Literature DB >> 33598396

Effect of micro-osteoperforations on rate of space closure by mini-implant supported maxillary anterior en-masse retraction: A randomized clinical trial.

Pradeep Raghav1, Amit Kumar Khera1, Pranav Bhasin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Micro-osteoperforations is one of the non-invasive surgical techniques used in attempt to accelerate OTM. Conflicting reports on its effectiveness has been reported in the literature.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this trial were to investigate the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of space closure and on molar anchorage loss during mini-implant supported maxillary anterior en-masse retraction. TRIAL
DESIGN: A single center, parallel arm, randomized controlled trial was conducted.
METHOD: Sixty, male and female subjects (age range 16-25 years) having Class I bimaxillary protrusion or Class II div 1 malocclusion, who required fixed mechanotherapy with either upper 1st premolar or all four 1st premolar extractions were allocated into two groups using 1:1 allocation ratio. The allocation was done by block randomization method with a block size of 6. In the experimental group, 5 MOPs per side were performed only once just before the en-masse anterior retraction. Mini-screws were placed in order to obtain maximum anchorage. Impressions were taken every month till 4 months and rate of space closure was measured on 3D study models.
RESULTS: Data of 27 subjects in control (attrition ​= ​3) and 28 subjects in experimental group (attrition ​= ​2) were analyzed at the end of this trial. There was a statistically significant increase in the rate of en-masse retraction for the 1st month(p ​= ​0.001,95%CI, 0.17, 0.37 ​mm) but there was no statistically significant difference for the subsequent 2nd (p ​= ​0.450,95%CI,0.13,0.43 ​mm), 3rd(p ​= ​0.204,95%CI,0.23,0.47 ​mm) and 4th month (p ​= ​0.680,95%CI,0.21,0.41 ​mm) between experimental and control groups. There was also no difference (p ​> ​0.05) in molar anchorage loss between both groups at all time intervals.
CONCLUSION: Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) did not accelerate the rate of anterior en-masse retraction over a period of 4 months; however, it temporarily increases the rate of retraction only for first month and no affect on molar anchorage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at www.ctri.nic.in with CTRI No- CTRI/2019/03/018140).
© 2021 Craniofacial Research Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  En-masse retraction; Micro osteoperforation; TAD

Year:  2021        PMID: 33598396      PMCID: PMC7868723          DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res        ISSN: 2212-4268


  30 in total

Review 1.  Accelerated orthodontic treatment - what's the evidence?

Authors:  P Miles
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.291

2.  Mini-implant supported canine retraction with micro-osteoperforation: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Saritha Sivarajan; Jennifer Geraldine Doss; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Martyn T Cobourne; Mang Chek Wey
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Rapid orthodontics with alveolar reshaping: two case reports of decrowding.

Authors:  W M Wilcko; T Wilcko; J E Bouquot; D J Ferguson
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of aging on RANKL and OPG levels in gingival crevicular fluid during orthodontic tooth movement.

Authors:  K Kawasaki; T Takahashi; M Yamaguchi; K Kasai
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Alveolar corticotomies for accelerated orthodontics: A systematic review.

Authors:  A P S Gil; O L Haas; I Méndez-Manjón; J Masiá-Gridilla; A Valls-Ontañón; F Hernández-Alfaro; R Guijarro-Martínez
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Electric currents, bone remodeling, and orthodontic tooth movement. II. Increase in rate of tooth movement and periodontal cyclic nucleotide levels by combined force and electric current.

Authors:  Z Davidovitch; M D Finkelson; S Steigman; J L Shanfeld; P C Montgomery; E Korostoff
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1980-01

7.  Effectiveness and Safety of Minimally Invasive Orthodontic Tooth Movement Acceleration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  T Fu; S Liu; H Zhao; M Cao; R Zhang
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Effects of micro-osteoperforations performed with Propel system on tooth movement, pain/quality of life, anchorage loss, and root resorption: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cibelle Cristina Oliveira Dos Santos; Paulo Mecenas; Mônica Lidia Santos de Castro Aragón; David Normando
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.750

9.  Micro-osteoperforations and Its Effect on the Rate of Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Khalifa S Al-Khalifa; Hosam A Baeshen
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2020-07-01

Review 10.  Effectiveness of minimally invasive surgical procedures in the acceleration of tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alaa M H Alfawal; Mohammad Y Hajeer; Mowaffak A Ajaj; Omar Hamadah; Bassel Brad
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.