organic phase was washed with water (25 mL), dried
over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated at reduced
pressure. The crude was purified by FC (100% DCM to 95:5 DCM/MeOH)
to give 15b (171 mg, 92%) as a white foam R 0.38 (95:5 DCM:MeOH); [α]D20 +40.0 (c = 1.00, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOD) δ 7.75 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.62 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.47–7.11
(m, 9H), 5.96–5.81 (m, 1H), 5.28 (d, J = 17.2
Hz, 1H), 5.14 (dd, J = 10.5, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 4.53–4.32
(m, 6H), 4.21–4.16 (m, 3H), 3.27–3.08 (m, 2H), 3.08–2.88
(m, 2H), 2.51–2.38 (m, 1H), 2.24 (dd, J =
14.5, 8.6 Hz, 1H), 1.76 (s, 6H), 1.05–0.92 (m, 2H), 0.01 (s,
9H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, MeOD) δ 173.6,
172.9, 170.9, 158.3, 158.0, 146.6, 145.1, 142.5, 134.1, 129.2, 128.7,
128.2, 128.0, 126.3, 125.4, 120.9, 117.6, 84.6, 68.2, 66.7, 64.8,
61.4, 56.4, 52.6, 48.3, 41.1, 38.6, 36.2, 29.0, 28.9, 18.1, −1.5;
MS-(ESI) m/z 844.7 [M–H]−. Anal. Calcd For C42H51N5O10SSi: C 59.63; H 6.08; N 8.28; O 18.91; S 3.79;
Si 3.32. Found: C 59.65; H 6.06; N 8.26; O 18.96; S 3.76; Si 3.31.
Authors: Kathrin Meindl; Timo Schmiederer; Kathrin Schneider; Andreas Reicke; Diane Butz; Simone Keller; Hans Gühring; László Vértesy; Joachim Wink; Holger Hoffmann; Mark Brönstrup; George M Sheldrick; Roderich D Süssmuth Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2010-02-01 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Sebastian Blockus; Svenja M Sake; Martin Wetzke; Christina Grethe; Theresa Graalmann; Marina Pils; Ronan Le Goffic; Marie Galloux; Hans Prochnow; Katharina Rox; Stephan Hüttel; Zeljka Rupcic; Bettina Wiegmann; Ronald Dijkman; Marie-Anne Rameix-Welti; Jean-François Eléouët; W Paul Duprex; Volker Thiel; Gesine Hansen; Mark Brönstrup; Sibylle Haid; Thomas Pietschmann Journal: Antiviral Res Date: 2020-03-18 Impact factor: 5.970