Literature DB >> 33598736

Postoperative health-related quality of life of patients with gynecological malignancy: a meta-analysis.

Se-Ge Ma1,2, Xue Deng3, Lu Xing3, Yan Huang4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the short-term (1, 3, 6, 12 months) QoL changes after surgery for patients with gynecological malignancies in a meta-analysis.
METHODS: We collected studies based on the PICOS (patients, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study design) framework (P: patients with gynecological malignancy; I: surgery; C: presurgery; O: QoL scores; S: randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, or cohort studies) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, EBSCO, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases up to June 28, 2020. Then, two reviewers independently performed article screening, data extraction, and study quality evaluation. Stata 15.0 software was utilized for data analysis.
RESULTS: Nine studies with 1476 patients were ultimately included. QoL in global health status improved until 12 months after surgery with a maximum improvement (6.99 [0.31, 13.68], P = 0.04), and QoL in emotional functioning reduced significantly until 12 months after surgery with a maximum reduction (14.87 [10.29, 19.45], P < 0.00001). All of the symptom scales were reduced significantly until 12 months postoperation, indicating quality of life improvement. There was a clinical reduction in QoL but symptom experience (-3.31 [-5.51, -1.12], P=0.003) at six months after surgery compared with baseline (presurgery), with only sexual worry being statistically significant (4.61 [0.95, 8.27], P=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The recovery time varied among each dimension of the postoperative QoL of patients with gynecological malignancies; only a few functions and symptoms began to improve at 1 month postoperation and more at 12 months postoperation. Therefore, it is vitally important to develop extended care programs targeting the multidimensional aspects of QoL for patients with gynecological malignancies after surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gynecological malignancy; Meta-analysis; Postoperation; Quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33598736     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06053-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  38 in total

Review 1.  A comprehensive strategy for the interpretation of quality-of-life data based on existing methods.

Authors:  Patrick Marquis; Olivier Chassany; Linda Abetz
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 2.  Effects of lifestyle modification on cancer recurrence, overall survival and quality of life in gynaecological cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ladan Yeganeh; Cheryce Harrison; Amanda J Vincent; Helena Teede; Jacqueline A Boyle
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The impact of gynaecological cancer treatment on physical activity levels: a systematic review of observational studies.

Authors:  Kuan-Yin Lin; Lara Edbrooke; Catherine L Granger; Linda Denehy; Helena C Frawley
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Worldwide burden of gynaecological cancer: the size of the problem.

Authors:  R Sankaranarayanan; J Ferlay
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 5.237

5.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Quality of life and sexual functioning in gynecological cancer patients: results from quantitative and qualitative data.

Authors:  Nesrin Reis; Nezihe Kizilkaya Beji; Anahit Coskun
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.398

7.  Longitudinal assessment of quality of life in ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Beata Penar-Zadarko; Monika Binkowska-Bury; Maja Wolan; Jan Gawelko; Krzysztof Urbanski
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.398

Review 8.  Lived experiences and quality of life after gynaecological cancer-An integrative review.

Authors:  Ragnhild Johanne Tveit Sekse; Gail Dunberger; Mette Linnet Olesen; Maria Østerbye; Lene Seibaek
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.036

9.  The impact of surgery for vulval cancer upon health-related quality of life and pelvic floor outcomes during the first year of treatment: a longitudinal, mixed methods study.

Authors:  Georgina L Jones; Richard M Jacques; Joanne Thompson; Hilary J Wood; Jane Hughes; William Ledger; Mo'iad Alazzam; Stephen C Radley; John A Tidy
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Chirag A Shah; Tiffany Beck; John B Liao; Nadia V Giannakopoulos; Dan Veljovich; Pam Paley
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.