Literature DB >> 33598046

Evaluation of existing guidelines for their adequacy for the molecular characterisation and environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants obtained through synthetic biology.

Hanspeter Naegeli, Jean-Louis Bresson, Tamas Dalmay, Ian Crawford Dewhurst, Michelle M Epstein, Leslie George Firbank, Philippe Guerche, Jan Hejatko, Francisco Javier Moreno, Fabien Nogue, Nils Rostoks, Jose Juan Sanchez Serrano, Giovanni Savoini, Eve Veromann, Fabio Veronesi, Josep Casacuberta, Adinda De Schrijver, Antoine Messean, Nicola Patron, Matias Zurbriggen, Fernando Alvarez, Yann Devos, Andrea Gennaro, Franz Streissl, Nikoletta Papadopoulou, Ewen Mullins.   

Abstract

Synthetic Biology (SynBio) is an interdisciplinary field at the interface of engineering and biology aiming to develop new biological systems and impart new functions to living cells. EFSA has been asked by the European Commission to evaluate SynBio developments in agri-food with the aim of identifying the adequacy of existing guidelines for risk assessment and determine if updated guidance is needed. The scope of this opinion covers the molecular characterisation and environmental risk assessment of such genetically modified plants obtained through SynBio, meant to be for cultivation or food and feed purposes. The previous work on SynBio by the non-food scientific Committees (2014, 2015) was used and complemented with the output of a horizon scanning exercise, which was commissioned by the EFSA to identify the most realistic and forthcoming SynBio cases of relevance to this remit. The horizon scan did not identify other sectors/advances in addition to the six SynBio categories previously identified by the non-food scientific committees of the European Commission. The exercise did show that plant SynBio products reaching the market in the near future (next decade) are likely to apply SynBio approaches to their development using existing genetic modification and genome editing technologies. In addition, three hypothetical SynBio case studies were selected by the working group of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), to further support the scoping exercise of this Scientific Opinion. Using the selected cases, the GMO Panel concludes that the requirements of the EU regulatory framework and existing EFSA guidelines are adequate for the risk assessment of SynBio products to be developed in the next 10 years, although specific requirements may not apply to all products. The GMO Panel acknowledges that as SynBio developments evolve, a need may exist to adjust the guidelines to ensure they are adequate and sufficient.
© 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Commission Directive 2018/350; Commission Implementing Regulation 503/2013; deliberate release; environment; gene editing; genetically modified organisms; transgenes

Year:  2021        PMID: 33598046      PMCID: PMC7863006          DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EFSA J        ISSN: 1831-4732


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of existing guidelines for their adequacy for the food and feed risk assessment of microorganisms obtained through synthetic biology.

Authors:  Simon More; Vasileios Bampidis; Diane Benford; Claude Bragard; Thorhallur Halldorsson; Antonio Hernández-Jerez; Susanne Hougaard Bennekou; Kostas Koutsoumanis; Claude Lambré; Kyriaki Machera; Ewen Mullins; Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Josef Schlatter; Dieter Schrenk; Dominique Turck; Maged Younes; Lieve Herman; Carmen Pelaez; Henk van Loveren; Just Vlak; Joana Revez; Jaime Aguilera; Reinhilde Schoonjans; Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-16

2.  Evaluation of existing guidelines for their adequacy for the food and feed risk assessment of genetically modified plants obtained through synthetic biology.

Authors:  Ewen Mullins; Jean-Louis Bresson; Tamas Dalmay; Ian Crawford Dewhurst; Michelle M Epstein; Leslie George Firbank; Philippe Guerche; Jan Hejatko; Francisco Javier Moreno; Fabien Nogue; Nils Rostoks; Jose Juan Sanchez Serrano; Giovanni Savoini; Eve Veromann; Fabio Veronesi; Josep Casacuberta; Matias D Zurbriggen; Antonio Fernandez; Jose Angel Gomez Ruiz; Andrea Gennaro; Nikoletta Papadopoulou; Anna Lanzoni; Hanspeter Naegeli
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-07-20

Review 3.  Biosafety of Genome Editing Applications in Plant Breeding: Considerations for a Focused Case-Specific Risk Assessment in the EU.

Authors:  Michael F Eckerstorfer; Marcin Grabowski; Matteo Lener; Margret Engelhard; Samson Simon; Marion Dolezel; Andreas Heissenberger; Christoph Lüthi
Journal:  BioTech (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-22

Review 4.  Biotechnological Advances to Improve Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crops.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Villalobos-López; Analilia Arroyo-Becerra; Anareli Quintero-Jiménez; Gabriel Iturriaga
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Scientific Opinion on development needs for the allergenicity and protein safety assessment of food and feed products derived from biotechnology.

Authors:  Ewen Mullins; Jean-Louis Bresson; Tamas Dalmay; Ian Crawford Dewhurst; Michelle M Epstein; Leslie George Firbank; Philippe Guerche; Jan Hejatko; Hanspeter Naegeli; Fabien Nogué; Nils Rostoks; Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano; Giovanni Savoini; Eve Veromann; Fabio Veronesi; Antonio Fernandez Dumont; Francisco Javier Moreno
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-01-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.